coverage, that we have a great opportunity to increase coverage over where we are right now, as p e oezed to where the line is going right now. >> let me go to this financial feasibility issue here. because in west virginia, kiezer family foundation estimates the following, that the $4,000 tax credit that a 60 year old making 30 thousand dollar a year will get under the american health care act is almost $8,000 less than they would get under obamacare.

coverage, that we have a great opportunity to increase coverage over where we are right now, as p e oezed to where the line is going right now. >> let me go to this financial feasibility issue here. because in west virginia, kiezer family foundation estimates the following, that the $4,000 tax credit that a 60 year old making 30 thousand dollar a year will get under the american health care act is almost $8,000 less than they would get under obamacare. this is a county that voted overwhelmingly for president trump. the point is this. you say it is going to make it more affordable and access to coverage. under this plan in this county in this state, less money and more expensive for these folks. >> that's looking at it in a silo. if you look at it in the way that the market will allow, then, for individuali ins to ha choices, who knows what that 60-year-old wants. i know that he or she knows what he or she wants and the way you provide a decrease in cost and choices for folks, you make it so the system can be responsive to that individual. that's the way you drive down costs. >> why not me

if we don't do this, if we don't oez so ÑiÑion, doesn't matterÑiÑli if we get r this trump, another trumppe will come. europe is full of trumps and so on and so on. i'm pretty desperate here. you know, i really think we are approaching catastrophe again. economic, social catastrophe. immigrant and so on. look at europe. this politically correct approach of liberal left, just let's talk about immigrant but let's change it into a humanitarian issue. do europeans have a car, have to have them, instead of address the true cause. then you get what? the catastrophe that is now europe. in germany, h france, in england. i don't think, but maybe i was wrong, it is not a principal decision. this logic always vote for the worst guy because in this way you will have -- no, i thought maybe i'm wrong but nonetheless, with all its faults, united states and a great country with many institution and so on and so on and things are happening that is a great debate within the democratic party. another thing in the beginning happening for example and extremely important thing. and revitalization of women in t

oez? -- oec? what we were hoping at the beginning but -- that the u.s.tories would slowly come down. however, because of the maintenance these days and the slow season of the first quarter, we have absorbed the fact that those inventories are not going anywhere. on the other hand, they are increasing slowly a little bit. what we are looking for is the five-year average of the countries and that stance right now at about 285 above the five-year average. once the inventory starts to go down, hopefully, we will go toward the five-year average which we hope to reach at the end of the third quarter. yousef: you're not concerned about the rebound in u.s. shale? the inventory may come down but the production may come back online even more than it is now. that cuttinge said 1.8 million barrels per day -- if you calculated with that cutg 1.8 million regard to an increase of about 1.5 million daily, per day summit and increase in 2017, subtract from that about 500,000 our expectation of an increase in countries, non-opec i think we are on the way of consuming that