. >> i dissented from that oceeding. i thought it was harmful to the market. the idea was counterproductive. righte basically former -- regulation that is similar to what we had in the 19th century. we are forcing that on the internet, which operates in april the different way. we need to rethink that. we need to look at it through the lens of consumer protection. rather than legacy regulations. i agree with craig and part of what he said in terms of the fcc going forward. it will be risky for them. especially if they tried to reenact a nondiscrimination legislation. that was in the outline yesterday. that looks like, and regulations. under 706, were not going to stand up on appeal. there are completely different panels of judges. does silverman wrote a very lengthy and thoughtful piece about why the majority was wrong. could be a different panel of judges. the fcc does not have any authority here. there is some risk there as well. it is not a guarantee. we may not win our you'll either. there are a variety of reasons. appealould be a tax on -- attacks on appe