we will be then going back to the planning commission and the oci commission for formal approval. we'll be amending some of our documents. worried about the plan or disposition and development agreement and making conforming changes to one of the other documents, transportation plan, infrastructure plan, all of those things that will enable and create a framework for this vision that we have today. what we're hoping is the approval to come in from the planning commission, oci and then we'll be going back to the sfmta board and getting permission from them or approval, rather, on a transportation plan and then things end up at the board. so we'll bring it to the board for introduction in may and hope to secure approvals in june. so we're moving forward. we're very proud of the work that we're doing. and we can answer any questions that you may have. >> thank you. thank you for coming back here. i think you've been here several times in the past. commissioner matsuda and i were here back in 2010. things that we see here are things that we commented forcefully at that time, i'm sure

for hunters point and candlestick, for instance, that's response ored by oci.y are involved in a small way to help us in the negotiations, but in again, it's really sfpuc and the fire department who are leading the negotiations. oci, will step in if we need help, but in general, they step back. >> all right. i still don't know where the money is coming from because the developers push back way, way, way back and way hard on these kinds of things because these aren't an anticipated cost, and they are not small costs. so now i'm nervous. >> i agree. they do push back hard. however, we owe it to our rate payers to ensure that as these developers come in, they're paying their fair share. i don't expect a ratepayer on the west side to compensate for the development going in on a project x on the east side. so they do push back, but we push back as well and say we need you to help pay to bring the water to your project. that is the right way to handle it. but yes, it is an ongoing negotiation that is difficult. >> okay. i would be interested in keeping up with this m

hamilton families, oci, commissioner and staff. a round of applause for nadia. she is transforming our city. housing and development. thank you for all your hard work. our department of homelessness and supportive housing and jeff and his entire team. and a special thanks to our funding partners here at sf city, mark and ron. and so many others who played a role. sean and the golden state woreiers. these are organizations and individuals that stepped in when we needed them to. i want to say special recognition not only to the chief of staff and jason, but also steve who is here today for all of his years of hard work. thank you, everybody for being here today, appreciate it. >> i'd like to introduce supervisor jane kim. jane kim of district 6 has been a fighter as we know, for all of the citizens in the supervisor district 6. her integrity is up the charts. she represents some of the most impoverished neighborhoods in the city, treasure island. in the tenderloin, et cetera. and we're just really happy and pleased and we feel honored to have her. so without furth

we're certainly going to work with oci staff to refine it further and get the exact color. this is the design intent. >> commissioner rosales: yeah, again, impressive. i'm into bold more than gray, you know, so it's just very nice. i think it does give character to the building. >> commissioner singh: is it going to look like this? same color? >> don't look at the colors on that thing. >> commissioner singh: okay. >> commissioner rosales: those colors. they're beautiful pallette of colors. i didn't say this on the last item, but on the small business program, it's -- again, we're north of 80, almost 90% here, so this is fantastic. this is great news. those -- our policies are working, and i love the joint venture between cahill and hercules. >> yeah. it's a strong venture, and it will continue to be. >> yeah. i like the design. the only question is will the finishes open or close or are they stationary? >> we anticipate they'll be stationary at this point. >> i was just concerned about lighting into the units. >> yeah, and i think that's one of the elements that the team wi

we've got michael, director of the wireless future project here at new america's oci and we have gone [inaudible] competitive enterprise institute and senior fellow and we've got mary brown with cisco, we've got danielle with an tta and she is vice president and associate general counsel and finally we have roger has just generously given us a great background on the subject. michael, i was there with you. >> okay. thanks for doing this and as roger said it is looking increasingly unlikely that there will be a mandate for the src as the specific technology or any mandate for a vehicle to vehicle safety signaling and particulary there's no mandate the fcc should use the opportunity to make a to take immediate look at the highest and best news of this to fairly large and now increasingly valuable spectrum which weighs empty. it should be fairly obvious that quite a bit has changed since 1999 when it was first allocat allocated. i will mention a few of those. first, there is a revolutionary new auto safety technology to avoid most which is not just radiocommunication technology. as autom