raise this issue with other partners to make every effort to ensure food security with odessa odessa grain corridor, i have the impression that in fact, in russia itself, there were different opinions about aggression in the country, yes. that is, it was clear that even the ministry, well, the russian foreign policy department, it was inclined to continue the grain agreement in some form, that is, to use it there in order to demand the lifting of all sanctions in order to use it so that it could be traded with its own grain and ukrainian stolen goods. of them, the restrictions in swift and the use of swift were removed there, and it was possible to supply ammonia fertilizers there, that is, but you know, er, hmm here i have the impression that these actions that are taking place at the moment are probably to prevent the continuation of this agreement. firstly, there was indeed an address by the president of ukraine zelenskyi to turkey and the un, referring directly to the agreement. that is, it was stated that it is absolutely logical that the grain agreement can continue artificially without the a

space and protect the operation of the grain corridor, but we see that they are not in a hurry to do this after the shelling of odessa and the ports of greater odessa. do you think this process will speed up, it has simply acquired a non -reverse nature, well, this is the same story as with other types of weapons that until for a certain time, in principle, even the conversation was taboo, then this conversation began , yes, for example, with tanks. well, then it was very difficult to get used to it. weapons are already taking part in hostilities and destroying the occupiers, they are inclined to think that the same will happen with airplanes. just as i wrote , on the one hand, we understand that the world does not want a long war for ukraine, on the other hand, the world needs time to give us new types of weapons. how does one correlate with the other, the reluctance to prolong the war, but also the reluctance to give enough weapons to end this war in a matter of months, in particular the f-16, we must first understand er and take into account our ability to absorb all the help that can be given to us at one moment yes i.e. pass the capability is

odessa portal. the last ship loaded with grain left the port of odessa on sunday. a. already today, the news agency publishes a video from the bosphorus, the same turkish ship tikhviyu sanson leaves the grain corridorlosed as a result of these actions of russia to turn food into weapons. using it as a weapon in the war against ukraine will impede access to food in regions that are desperately in need, and it will also provoke a rise in prices, we already, apparently this is the market, reacted by rising prices. the bottom line is that this is shamelessly this should not happen. the agreement must be restored as soon as possible the thesis, frankly speaking, not new first oil, then gas, now grain is worth the west to face the need to bear responsibility for their actions. how are there any accusations of blackmail here? using anything as a weapon, while convicted of everything and demonized by russia from washington, they also manage to read an unscrupulous decision, says blinkin. accept another. i have no doubt that my colleagues at the ministry of foreign affairs will give their assessment of mr. blinkin's words, but we categorically disagree with this. russia fulfilled its obligations and extends

odessa portal . the last ship loaded with grain left the port of odessa on sunday. a. already today, the news agency publishes a video from the bosphorus , the same turkish ship tikyu sansum leaves the grain corridorh is now closed as a result of russia's actions to turn food into weapons , using it as a weapon in the war against ukraine will make it difficult to access to food in regions that are in desperate need of it, and also this will provoke a rise in prices we already see, this is the market reacted with a rise in prices the bottom line is that it is shameless this should not happen , the agreement should be restored as soon as possible the thesis, to put it bluntly new first oil, then gas now here is the grain is worth the west to face the need to bear responsibility for their actions. how are the accusations of blackmail immediately sounded? the use of anything as a weapon, while convicted of everything in a row and demonized russia from washington also manage to read the notation shameless decision, - says blinkin. accept another. i have no doubt that my colleagues at the ministry of foreign affairs will give their assessment of these words of mr. blinkin, but we categorically disagree

grain initiative, after all, and what was the story like in a nutshell. thank you means, uh, providing a safe corridor along which ships from odessa , from odessa, from odessa out and supply this very grain without hindrance. here, thus the poorest countries , etc. yes, this is the first, but on the other hand , do it. it was a guarantee indeed russia will partially lift sanctions from grain to food and, very importantly, from fertilizers. remember, someone blew up the ammonia, who here also did it to the ammonia wire yes tolyatti odessa and think at least someone uttered, at least someone blathered, at least someone said something condemning about this, don’t remember michael no, i don’t remember either. here is such a story, so all this speculation about what it means we are there, russia is to blame back and forth. i have read. just a lot on this topic, any kind of fornication such a liberal everything, this is just bullshit so, meanwhile russian president vladimir putin today. now we'll see, listen. this is putin holding an operational meeting via video link with members of the country's security council. let's go now. well, such key statements are the