anyone that knows how to do it and do it well it is oewd so definitely continue on that. >> there is no question a 20 thousand dollar limit if that is the federal limit and proposing for us to adopt is insufficient for certain businesses. it may be more than enough for certain kind-in todays environment that is a pretty small move. >> we asked them to look into it. >> i think if collectively if we want to look in-i dont think it falls on the sholders of the planning commission, falls also on oewd to survey or business stakeholders sooewhat is the cost to relocate a business or look-there are probably statistics on this, i have no idea and they probably come from disaster from probably from various disasters that are caused relocations. so, maybe there is bench marks we can find readily. i'm not sure but imagine there might be so that is certainly one specific item where we can get a little more quantitative about it and determine whether the city is in a position to offer additional assistance, i don't know whether it is or not. how do you go about quadifying that. >> if you allow me

problems and create another position where is the paperwork what kind of a position you'll get to oewd is that the director you're talking about i don't know what you're talking about are you equating creating a new position for this agency and get it from oewd i don't know that about i'm my name is ace on the case damn it i'm on the case give me information 0 but it tells us you all going to get $300,000 for a position and i'm talking about what you commissioners have done in the fillmore let me say this i'll be back at city hall i'm the czar for t for the out ward immigration i'll be the prime example of media downstairs but i'm also the financial coordinator ambassador this gives me 3 i don't need our permission i'm on a mission so if we can work together in any community the best it is i'm not going to have the flimflam man and try to clean up like gas co-tried to clean up city hall we look at it as the fill no more we can't fill it we got no businesses you come down and found out no black businesses the fillmore have you read the papers all the businesses are clotted down except o

problems and create another position where is the paperwork what kind of a position you'll get to oewds that the director you're talking about i don't know what you're talking about are you equating creating a new position for this agency and get it from oewd i don't know that about i'm my name is ace on the case damn it i'm on the case give me information 0 but it tells us you all going to get $300,000 for a position and i'm talking about what you commissioners have done in the fillmore let me say this i'll be back at city hall i'm the czar for t for the out ward immigration i'll be the prime example of media downstairs but i'm also the financial coordinator ambassador this gives me 3 i don't need our permission i'm on a mission so if we can work together in any community the best it is i'm not going to have the flimflam man and try to clean up like gas co-tried to clean up city hall we look at it as the fill no more we can't fill it we got no businesses you come down and found out no black businesses the fillmore have you read the papers all the businesses are clotted down except one

anyone that knows how to do it and do it well it is oewd so definitely continue on that. >> there is no question a 20 thousand dollar limit if that is the federal limit and proposing for us to adopt is insufficient for certain businesses. it may be more than enough for certain kind-in todays environment that is a pretty small move. >> we asked them to look into it. >> i think if collectively if we want to look in-i dont think it falls on the sholders of the planning commission, falls also on oewd to survey or business stakeholders sooewhat is the cost to relocate a business or look-there are probably statistics on this, i have no idea and they probably come from disaster from probably from various disasters that are caused relocations. so, maybe there is bench marks we can find readily. i'm not sure but imagine there might be so that is certainly one specific item where we can get a little more quantitative about it and determine whether the city is in a position to offer additional assistance, i don't know whether it is or not. how do you go about quadifying that. >> if you allow me

problems and create another position where is the paperwork what kind of a position you'll get to oewd is that the director you're talking about i don't know what you're talking about are you equating creating a new position for this agency and get it from oewd i don't know that about i'm my name is ace on the case damn it i'm on the case give me information 0 but it tells us you all going to get $300,000 for a position and i'm talking about what you commissioners have done in the fillmore let me say this i'll be back at city hall i'm the czar for t for the out ward immigration i'll be the prime example of media downstairs but i'm also the financial coordinator ambassador this gives me 3 i don't need our permission i'm on a mission so if we can work together in any community the best it is i'm not going to have the flimflam man and try to clean up like gas co-tried to clean up city hall we look at it as the fill no more we can't fill it we got no businesses you come down and found out no black businesses the fillmore have you read the papers all the businesses are clotted down except o

it included noe valley bench marks for oewd. benchmark confirmation that noe valley received 5% of it's budget and confirmed that noe valley's cbd budget and benchmark identified for carried for and projects designated for carried forward. so for benchmark one, noe valley met this requirement as their annual budget was in variance points of all service categories in its management plan. for their assessment revenue, noe valley cbd met this requirement as 10% of their revenue was from non-assessment sources. for benchmark 3, was in 10 percentage points of their budget. noe valley also met benchmark four as they identified their carry over from fiscal year 2014-2015. for your record cbd's typical carry over the operating budget for not receiving the assessment funds of the first 6 months of the new year. the findings and recommendations for the know valley cbd is that noe valley met all of their expectations and requirements by state code and administration and seeking funding for the long-term streetscape plan and identified the

it included noe valley bench marks for oewd. benchmark confirmation that noe valley received 5% of it's budget and confirmed that noe valley's cbd budget and benchmark identified for carried for and projects designated for carried forward. so for benchmark one, noe valley met this requirement as their annual budget was in variance points of all service categories in its management plan. for their assessment revenue, noe valley cbd met this requirement as 10% of their revenue was from non-assessment sources. for benchmark 3, was in 10 percentage points of their budget. noe valley also met benchmark four as they identified their carry over from fiscal year 2014-2015. for your record cbd's typical carry over the operating budget for not receiving the assessment funds of the first 6 months of the new year. the findings and recommendations for the know valley cbd is that noe valley met all of their expectations and requirements by state code and administration and seeking funding for the long-term streetscape plan and identified the

it included noe valley bench marks for oewd. benchmark confirmation that noe valley received 5% of it's budget and confirmed that noe valley's cbd budget and benchmark identified for carried for and projects designated for carried forward. so for benchmark one, noe valley met this requirement as their annual budget was in variance points of all service categories in its management plan. for their assessment revenue, noe valley cbd met this requirement as 10% of their revenue was from non-assessment sources. for benchmark 3, was in 10 percentage points of their budget. noe valley also met benchmark four as they identified their carry over from fiscal year 2014-2015. for your record cbd's typical carry over the operating budget for not receiving the assessment funds of the first 6 months of the new year. the findings and recommendations for the know valley cbd is that noe valley met all of their expectations and requirements by state code and administration and seeking funding for the long-term streetscape plan and identified the

corgis or oewd? seeing none, mr. lamont, please come forward. >> thank you, mr. supervisor. i will make this brief. top of broadway community benefit district was organized in november 2013 and started services in january 2014 which gives us a little over two years' of operations. >> dominic, if you could speak into that -- there you go. >> store >> /sorry, 39 parcels and 130 businesses and our operation budget has been about $775,000 and provide five day a week sidewalk cleaning and that is a service paid a living wage, and we provide weekly thursday through saturday security to supplement sfpd interactions within our district. so this is the breakdown real quick of our actual expenses for the fiscal year 2014-2015. we had a generous donation from the -- during the formation of the district for $100,000, pledged by the broadway entertain and cultural association. those funds expired october 2015 and we also received $30,000 from a community challenge grant to install historical markers in and around the broadway district. mainly it will be on the broadway corridor, but some

today i have a number of questions for oewd, the tax collector, sfmta and superior court to figure how we in san francisco can look at our fines see how key can do better. making sure people are able to follow rules and doing in a way that it doesn't impover rsh those in san francisco. i'm interersed in hearing from city partners to it kwibe the impact thofz fees as we have a national conversation on how this is going in ferguson and the south but authhere in the state of california with particular taeckz to the suspension of licenses. the implementation of states amnisty program regarding traffic fine debt, the option of community suvs in lou of fine squz the payment programs we have available for those that cant pay large chunks of fines. i should note there was a segment on the john alver show last year on the impact municipal fines are having and the disproportioninate impact on [inaudible] whether these fineerize the prorept source of revenue and what are the appropriate revenue sources and looking at more equitable ways making sure we balance the rules we have on the books but al

the lease or must work with oewd to in that doesn't seem strong enough to make sure we get a mall full of change was in the middle south of market which i think would be a shame and would not be live up to the stature of this facility. so, i guess it makes me wonder, is there a way to put that much more explicitly into the rfp in terms of either the limit on percentage of the retail acme national chain or minimum something that is beyond just go talk to folks but is more firm requirement so that we don't get a big mall full of chain stores? >> we share your concern director reiskin. a couple of thoughts on this. one is, there is in the evaluation criteria process, i think one of the things that's we have seen other places that it's not as important of a locally owned businesses with the quality locally owned businesses. which is part of a holistic retail version. so, we have in terms of our evaluation criteria, put in points for not just local businesses but overall retail vision which incorporates local businesses. we've seen a lot of places where they have had and what's happened isa

last year, work done by your office, rec and park and oewd resulted in a modified phased plan for activatinghe car barn and the power house, and the planning work for that modified plan was funded through the mayor's budget at about 475 thousand dollars. the mayor's office is happy to continue to work with you and your office to figure out an appropriate strategy for fully funding the project, as i think i've shared with you, at this time, it's very difficult for our office to support general fund supplementals given the city's financial outlook, we've put out budget instructions that demonstrate that we have budgetary gaps growing from 100 million to 240 million dollars over the next two years so we'd like the work with you through the budget process through the capital planning committee to make sure that we're able to address the needs of the project but to do it in the context of the budget. happy to continue to work with you over the next weeks and months to figure this out, but that's kind of where we are to date. >> okay, and are you part of the kettle planning committee? >> i am, sup

both oewd and the advisory committee are very happy the work is more farmally gotten to this stage and back in front of you. the community [inaudible] and high priority to them and the recommendation to us to fully fund this assessment which we did. two quick points on behalf of my committee, one, they are very impressed with the quality of the product. i believe you had a quick summary of that today. they were comp lmentary of the consultant staff who researched and [inaudible] as well as your department and staff who helped manage the contract. secondly, want to emicize the pornts of implementing the reports and recommendation as far as preserveeration and retention and there urgency related to that need given the buildings condition and the sensitivity of the murals to whether conditions which are somewhat intense. also just a [inaudible] very much appreciate the direct engagement from your staff on the early stages of this. reviewing the grant application. we look forward to maintaining that active dialogue as we discussed in the grant review process as we go through implementation

the employer assess we're excited that city build will do that but to realize the vision we need a oewd and ask puc to work with other stakeholders and continue to find ways to improve the we have a motion and a second we appreciate all the work that pat mulligan and 0 others put into this program and looking forward to it xhovz as we go forward. >> mr. freed jason fried i'll directing your attention the last 3 believability points the ideas for the rewarding the complerz he fully support that i think you can 20/20 types of the bonuses a cca or smaller bonus that is signed that for the supergreen and give people more incentives for solar on the roof people are better late than never most the green attributes having them sign up for the supergreen we'll get the money for the other build outs that is an extra bonus not doing a large bonus but small bonus and give them the incentive and for the second one i fully support i'll take it a step further as the program is shifted to the new workforce model i see more people wanting to use the money that is available like the early years communit

i would just like to point out again, that this is the first project in the city for oewd's beginnings of an asset activation project that could do great things for many neighborhood in san francisco. something that has never been tried before. but i think this is an appropriate thing for the city to engage in. and the geneva, is happy to be the project most ready for this and i urge you, again, to support the project in the supplemental budget. >> thank you. are there any other members of the public who wish to comment on item 1? seeing none, public comment is closed. >>[gavel] >> thank you. i want to thank everyone for coming out for public comment and appreciate your presence here. coming twice . some of you. in a week. that is pretty big for folks in district 11. we are 5 miles from san francisco we have fewer people coming to public comment. appreciate your coming out. also received a number of letters as well as part of the project. from different neighborhood associations like the new mission terrace improving association. i will submit that into the record. it really shows the

so, in working with our friends at oewd and regina we learned a lot about what happens to a small businessind out they need to relocate and i think we learned the most from the soft story experience that you were all learning on now which is, early notice and lots of time to plan really makes a difference so we put in a requirement that the project sponsors notify current tenants as soon as they apply to the planning department for their first environmental review document. under the theory that letter which says by the way, here are 3 main organizations that can help you find support and do technical assistance will help the business develop the transition plan. we are pointing out the businesses qualify for cb 3 p and they go down to relocate and move through planning and building process as quickly as possible as they are a existing business if they qualify. this is a reminder of the process so the red box is when the first notification to the commercial tenet would hap squn you can see they have to go through planning review, ceqa, neighborhood notification and public hearing. before i

the employer assess we're excited that city build will do that but to realize the vision we need a oewd and ask puc to work with other stakeholders and continue to find ways to improve the we have a motion and a second we appreciate all the work that pat mulligan and 0 others put into this program and looking forward to it xhovz as we go forward. >> mr. freed jason fried i'll directing your attention the last 3 believability points the ideas for the rewarding the complerz he fully support that i think you can 20/20 types of the bonuses a cca or smaller bonus that is signed that for the supergreen and give people more incentives for solar on the roof people are better late than never most the green attributes having them sign up for the supergreen we'll get the money for the other build outs that is an extra bonus not doing a large bonus but small bonus and give them the incentive and for the second one i full support i'll take it a step further as the program is shifted to the new workforce model i see more people wanting to use the money that is available like the early years community

both oewd and the advisory committee are very happy the work is more farmally gotten to this stage and back in front of you. the community [inaudible] and high priority to them and the recommendation to us to fully fund this assessment which we did. two quick points on behalf of my committee, one, they are very impressed with the quality of the product. i believe you had a quick summary of that today. they were comp lmentary of the consultant staff who researched and [inaudible] as well as your department and staff who helped manage the contract. secondly, want to emicize the pornts of implementing the reports and recommendation as far as preserveeration and retention and there urgency related to that need given the buildings condition and the sensitivity of the murals to whether conditions which are somewhat intense. also just a [inaudible] very much appreciate the direct engagement from your staff on the early stages of this. reviewing the grant application. we look forward to maintaining that active dialogue as we discussed in the grant review process as we go through implementation

i would just like to point out again, that this is the first project in the city for oewd's beginnings of an asset activation project that could do great things for many neighborhood in san francisco. something that has never been tried before. but i think this is an appropriate thing for the city to engage in. and the geneva, is happy to be the project most ready for this and i urge you, again, to support the project in the supplemental budget. >> thank you. are there any other members of the public who wish to comment on item 1? seeing none, public comment is closed. >>[gavel] >> thank you. i want to thank everyone for coming out for public comment and appreciate your presence here. coming twice . some of you. in a week. that is pretty big for folks in district 11. we are 5 miles from san francisco we have fewer people coming to public comment. appreciate your coming out. also received a number of letters as well as part of the project. from different neighborhood associations like the new mission terrace improving association. i will submit that into the record. it really shows the

that is monitored by oewd and cindy >> i mean, for example, what is the percentage of san francisco residence working on this project? >> we will have to reach out to origin to get the percentage, the local resident portion on the origin project. >> more specifically, residents of the southeast sector and understanding where these residents are located? >> okay. with respect to the project funded by the ift that's before you today, these will be public works projects. so, the park crane cove park phase 2 project, the electrical infrastructure project, or did they take on some of the sidewalk repairs around the buildings but the bulk of the work being funded by the ift will be public works, and we will be working with our sister city agencies to set ld percentages and to recruit local residents to those jobs. >> proviso avalos >> just on local hiring i was a multitasking so i do not hear the whole conversation on local hiring, but the legislation that says on public land we need to be building at 30% local hiring across every trade, so that's not the goal on hearing? >> that is the goal. what

last year, work done by your office, rec and park and oewd resulted in a modified phased plan for activating the car barn and the power house, and the planning work for that modified plan was funded through the mayor's budget at about 475 thousand dollars. the mayor's office is happy to continue to work with you and your office to figure out an appropriate strategy for fully funding the project, as i think i've shared with you, at this time, it's very difficult for our office to support general fund supplementals given the city's financial outlook, we've put out budget instructions that demonstrate that we have budgetary gaps growing from 100 million to 240 million dollars over the next two years so we'd like the work with you through the budget process through the capital planning committee to make sure that we're able to address the needs of the project but to do it in the context of the budget. happy to continue to work with you over the next weeks and months to figure this out, but that's kind of where we are to date. >> okay, and are you part of the kettle planning committee? >> i am, s

last year, work done by your office, rec and park and oewd resulted in a modified phased plan for activating the car barn and the power house, and the planning work for that modified plan was funded through the mayor's budget at about 475 thousand dollars. the mayor's office is happy to continue to work with you and your office to figure out an appropriate strategy for fully funding the project, as i think i've shared with you, at this time, it's very difficult for our office to support general fund supplementals given the city's financial outlook, we've put out budget instructions that demonstrate that we have budgetary gaps growing from 100 million to 240 million dollars over the next two years so we'd like the work with you through the budget process through the capital planning committee to make sure that we're able to address the needs of the project but to do it in the context of the budget. happy to continue to work with you over the next weeks and months to figure this out, but that's kind of where we are to date. >> okay, and are you part of the kettle planning committee? >> i am, s

that is monitored by oewd and cindy >> i mean, for example, what is the percentage of san francisco residence working on this project? >> we will have to reach out to origin to get the percentage, the local resident portion on the origin project. >> more specifically, residents of the southeast sector and understanding where these residents are located? >> okay. with respect to the project funded by the ift that's before you today, these will be public works projects. so, the park crane cove park phase 2 project, the electrical infrastructure project, or did they take on some of the sidewalk repairs around the buildings but the bulk of the work being funded by the ift will be public works, and we will be working with our sister city agencies to set ld percentages and to recruit local residents to those jobs. >> proviso avalos >> just on local hiring i was a multitasking so i do not hear the whole conversation on local hiring, but the legislation that says on public land we need to be building at 30% local hiring across every trade, so that's not the goal on hearing? >> that is the goal. what

that is monitored by oewd and cindy >> i mean, for example, what is the percentage of san francisco residence working on this project? >> we will have to reach out to origin to get the percentage, the local resident portion on the origin project. >> more specifically, residents of the southeast sector and understanding where these residents are located? >> okay. with respect to the project funded by the ift that's before you today, these will be public works projects. so, the park crane cove park phase 2 project, the electrical infrastructure project, or did they take on some of the sidewalk repairs around the buildings but the bulk of the work being funded by the ift will be public works, and we will be working with our sister city agencies to set ld percentages and to recruit local residents to those jobs. >> proviso avalos >> just on local hiring i was a multitasking so i do not hear the whole conversation on local hiring, but the legislation that says on public land we need to be building at 30% local hiring across every trade, so that's not the goal on hearing? >> that is the goal. what

i would just like to point out again, that this is the first project in the city for oewd's beginnings of an asset activation project that could do great things for many neighborhood in san francisco. something that has never been tried before. but i think this is an appropriate thing for the city to engage in. and the geneva, is happy to be the project most ready for this and i urge you, again, to support the project in the supplemental budget. >> thank you. are there any other members of the public who wish to comment on item 1? seeing none, public comment is closed. >>[gavel] >> thank you. i want to thank everyone for coming out for public comment and appreciate your presence here. coming twice . some of you. in a week. that is pretty big for folks in district 11. we are 5 miles from san francisco we have fewer people coming to public comment. appreciate your coming out. also received a number of letters as well as part of the project. from different neighborhood associations like the new mission terrace improving association. i will submit that into the record. it really shows the

i would just like to point out again, that this is the first project in the city for oewd's beginnings of an asset activation project that could do great things for many neighborhood in san francisco. something that has never been tried before. but i think this is an appropriate thing for the city to engage in. and the geneva, is happy to be the project most ready for this and i urge you, again, to support the project in the supplemental budget. >> thank you. are there any other members of the public who wish to comment on item 1? seeing none, public comment is closed. >>[gavel] >> thank you. i want to thank everyone for coming out for public comment and appreciate your presence here. coming twice . some of you. in a week. that is pretty big for folks in district 11. we are 5 miles from san francisco we have fewer people coming to public comment. appreciate your coming out. also received a number of letters as well as part of the project. from different neighborhood associations like the new mission terrace improving association. i will submit that into the record. it really shows the

income, of course, 24 percent permanent affordable housing in the tenderloin that is the strategy that oewdut out an incredible number compared to the rest of the city, however, less than a thirds of families we serve actually live in that permanently affordable housing most of them are the odd 55 percent of the residence stabilized housing in the tenderloin this is not permanently favorable favorable 12 percent contributions to the below-market-rate is not enough for any city it is the test responsibility to insure that all developers up to the appropriate contribution for the affordable housing need to the city so commissioners the next step is in ouyour hands. >> good evening. i'm lapse the executive director of the gru 0 project inside a church half a block from the development site we allow about 200 and 50 homelessness o homeless people to come into the church and one and 10 at any given time people sleeping on the pews of the schich this the east 2 thousand meals a day where people come and get clothes to wear and see the case works across the street where families come and get medic