take, for instance, one of our plaintiffs in the aclu lawsuit, barbara oden.eeds to prove her identity and so needs to get a social security card. she shows up at the social security office, and they tell her she needs a photo i.d. to get her social security card, so she's not a trained lawyer, and she's stuck in a catch-22 and goes home and thinks i can't vote. well, you know, that's simply not fair, and anyone who would disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters like barbara in the name of of legitimacy and integrity, well, they should probably look up the definition of those two words. >> well, rita, let me show you why i agree with john, and we've been fighting this on the show, and my work with the action network. look at the data. the republican national lawyers association says, and this is -- they are defending this, since 2004 out of 11 million votes cast, there's only 23 cases of fraud. so they are not solving a problem. there's no problem. they are creating the problem in undermining people's right to vote. this is 0.0002%. you're a teacher and