it also has links to ocii's r s p page which all of our r s ps present there as well. so we've now come into compliance with that 1 strategy in terms of out reach and we will continue to go forward and do did things that need to be done there. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> i received a notice, i think, for the first time. my company is certified as a local business, my business company. so i received notices of upcoming opportunities. so i think our contractors, not just the shipyard and bayview but in other jurisdictions and others, mission bay and others are keeping us informed. i don't know if the other commissioners receive those updates /-rplts i haven't received anything. >> that's interesting. maybe because i'm a certified company. >> i am too. >> are you? >> yea. >> so we can talk about more of those. yea cause i get the so /hreus /taeugz because i can do them but it's obviously to the extent that i know people, i send them out. okay. thank you for that. i have a series of questions. let me see. i'm going to take them in order just to make them more understand

it also has links to ocii's r s p page which all of our r s ps present there as well. so we've now come into compliance with that 1 strategy in terms of out reach and we will continue to go forward and do did things that need to be done there. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> i received a notice, i think, for the first time. my company is certified as a local business, my business company. so i received notices of upcoming opportunities. so i think our contractors, not just the shipyard and bayview but in other jurisdictions and others, mission bay and others are keeping us informed. i don't know if the other commissioners receive those updates /-rplts i haven't received anything. >> that's interesting. maybe because i'm a certified company. >> i am too. >> are you? >> yea. >> so we can talk about more of those. yea cause i get the so /hreus /taeugz because i can do them but it's obviously to the extent that i know people, i send them out. okay. thank you for that. i have a series of questions. let me see. i'm going to take them in order just to make them more understand

it also has links to ocii's r s p page which all of our r s ps present there as well. so we've now come into compliance with that 1 strategy in terms of out reach and we will continue to go forward and do did things that need to be done there. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> i received a notice, i think, for the first time. my company is certified as a local business, my business company. so i received notices of upcoming opportunities. so i think our contractors, not just the shipyard and bayview but in other jurisdictions and others, mission bay and others are keeping us informed. i don't know if the other commissioners receive those updates /-rplts i haven't received anything. >> that's interesting. maybe because i'm a certified company. >> i am too. >> are you? >> yea. >> so we can talk about more of those. yea cause i get the so /hreus /taeugz because i can do them but it's obviously to the extent that i know people, i send them out. okay. thank you for that. i have a series of questions. let me see. i'm going to take them in order just to make them more understand

good afternoon, my name is kevin masude seen yf civil engineer with ocii. these items for design contracts interrelate through the transbay folsom [inaudible] entered into a contract with [inaudible] in a amounts of 2, 479, 808 gls for the design service for transbay folsom street improvement projects [inaudible] half of the contract is split between the 2 projects. these projects were identified need today transform the neighborhood. in 2013 the former agency executed a first amendment with cmg contract in the amont of 1, 124, 521 for 6 iletms. there were design service on isx street and new cycle track on folsom street and studies related to closure of clemen tinny street and analysis on the bus bridge lead toog the new transit sent squr the main 2 items were to design the pavilion structure and grant park to provide services for [inaudible] during the construction phase. that first amendment brought the contract valued to 3, 604, 329. currently the folsom street improvement project is developed to 50 percent construction document level of completion. the

>> any city employ whee sense transferred to ocii is a member of per and all ocii employees who are doingork for us under the work order with general service agency are also members of pers >> are all the other departments also the member oaf pers? >> every employee in ocii is a member of pers >> not ociii other departments >> all city department employees are members of ocii with exception of [inaudible] part the state pension plan going back through the -employees with more sinierty or members och pers but following pension reform in the 90 no safety employees are members of spers. >> i don't think i heard it referred to a [inaudible] fl is a motion by commissioner booustoes. second by commissioner [inaudible] can you call the roll. >> commissioner members please announce your vote with you call your name. commissioner [inaudible] yes. commissioner maund harb is absent. commissioner sing h, yes. commissioner bustoes, yes. madam chair rozaulest, yes. i have 4 i aye and one absent. >> that is adopted. can you call innext item on the regular agenda items [inaudible] >> next order of busine

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings. the developer [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any ques

is the responsible agency this project ocii has taken a very low key approach to mission bay over the years, in fact, the last couple of years we've been starved for staff help and support as tiffany knows we need dedication if, if you, dictate those monitoring and everything else we need you ocii to make it sure things happen bruce because they won't hopping happen up to this or that agency you dedicate to it go took us 15 years to get across mission bay promised in '03 we still have streets that are open that are finished and not open parks that are finished and not open we need the ocii to take is an aggressive approach to managing the process to survive this thank you. >> thank you. >> (calling names) prelim make your way to the podium. >> good morning. my name is a david i'm coming here in support of warriors project first of all, i live in the mission now and visited 3 hours away in 1998 my dad drove me to the area of third street and where around was it was desolate and demand not a source of pride when i think the most beautiful city in the america my dad said the 0 giants wil

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings. the developer [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any ques

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings. the developer [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any ques

they have met the objective at the sbe program within ocii. the figures that are represented in your packet is what it is. it's a meeting objective about our program. >> okay, thank you. i second the motion. >> okay. yeah, thank you. now we have place holders. commissioner mondejar? >> go ahead. >> good afternoon, i'm so excited to see so many people that have taken time out of their day today to show up and express their opinions. i want to applaud the warriors. i really related to the gentleman who spoke about having a child and having a family and building memories and that we live in a major city and the need to have a world class stadium as well. and also seeing how the plans have evolved over time based upon the community feedback and working with local organizations and non-profit and taking your community giving efforts and implementing them in san francisco where you guys would like to build your stadium as well. so, thank you. >> commissioner mondejar? >> yes, thank you, chair, rosales. i echo what the rest of my fellow commissioners

is the responsible agency this project ocii has taken a very low key approach to mission bay over the years, in fact, the last couple of years we've been starved for staff help and support as tiffany knows we need dedication if, if you, dictate those monitoring and everything else we need you ocii to make it sure things happen bruce because they won't hopping happen up to this or that agency you dedicate to it go took us 15 years to get across mission bay promised in '03 we still have streets that are open that are finished and not open parks that are finished and not open we need the ocii to take is an aggressive approach to managing the process to survive this thank you. >> thank you. >> (calling names) prelim make your way to the podium. >> good morning. my name is a david i'm coming here in support of warriors project first of all, i live in the mission now and visited 3 hours away in 1998 my dad drove me to the area of third street and where around was it was desolate and demand not a source of pride when i think the most beautiful city in the america my dad said the 0 giants wil

is the responsible agency this project ocii has taken a very low key approach to mission bay over the years, in fact, the last couple of years we've been starved for staff help and support as tiffany knows we need dedication if, if you, dictate those monitoring and everything else we need you ocii to make it sure things happen bruce because they won't hopping happen up to this or that agency you dedicate to it go took us 15 years to get across mission bay promised in '03 we still have streets that are open that are finished and not open parks that are finished and not open we need the ocii to take is an aggressive approach to managing the process to survive this thank you. >> thank you. >> (calling names) prelim make your way to the podium. >> good morning. my name is a david i'm coming here in support of warriors project first of all, i live in the mission now and visited 3 hours away in 1998 my dad drove me to the area of third street and where around was it was desolate and demand not a source of pride when i think the most beautiful city in the america my dad said the 0 giants wil

is the responsible agency this project ocii has taken a very low key approach to mission bay over thein fact, the last couple of years we've been starved for staff help and support as tiffany knows we need dedication if, if you, dictate those monitoring and everything else we need you ocii to make it sure things happen bruce because they won't hopping happen up to this or that agency you dedicate to it go took us 15 years to get across mission bay promised in '03 we still have streets that are open that are finished and not open parks that are finished and not open we need the ocii to take is an aggressive approach to managing the process to survive this thank you. >> thank you. >> (calling names) prelim make your way to the podium. >> good morning. my name is a david i'm coming here in support of warriors project first of all, i live in the mission now and visited 3 hours away in 1998 my dad drove me to the area of third street and where around was it was desolate and demand not a source of pride when i think the most beautiful city in the america my dad said the 0 giants will be pla

i'm curious what is under that as well. >> ocii idea is their development are primarily in the sh

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings. the developer [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any ques

and treasure island they or had you. >> treasure island is not under ocii. >> i know that motorbike and are there housing 100 percent funded inclusive by appendixes. >> typically they're funded by ocii. >> so any affordable housing built in the shipyards will not use neighborhood preference. >> the appendixes will have to approve that they're very anxious to do that. >> they can have this preference but only approves separately is for the motorbike as well. >> they yeah they're looking anticipating this legislation. >> great i think the big thing to get this answer on the state grant one of the concerns do we have a neighborhood preference in place 70 percent of the residents work in district 6 and south of market including the people that live far from san francisco they will autumn get preference in all of district of portfolio and that will be counter to the amendment that is before us today, i median a lot of people 54 percent in san francisco is affordable housing not only people that live in san francisco but live far so make sure if we have a preference that work in the distr

both unanimous decisions last week, at the ocii commission and the planning commission. we'd like to also state we have been working closely with the office of economic and workforce development and city build to ensure that san francisco residents have a chance to work on this job. we're hiring residents. our contractors employee residents and we have members that live in the nearby vicinity and we have contractors based nearby the project site. these contractors are also inin favor of the project because this project is encouraging very fair competition management-wise. our companies pay their payroll taxes here and gross receipts here and the warriors have committed to working with us and our laborers and we would like to support the project today. >> thank you very much, next speaker, please. >> committee members my name is chris keller, a residence of las altos and i know about the work you do and want to thank you for the time and effort you put into your jobs. i'm here today as a member of the public to support this program, and this project, this arena for all of

agency residences the approval for aspects of projects therefore the project approvals happen with ocii and not necessarily are planning planning has a role when the documents that guides the development last week the overall plans or the design for development documents those amendments those documents do need your approval as well as noted in the memo as part of packet the initially phase of construction at candle stick point are part of review and looking at amendment to the dine for development or d-4-d approvals for the amendments for a person the dordz on the advanced calendar and this provides a board overall and more specific about candle stick and the dordz both 0 drew and willing will i from ocii staff and me to answer any questions but again, i'm let lennar from lennar provide the bulk of the presentation thank you very much. >> thank you very much matt commissioner president fong and commissioners i'm terry i'm the director of planning for lennar your honor, i'm here 0 for two reasons to provide a project overview we were approved approved in 2010 not back to the planning co

and treasure island they or had you. >> treasure island is not under ocii. >> i know that motorbikend are there housing 100 percent funded inclusive by appendixes. >> typically they're funded by ocii. >> so any affordable housing built in the shipyards will not use neighborhood preference. >> the appendixes will have to approve that they're very anxious to do that. >> they can have this preference but only approves separately is for the motorbike as well. >> they yeah they're looking anticipating this legislation. >> great i think the big thing to get this answer on the state grant one of the concerns do we have a neighborhood preference in place 70 percent of the residents work in district 6 and south of market including the people that live far from san francisco they will autumn get preference in all of district of portfolio and that will be counter to the amendment that is before us today, i median a lot of people 54 percent in san francisco is affordable housing not only people that live in san francisco but live far so make sure if we have a preference that work in the distric

that action the board recognized that the commission on community investment and infrastructure ocii on november 3, 2015 approved resolution 70-2015 which adopted california environment quality act findings. and including a statement of overriding considerations, and mp research and planning program as required by law. as part of the ocii approval of the resolution and other proval actions related to the golden state warriors event center and mixed-use district c pretty sured as conditions of approval, those aspects of mitigation measures and concerning transportation impacts in the mp research and p mitigation monitoring and reporting plan and this essentially recognizes the two mitigation measures and indicates that they have been imposed as conditions on the project by the commission on community investment and infrastructure. >> thank you, >> i just wanted to clarify the reason we put this recommendation in and i'm willing to ask what the city attorney says is that none of the documents we saw did it explicitly say that if there wasn't sufficient money for the mta to implement al

the mmrp included in that mmrp and ceqa findings is a transfer of responsibilities adopted by the ocii on tuesday and by the mta board and while we're in full agreement with the budget analyst, it's an unnecessary amendment to make today because it's already contained in what is adopted before you today. finally the comment about rush to judgment and request for continuance. this has been part of the standard approval process. we have been providing adequate notice and, in fact have been responding in writing to what we refer to as data dumps within hours of our meetings and don't feel there is any new information that wasn't addressed in the analyses or our responses to comments. >> thank you, any comments from my colleagues or questions at this time? mr. vander water, anything else that you want to add? >> just one second. >> by the way, in case i didn't do it, public comment is now closed. [ gavel ] >> we also submitted a response to a comment about public subsidy for the project in writing. and submitted that to the clerk of the board as part of the file. >> mr. vander water in ter

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings.eveloper [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any questions

and treasure island they or had you. >> treasure island is not under ocii. >> i know that motorbikend are there housing 100 percent funded inclusive by appendixes. >> typically they're funded by ocii. >> so any affordable housing built in the shipyards will not use neighborhood preference. >> the appendixes will have to approve that they're very anxious to do that. >> they can have this preference but only approves separately is for the motorbike as well. >> they yeah they're looking anticipating this legislation. >> great i think the big thing to get this answer on the state grant one of the concerns do we have a neighborhood preference in place 70 percent of the residents work in district 6 and south of market including the people that live far from san francisco they will autumn get preference in all of district of portfolio and that will be counter to the amendment that is before us today, i median a lot of people 54 percent in san francisco is affordable housing not only people that live in san francisco but live far so make sure if we have a preference that work in the distric

projects that maybe definitely impacted by the legislation so projects that are funded 100 percent ocii the federal fund and state funding and the clerk will fund 100 percent by and the breakdown would applies and wins the affordable housing for 100 percent and inclusionary some of the demographics breaks down and other categories he thinks that is not collected in every application but the information you have. >> thank you, supervisor kim. >> the first amendment to remove the displaced tenant at mayor's office of housing so we can continue to work with the stakeholders is there a motion on this amendment. >> so moved. >> we'll take that without objection. this amendment passes the second amendment is one i offered to increase from 25 to 40 percent we've heard a lot of discussion around do we need a roll call vote or an unanimous decision on that. >> okay why don't we had a roermentd on this amendment. >> on the - for clarification this is to increase the neighborhoods preference from 25 to 40 percent. >> is percentage amendment supervisor kim. >> just so i, comment i'm open to still t

and treasure island they or had you. >> treasure island is not under ocii. >> i know that motorbikend are there housing 100 percent funded inclusive by appendixes. >> typically they're funded by ocii. >> so any affordable housing built in the shipyards will not use neighborhood preference. >> the appendixes will have to approve that they're very anxious to do that. >> they can have this preference but only approves separately is for the motorbike as well. >> they yeah they're looking anticipating this legislation. >> great i think the big thing to get this answer on the state grant one of the concerns do we have a neighborhood preference in place 70 percent of the residents work in district 6 and south of market including the people that live far from san francisco they will autumn get preference in all of district of portfolio and that will be counter to the amendment that is before us today, i median a lot of people 54 percent in san francisco is affordable housing not only people that live in san francisco but live far so make sure if we have a preference that work in the distric

biotech community, the mission bay cac and i see chair kernwood is here in the audience, as well as ocii and the planning commission. although this project is generating millions in fees and tax revenues the events center is being proposed without city subsidies and will not cost taxpayers dollars. on the contrary project will be a large driver of revenue growth and provide annual contribution to our city funds. for this reason i believe and i support it's reasonable to utilize a portion of these fees and taxes generated by the project to mitigate impacts. this fund has been established to address the primary concerns of transportation, very much listening to the workers and residents of the area, to issues of crime and littering that also result from large events. to ensure we can fully fund strategies that minimize the events center's impact on the neighborhood. i'm sure many comments have already been previously made on what this legislation will do and i'm glad to see we'll be dedicating the funds whether it's parking control officers to ensure that the city has a stadium and arena,

or ocii unanimously approved that environmental impact report for the new arena in their mission bay. what gave them the traction that they needed? >> that they would mess up last night. if you want to see that game. [ laughter ] >> they want their team on this side of the bay. >> our best in history to have that world class arena. >> and even babies. now it looks like they will all get their wish. >> so congratulations, >> they voted unanimously to approve that project, saying that the arena did not violate their law. >> it is an essential -- essential step in our dreams. >> it's not consistent. they believe they should not be built, but rather that it will be somewhere else and that the whole area is set up like in that area promoting their uses and their research. so it will be set up for a different kind of use. that it will be compromised by the project. >> the arena will be built near their medical center, igniting their concerns over traffic and parking and their emergency access. but that they would work hard to alleviate that project, moved by stories that would share their

the mmrp included in that mmrp and ceqa findings is a transfer of responsibilities adopted by the ocii on tuesday and by the mta board and while we're in full agreement with the budget analyst, it's an unnecessary amendment to make today because it's already contained in what is adopted before you today. finally the comment about rush to judgment and request for continuance. this has been part of the standard approval process. we have been providing adequate notice and, in fact have been responding in writing to what we refer to as data dumps within hours of our meetings and don't feel there is any new information that wasn't addressed in the analyses or our responses to comments. >> thank you, any comments from my colleagues or questions at this time? mr. vander water, anything else that you want to add? >> just one second. >> by the way, in case i didn't do it, public comment is now closed. [ gavel ] >> we also submitted a response to a comment about public subsidy for the project in writing. and submitted that to the clerk of the board as part of the file. >> mr. vander water in ter

both unanimous decisions last week, at the ocii commission and the planning commission. we'd like to also state we have been working closely with the office of economic and workforce development and city build to ensure that san francisco residents have a chance to work on this job. we're hiring residents. our contractors employee residents and we have members that live in the nearby vicinity and we have contractors based nearby the project site. these contractors are also inin favor of the project because this project is encouraging very fair competition management-wise. our companies pay their payroll taxes here and gross receipts here and the warriors have committed to working with us and our laborers and we would like to support the project today. >> thank you very much, next speaker, please. >> committee members my name is chris keller, a residence of las altos and i know about the work you do and want to thank you for the time and effort you put into your jobs. i'm here today as a member of the public to support this program, and this project, this arena for all of

hundred and 77 we're asked for today and there is language in the executive summer memorize is the ociihis was a future event at the time that was published the language should be conditional. >> and then a note staff an e.r. root those provisions were adopted by ocii inclination that safeguards the final eir and copies are available to the public there was also a mta resolution number 15144 that was there their adoption of the ceqa findings that will be administrative code the draft motion we've gotten to date 2 letters of support and one opposed. >> if i could turn this on. >> it is on face up. >> commissioners the the item before you this afternoon is design review of two office buildings for 200 and 77 thousand square feet as part of golden state warriors event center the site mission bay blocks 21 and 31 have previously been allocated 6 hundred plus thousand office space the placing planning commission that asked to adopt the finding under the california environmental quality act including the considerations and the modification and monitoring and reporting program and approve the

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings.eveloper [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any questions

they also have an investment for the ocii commission agreed. tara moriarty live there in the city with more on this story. how did it go there today? >> reporter: this is a unanimous decision. a decision that came down to two things. the fastest thing that they were able to solve with a lot of congestion around there and able to come up with solutions. the second thing is the story that these families were sharing and how they would be able to go to sporting events with their kids. they said they were really moved by that. >> oh, the misses of last night. [ laughter ] come on, that is world class. >> reporter: san francisco fans, they want their team on this side of the bay and now it looks like they will all get their wish of the arena to be built near their medical center and that they have ignited concerns over traffic and parking as well as compromised emergency access. but in the end that they said that the plans, they did not violate their state environmental law, so the plans will move forward. >> it's a terrific milestone for the projec

. >> good morning, again, pam, sims, ocii and the resolution before you authority the application for the bond proceeds to pay for the construction related costs and for the mission bay, south east, 1300 fourth street. and 1300, 4th street, associates lp, with the department, corporation as a sponsor and when completed, this will be 143, unit, family, housing development, comprised of four or 50, 3, one bedroom, and 47 two bedroom and 42, three bedroom and includes one manager unit and it will be affordable to house olds at 20 percent to 50 percent of ami or area of the median income or between, 20,000 to 50,000, for a family of four, again this is conduit financing and we anticipate, submitting in december and if awarded we will return in april for issuance, and construction, is anticipated to finish, and completing in 2018. and representing the developers is here and that concludes my presentation. >> okay, thank you very much. >> colleagues any questions on item 25? >> anybody wish to comment on item 25? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, could i have a motion to

work together and in particular on one project that the mayor has district the arts commission and ocii which is the old redevelopment agency to look at it and find space for artist and musician housing so it is something that we've talked about in this commission and sort of vague terms for years and the mayor again gave a directive to those two agencies and when i heard about it i asked strongly that we get involved and try to you know help in any way we could there is early on in the stages looking for other cities that have similar kinds of projects but i hope the that that was one of the big outcomes of this beginning to collaborative and the other one like i said, the street perform problem we say we can't- the solve maybe with the street arts program those are the two ways concrete we can work together. >> there was a project that came before us i think that was building please help me remember open sutter street they were going to provide some housing in a building that race residential stereos duo do you remember. >> it was music fitting. >> i know and it is still there it is n

gunfires we've made great milestones having the ceqa and the all the others good stuff approved by ociind our respectfully governing bodies this is a world-class plan in the context of how it is world-class they step forward and they came out to the community and you know to ask what are some of the issues to get addressed before we planning and visualizing for the complex i appreciate how they've collaborated with the businesses and communities and the sf i say biotech research that bayview signed on and the community signed on i'm a community i live down the electricities is a beautiful. >> plan we've had issues with the t line in the community and especially on days the giant played they've looked at this in alignment what the central subway plan and the timing is everything so i'm encouraging you guys, you know, the good citizen as a supportive of that collaborative amazing project to accept this project before you and turn that property over and continue to moving forward with this amazing site so thank you guys and have a good afternoon. >> thank you very much edward conrad. >> he

modeling and answering questions that they v concurrently we met with the city controller's office, ocii, planning staff to verify the assumptions that are going into -- they go into both the tax increment and the cfd projections but the controller's office is looking at it with the cfd assumptions and making sure what building construction schedules are feeding into the projections are accurate and keeping those up-to-date so that's where we are with funding progress. moving forward as i said we will be continuing to work with them to put a plan in place that we can come to you in november along at arriving at the final budget number that everyone has confidence is a good number. we will want to award the remaining trade packages except those that were planned for next year in any case the ip network and the bus storage facility. we will be working with mtc to implement the cost recommendations. we talked about the maximum price. also setting up some type of committee or process for the funding partners can review change orders and we have begun working with mtc on the phase two cost re

and specifically 24 legislation applies to buildings fund and administrative code by the mohcd we ocii can't in their buildings but the commission is proactively taking that to adopt the preferences. >> actually, my question what are the specific programs that are under 100 percent dpw and hsa. >> okay. i apologize i have the total number 36 master building inspections but not the address i apologize. >> i had asked specifically i mean, my question what projects are not eligible for the project and you described the categories i want to know how many unit and which property. >> i'm hopefully to succeeding development to hud the neighborhood preference at 40 percent is acceptable to them and we'll be able to implement any projects that includes the hud funds and certainly for the state projects that are coming up that have stated funding i can name the projects we've hopefully that one a preference is adapted we'll successfully make the process success whether or not there are state or federal funds. >> i want to know if they don't approve it how many projects. >> sure. sure i have that

future open space, as we think long term redevelopment and ocii created wonderful open space opportunities but how are those parks going to be maintained in the future? on the reck reasian side, 19 percent the house holds have a child under the age of 18 and planning department projects the population of children will increase by 44 percent between now and 2040. i talked about recreation but you can see in our recreation is heavily subsidized and only rover recover about a 3rd of the cost of the fees we charge and no one is denied on the basis to pay. the scholarship has grown from [inaudible] our centers and swimming pools are funding for a 5 day week operationism we have a long wait list. materials and supplies per facilities-the national reck park standards says every fusimties needs about 100 thousand in materials and supplies and average 20s thousand. as more people come and use the parks we see a significant increase in people using the facilities for prifens purpose whether it birthday parties or community meetings. our ball field in parm of the city field foundation program we have

. >> good morning, again, pam, sims, ocii and the resolution before you authority the application for the bond proceeds to pay for the construction related costs and for the mission bay, south east, 1300 fourth street. and 1300, 4th street, associates lp, with the department, corporation as a sponsor and when completed, this will be 143, unit, family, housing development, comprised of four or 50, 3, one bedroom, and 47 two bedroom and 42, three bedroom and includes one manager unit and it will be affordable to house olds at 20 percent to 50 percent of ami or area of the median income or between, 20,000 to 50,000, for a family of four, again this is conduit financing and we anticipate, submitting in december and if awarded we will return in april for issuance, and construction, is anticipated to finish, and completing in 2018. and representing the developers is here and that concludes my presentation. >> okay, thank you very much. >> colleagues any questions on item 25? >> anybody wish to comment on item 25? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, could i have a motion to

future open space, as we think long term redevelopment and ocii created wonderful open space opportunities but how are those parks going to be maintained in the future? on the reck reasian side, 19 percent the house holds have a child under the age of 18 and planning department projects the population of children will increase by 44 percent between now and 2040. i talked about recreation but you can see in our recreation is heavily subsidized and only rover recover about a 3rd of the cost of the fees we charge and no one is denied on the basis to pay. the scholarship has grown from [inaudible] our centers and swimming pools are funding for a 5 day week operationism we have a long wait list. materials and supplies per facilities-the national reck park standards says every fusimties needs about 100 thousand in materials and supplies and average 20s thousand. as more people come and use the parks we see a significant increase in people using the facilities for prifens purpose whether it birthday parties or community meetings. our ball field in parm of the city field foundation program we have