what ofcom is — the question, isn't it? what ofcom is proposing - the question, isn't it? proposing here . the question, isn't it? what ofcom is proposing here is| the question, isn't it? what - ofcom is proposing here is that the competition and market authority will examine this market in depth. that enquiry could take at least six months, and then following that, depending on what the competition in markets authority finds, that could result in remedies, which could include orders to change business practices or even changes in the law.- business practices or even changes in the law. well, do ou changes in the law. well, do you think. — changes in the law. well, do you think, amazon - changes in the law. well, do you think, amazon and - changes in the law. well, do - you think, amazon and microsoft change their practices in the meantime to sort of pre—empt any regulation? meantime to sort of pre-empt any regulation?— meantime to sort of pre-empt any regulation? well, since the concerns of— any regulation? well, since the concerns of ofcom _ any regulation? well, since t

ofcom, way, have just ofcom, by the way, have just issued statement not so long ofcom, by the way, haveing it's1ent not so long ofcom, by the way, have just issuwsaying it's essentially long ofcom, by the way, have just issuwsaying it's essentially up|g ago saying it's essentially up to the individual broadcaster what or do. but there what they say or do. but there have been reports in the times in other that rapists could in other news that rapists could avoid prison from next week due to changes to sentencing guidelines as a result of the soaring prison population. this comes as the government sought to clear the court backlogs and even apparently floated the idea of housing prisoners abroad. given the fact that we can't even get anyone abroad at the moment if they've entered this country i would be country illegally, i would be amazed if we managed actually amazed if we managed to actually transport actual british citizens a foreign citizens to an abroad a foreign prison. but gb news understands that suspected offenders will be kept out on bail from monday. but it will only be crimin

we love ofcom.. we love ofcom. carry on. >> weren't about >> you weren't thinking about your >> you weren't thinking about you labour's rachel reeves denies >> labour's rachel reeves denies the apparent plagiarism over her new book. >> oh, rachel , this is so embarrassing. >> naughty, naughty. rachel >> naughty, naughty. rachel >> in this day and age of ai, you would have thought that she would understand if you would understand that if you just of stuff in from just put chunks of stuff in from elsewhere, to be elsewhere, it's not going to be long it's noticed. and it long before it's noticed. and it hasn't been long. so she's written this book, the women who made modern economics and in this book, an examination by the ft found more than 20 examples of passages from other sources that appear to have been lifted wholesale reworked minor wholesale or reworked with minor changes without acknowledgement. and , who are and her publisher, who are called basic books, which is just great, it? why not? just

ofcom wants there to be more competition? >> this is one of the questions that i asked ofcom as well, are there other competitors out there? it's harder to muscle in. amazon and microsoft offer a variety and a suite of products. if you're a business and now we're moving into this world of a.i., and you're thinking, well, i need some sort of a.i. product, maybe in the customer society, data processing, it's very difficult to build that yourself, so you need to go to a tech company to do that. now, what you're looking at what microsoft and amazon have done they've released effectively foundational models that allow companies to build a.i. products on top of it. if you're a business wanting an a.i. you can go to amazon and microsoft. i need this product. what can i build on? they have that ready-made. very few companies around will be able to compete with that. you look at the market, 80% of the market, huge, google it, a distant third. google, a distant third. so, when you look at that google as a potential competitor but when

this time the uk regulator ofcom has referred the cloud computing sector to the competition watchdog.t says it is worried that a lack of competition is harming consumers and businesses that store their data in the cloud. ofcom's concerns centre around amazon and microsoft, which it says have a combined market share of 70—80% in the uk. specifically ofcom says it's concerned about fees for moving data and technical barriers that can make it difficult to switch providers. and this is a big and growing business. the consultancy mckinsey estimates cloud computing could be worth $3tn by the end of this decade. microsoft said it was committed to competition and would engage with the uk inquiry and amazon said it believed ofcom's findings were "based on a fundamental misconception" of the sector and that the problems had been exxagerated. raoul lumb is a commercial technology lawyer with the london law firm simon muirhead & burton and when i spoke to i started by asking him to explain the importance of the cloud to modern life. i mean, you and me are using it now. so here i am. i'm talking t

so i have referred it to ofcom have now referred it to ofcom for them investigate.hem to investigate. they haven't confirmed yet that they are investigating i have are investigating it, but i have passed it on to them and hopefully or they hopefully they will do or they will their job. but hopefully they will do or they will theirjob. buti mean, will do theirjob. but i mean, it is a terrible system that the bbc can, effect sort of bore bbc can, in effect sort of bore people into submission. >> this a system >> do you think this is a system that face reform? that should face reform? obviously, channels are obviously, other channels are direct, highly regulated by ofcom, whereas the gets ofcom, whereas the bbc gets to mark homework first. it mark its own homework first. it should . should we change that should. should we change that system? well it's not fair. >> it's clearly fair , is it? >> it's clearly not fair, is it? it's clearly not. i mean, i don't think i think it's unjustifiable, really. i don't i'm not blaming ofcom here. they're rules. it's they're tied by

the letter to ofcom yesterday.aking was that the bbc has not shied away from referring to terrorists in the past. referring to terrorists in the past . why should it make an past. why should it make an exception for israel? >> well, that's right. i mean , >> well, that's right. i mean, our case really rests on three legs. there are three parts of it. first of all, as you said in your introduction, just the normal use of english language, the word terrorism word the word terrorism is the word which be used to describe the word terrorism is the word whithappened used to describe the word terrorism is the word whithappened on ed to describe the word terrorism is the word whithappened on saturday,:ribe the word terrorism is the word whithappened on saturday, may what happened on saturday, may 2nd. as a matter of english law, hamas is a terrorist organisation . they are organisation. they are proscribed as a matter of law here. support for them is illegal and i hope actually that the police will be stronger in in dealin

according to ofcom, amazon and microsoft have as much as 70% of the cloud market in the uk —

okay is it right to report bbc ofcom not report the to bbc ofcom for not calling me calling hamas terroristsughts. me or know your thoughts. email me or tweet me at gb news. and while you're there, vote in our you're there, go and vote in our poll. you the results poll. i'll bring you the results very, very but very, very shortly. but to debate now, am joined by debate this now, i am joined by former chief political former bbc chief political correspondent john sergeant and chairman of the national jewish assembly, gary mond , i will go assembly, gary mond, i will go to you first. jonathan i'll work my way down the line, as it were. so is the bbc right to not call a terrorist organisation terrorists? >> no, they certainly are . >> no, they certainly are. people, of course, find it difficult to follow this. lots of people do. they think it's obvious that us government call them terrorists . we've heard all them terrorists. we've heard all these people calling them terrorists . they don't seem to terrorists. they don't seem to understand the is understand that the bbc is operation operation in

50 committee and also, where are ofcom in all of this?— in all of this?mmittee on - in all of this? so this is the - advisory committee on business appointments. if you are a government minister in the uk, a former minister, you have to seek permission when you want a newjob. they say with this job on gb news, they don't see a particular concern, but he will have to follow rules. he cannot draw on any material he knew when he was prime minister, secret material, and he cannot lobby for gb news to the government. ofcom of course will be looking out for impartiality with this new role when borisjohnson interviews conservative politicians particularly.— conservative politicians particularly. conservative politicians articularl. ., ., particularly. thank you for taking us through _ particularly. thank you for taking us through that, _ particularly. thank you for taking us through that, we _ particularly. thank you for taking us through that, we are - particularly. thank you for taking us through that, we are almost l particularly. thank you for taking | us th

can we talk about ofcom now?roadcasting and rightly so. they do a good job, an important job. and there's talk of ofcom regulating the internet is that a good idea ? a good idea? >> it would be a great idea if it was possible . i just i read it was possible. i just i read that and i and i've looked into that and i and i've looked into that quite a bit and read. read what ofcom is supposed to do. i find myself in an interesting position here. mark in that a lot of colleagues i've known down the broadcasting years have ended up with ofcom shape ended up with ofcom in one shape or they're all very, or form and they're all very, very and very, very bright very good and very, very bright people i get into an people. i mean, get into an argument and discussion with some old chums now some of my old chums who now work and they've got work for ofcom and they've got all got a lot all the they've got a lot of answers which people like me find. quite, quite, find. they're quite, quite, quite good at sort of fending off crit

ofcom has teeth.y statute and it will deliver on complaints that are genuine and have merit. >> now it's had a lot of criticism recently . criticism recently. >> ofcom it's had some criticism, not least i have to say, in terms of what it's not doing with gb news free speech. we'll pass that one. we'll pass that one. so that's true . and it that one. so that's true. and it is under pressure because there are new broadcast stations which do appear to be very opinionated . and but that's a new issue for the press. we're talking about decades of people simply not having anywhere to go if they want to make a complaint, a genuine complaint. there is a real problem or there's a real abuse of editorial standards. and that's suing is not really an option. that's the other thing. if the newspaper tells blatant lies about you. yes if you've got the money, you can go to court. but how many people have actually got enough cash behind them? it costs a lot of money. do you know how many press inquiries we've had in

and ofcom, yes, our way through. and ofcom, yes, our good friends at ofcom.ra ofcom, director of online safety and yes, she said that the uk's support of israel is a vile colonial evil alliance and she has been suspended . well, joining me to suspended. well, joining me to discuss all of this down the line is rabbi rubenstein and, rabbi, the last time we spoke , rabbi, the last time we spoke, you just stood down as somebody that was was giving content to the bbc. it looks like your accusations of bias against the organisation can have proved to be wholly founded. the very tragically so . tragically so. >> it was astonishing in the clip before you managed to get one bbc person to admit that , one bbc person to admit that, um, that they sometimes have a problem saying the word terrorist. but no, but they say it. no, they don't. and john simpson, they put out john simpson, they put out john simpson himself on the bbc website explaining why they will not use the word terrorist when it comes to hamas or jews. but they use it for they use it for isis. we use it for

and ofcom, yes, our way through. and ofcom, yes, our good friends at ofcom.rira ofcom, director of online safety and yes, she said that the uk's support of israel is a vile colonial evil alliance and she has been suspended . well, joining me to suspended. well, joining me to discuss all of this down the line is rabbi rubenstein and, rabbi, the last time we spoke , rabbi, the last time we spoke, you just stood down as somebody that was was giving content to the bbc. it looks like your accusations of bias against the organisation can have proved to be wholly founded. the very tragically so . tragically so. >> it was astonishing in the clip before you managed to get one bbc person to admit that , one bbc person to admit that, um, that they sometimes have a problem saying the word terrorist. but no, but they say it. no, they don't. and john simpson, they put out john simpson, they put out john simpson himself on the bbc website explaining why they will not use the word terrorist when it comes to hamas or jews. but they use it for they use it for isis. we use it f

and then they decided whether to refer themselves ofcom . i mean, it themselves to ofcom.tely unbelievable. i am honestly getting to the stage . honestly getting to the stage. i'm break the law and i'm about to break the law and not renew bbc licence. i am not renew my bbc licence. i am so fed up. i'm not advocating anyone else does it? >> but you shouldn't be saying, look, i am so fed up with it. there are ways that you can you know, watch tv without having to pay know, watch tv without having to pay the licence, which are perfectly legitimate . it perfectly legitimate. it wouldn't be a tv. i think it's a monitor, i'm not going to give. >> just say i didn't >> i'd just like to say i didn't do it without you. i didn't i didn't watch that newsnight programme in real time , as it programme in real time, as it were, i watch were, because i don't watch newsnight. the point? were, because i don't watch nev notght. the point? were, because i don't watch nevnotght. it. the point? were, because i don't watch nevnotght. it. i the point? were, because i don't watch nevnotght. it. i

this time the uk regulator ofcom has referred the cloud computing sector to the competition watchdog.s and businesses that store their data in the cloud. ofcom's concerns centre around amazon and microsoft, which it says have a combined market share of 70—80% in the uk.

thousands of people complained to the media regulator ofcom which already found the broadcaster broke to host a show on gb news but he is the most recognisable. forthe news but he is the most recognisable. for the channel, news but he is the most recognisable. forthe channel, hopes of higher ratings. for the former pm, exposure and the fee that is likely to be significant. shaun dilley, bbc news. with the government planning to add american xl bullys to the list of banned dog breeds, the bbc has learned that there are 3,500 dogs from the four breeds which are already banned living legally with their owners — and the number is increasing. our correspondent danny savage explains why banning a breed may not necessarily be a straighforward solution to the issue of dangerous dogs. an xl bully—type dog with a temperament problem. this animal was handed to police after it attacked its owner. it can never be rehomed and will be put down. i'm a dog lover. i don't want to see dogs put down, but i'm also a dad and i've got to think about public safety, you know? and is it right for a dog that ha

we're witnessing is terrorism and four of the uk's most senior lawyers complained to the regulator ofcomaccusing the bbc of abandoning impartiality. a substantial majority of newswatch viewers agreed with them, including yvonne nazareth, who wrote... abdul mohammed agreed... but chris from newcastle had a different view... it's not the first time the bbc has been involved in a row over the use of the t—word following the brighton bomb of 1984. the then prime minister, margaret thatcher, put pressure on the bbc, which it resisted to refer to the ira as terrorists. but since then the corporation has used that term in describing the brighton bomber, patrick mcgee, and in relation to the bomb attacks in london in 2005 and manchester in 2017. so why not on this occasion? two people sent us videos asking that question. ramon, ferreira and first, wendy. according to the terrorism act, hamas is a proscribed terrorist organisation. terminology matters. it colours how we think and respond. the term militant is inadequate. it's a euphemism. it avoids the responsibility of calling out terrorism for

she then went on to become a regulator as head of ofcom with no real retail experience.re surprised by her appointment. under her, the chair took a more executive chairman role, a bit more hands on. in the old days, you would have a managing director of waitrose and a managing director ofjohn lewis. that was kind of consolidated a little bit and she kind of took on that structure. it hasn't particularly worked. now, to be fair to her, obviously we had a pandemic that was thrown at her and also the worst cost—of—living crisis we've seen since the second world war, so a very difficult environment in which to operate. this is the scene in new york, a few minuting a of former president donald trump appearing at that new york courthouse, for this, the beginning of what is a civil fraud trial. lots of speculation about what it means for his business empire, now you will know, we have been reporting extensively about those accusations he inflated the value of properties within the business by more than $2 billion. last week, a judge in the city ruling that mr trump was liable f

and no choice when it comes to choosing a provider and ofcom says that these hyper scalars of combined7%. and aside for security attack caused widescale disruption and delays to the operations. the company has 75 to 35 cents in the first quarter and the 30th of september. and often touted as the technology that could speed up the technology that could speed up the transport of goods, save time, money as well as energy but how close are we to utilising them for everyday tasks. in denmark when energy provider and transport firm are trying deliveries to offshore wind farms and adrian murray headed out into the scene between denmark and sweden to watch the first test flight at the top of the turbine. this battery powered drone is headed towards a wind farm with spare parts. taking offer much like a helicopter and can carry kilos up helicopter and can carry kilos up to 100 km at once in the air, the trunk finds its way autonomously and checking its journey on boat and. intelligent path planning and where it is coming from where it should approach the turbine from an empathic one specific pa

been reported to ofcom their refusal call ofcom have been reported to ofc(hamas their refusal call ofcom(hamas grouprefusal call ofcom have been reported to ofc(hamas group afusal call ofcom have been reported to ofc(hamas group a terroristcall the hamas group a terrorist organisation. five lawyers, organisation. now five lawyers, an mp and an mp, have written to the regulator and accused the broadcaster of failing to show impartiality beyond doubt and urging ofcom to investigate the bbc and even now the broadcaster is embroiled in even more impartiality rules after its journalist appeared to be justifying the killing of israeli civilians by hamas. the bbc say it is urgently investigating claims of any anti—israel bias displayed by several of its journalists in the middle east as their office was vandalised by pro—palestinian protest groups. so i'm asking other bbc writers staying stuck in their ways , staying stuck in their ways, refusing to use the word terrorist when describing hamas, and just to put this into context, they have refused to call the ira terrorists , and call the ira te

. >> going to have to push >> so i'm going to have to push back for ofcom balance this early yeah whatd early in the show. yeah what did you it? a one world death. you call it? a one world death. >> a one world death cult. is that don't. is that the that they don't. is that the problem we've got problem is we've got a population in collapse that's happening . there's going to be happening. there's going to be way many people like in way too many old people like in like, think 20% of chinese like, i think 20% of the chinese of japanese population is of the japanese population is above 20, 80 years old. yeah, they need we need we're not having enough children and we're not enough children to not having enough children to take of them. and we're take care of them. and we're importing people. you think importing people. and you think the are imported, the the people who are imported, the migrants take the people who are imported, the migrof ts take the people who are imported, the migrof the take the people who are imported, the migrof the older take the people who are imported, the migrof

we have rwanda rulings, ofcom rulings and news radio show . radio show. >> welcome back to headliners. i'm simon evans, still with josh howie and leo kearse. let's crack on josh with the daily mail now you have precisely 90s to demonstrate why this is or is not a good idea. yeah, illegal migrants to be given only 30 minutes to prove they're ineligible to be deported to rwanda under new home office plans. >> obviously we have a massive backlog. new laws come in at backlog. the new laws come in at the presently. i think you get about 60 to 90 minutes. that's going be cut down to 30 going to be cut down to 30 minutes. then only going minutes. then you're only going to then get days to get then you get eight days after to present your case. after that to present your case. obviously, are obviously, people are protesting, protesting, but protesting, not protesting, but there people who are there are people who are criticising number criticising it, saying, number one, don't english one, if you don't speak english as language, then as the first lang

, people ofcom, not because the people that concern now about that express concern now about gb newson lines have had absolutely no issues at all with polarisation of all with the polarisation of political debate in this country. >> the balance was tipped >> when the balance was tipped the opposite direction, for example, were example, panel debates were skewed majority skewed in terms of majority of remainers and perhaps one took and brexiteer that kind of representation, that kind of opinion, all rest. that was absolutely fine . and now that absolutely fine. and now that actually i always pick brexit as the as the polarising , you know, the as the polarising, you know, topic, it seems that's what we're discussing now on this channel. for example, a brexiteer would be given a fair heanng brexiteer would be given a fair hearing and i would argue that that's sometimes one of the first times that that's fairly happenedin first times that that's fairly happened in broadcasting. then all of a sudden the criticism comes all look at these people . comes all look at these people. they shoul

we know we are off ofcom regulated . every are off ofcom regulated.ry broadcaster is in this country and for someone like adam boulton, who i used to have a huge amount of respect for, can come out and say that it should be shut down. and then he said the same thing on another broadcast or two, and i'm just scratching my head here because i thought no one was watching gb news news. so are so bothered? >> indeed. i mean, diane, did you think. hang on a minute, adam. you've gone far. adam. you've gone way too far. bbc, newsnight. way bbc, newsnight. you've gone way too mean, i've seen more too far. i mean, i've seen more balance on chinese communist party assembly. you know what the bbc's always been like this, though. >> i don't know the amount of time you see. i do a lot of driving as a comic and the amount of times i'm sat in the car and the news comes on and i'm yelling at the radio, that's not news. that's the bbc internal email. like the recently the top story on radio four was about, oh , now, thanks four was about, oh, now, thanks to the gary li

for ofcom reasons, say something after someone spoken.s been on has had when lewis has been on has had to so but my favourite to do that. so but my favourite bit is she's apologised as well. shirley apologised. shirley ballas has apologised. she i apologise for my she said i apologise for my comments. i did not know tasers were in the uk, she got were illegal in the uk, she got a there's no way she's a taser. there's no way she's not. if you're going into a handbag, don't earth. not. if you're going into a harthat, don't earth. not. if you're going into a harthat was1't earth. not. if you're going into a harthat was my earth. not. if you're going into a harthat was my favourite bit as >> that was my favourite bit as well. just i didn't realise well. i just i didn't realise tailors weren't legal in the uk. and me, i have and if you'll excuse me, i have to home very quickly to drive home very quickly and get the unless you want get to the skip. unless you want to tasers. that's what to buy 200 tasers. that's what i took for that. what do yo

the narrative uh should be impartial, and it should be set in a particular direction, and obviously ofcom came in only in 2003 to actually said these rules and regulations for people to have the right to not even be biased and not actually portray certain things in the media that we seen today, which is actually quite surprising due to the regulations that are out there, and again we're not just seeing international laws being broken, we seeing our own regulations and policies being set aside and now they're backtracking, but the damage that's done in between is quite alarming, especially when we've got lives at risk and people are obviously attached to story, they will even if the news is not really reported in the correct manner and way, then obviously there's repercussions of that in the same minute and second and and again it's costing lives as we know, so i think that we need to understand media that as much as we might we might think that oh you know it is fair and it's just, but the people that actually behind the scenes that own it, if you go into the history and and understanding

as much as the narrative uh should be impartial and should be set a particular direction, obviously ofcom came in only 2003 to actually set these rules and regulations for people to have the right to not even be biased, not actually portray certain things in the media that we've seen today, which is actually quite surprising due to the regulations that are out there, and again we're not just international laws being broken, we see our regulations and policies being set aside and now they're backtracking, but the damage that's done in between is quite alarming, especially when we've got lives at risk and people are obviously attached to story, they will even if the news is not really reported in the correct manner way, then obviously there's repercussions of that in the same minute and second and and again it's costing lives as we know, so i think that we understand media that as much as we might we might think that oh you know it's fair and it's just but the people that actually behind these that own it, if you go into the history and and understanding where it comes from, it's a politica

so as was going echo what our guest be saying, the impartiality, the actual rules and regulations, ofcom you know regulates and obviously it's really firm is definitely you know not actually doing job and people are advised to actually complain and put you know letters and complaints out there for certain things like this because you would have expected the forum challenge especially stopping him exactly there and then and say at least say wait a minute yes yes exactly so very very much open to discussion as to definitely there's an agenda, we know that there's only few individuals that do own these um like media, platforms and presence, and that's what's being out there regardless of how they think that they seem to be know sort of non-bias and non-judgemental, but obviously it's it's completely different when we actually look at mainstream, well it's having an impact and one of the impacts here is about people in the political sphere saying, my government and the opposition not speak for me, let's just put that new tweet up um from a muslim counselor. shall we say a former muslim couns

, some very ofcom, by some very, very prominent barristers saying, for goodness sake, just look at the act of 2000. look at what the definitions of this are, what is going on now? john simpson, bbc veteran , has simpson, bbc veteran, has defended this by saying are but if we call them terrorists, it means we're taking sides . well, means we're taking sides. well, roger bolton is a bbc veteran radio four presenter, panorama editor and now does his own podcast called beeb. watch. roger we know with every big issue the bbc will get criticised for whatever it says or whatever it does , but it or whatever it does, but it seems in this case case that the barbara ism that was committed on israeli soil, i don't see how the bbc can't describe that as being terrorists. >> it can and it has described it as being a terrorist act. but there's a difference between talking about the acts themselves and then labelling themselves and then labelling the hamas terrorist the organisation hamas terrorist organisation. the reason the organisation. now the reason the bbc doesn't do that is it's a bbc, it's a

, some very ofcom, by some very, very prominent barristers saying, for goodness sake, just look at the act of 2000. look at what the definitions of this are, what is going on now? john simpson, bbc veteran , has simpson, bbc veteran, has defended this by saying are but if we call them terrorists, it means we're taking sides . well, means we're taking sides. well, roger bolton is a bbc veteran radio four presenter, panorama editor and now does his own podcast called beeb. watch. roger we know with every big issue the bbc will get criticised for whatever it says or whatever it does , but it or whatever it does, but it seems in this case case that the barbara ism that was committed on israeli soil, i don't see how the bbc can't describe that as being terrorists. >> it can and it has described it as being a terrorist act. but there's a difference between talking about the acts themselves and then labelling themselves and then labelling the hamas terrorist the organisation hamas terrorist organisation. the reason the organisation. now the reason the bbc doesn't do that is it's a bbc, it's a

it and challenge that, it's just very one-sided, very biased, not being partial, impartial like how ofcom regulations do stay. so as you know our guest was mentioning earlier we do need to call these things out and actually help them you know enforce their own rules indeed and i know i'm not sure if you wanted me to mention this but i will anyway you are one of the people leading the charges to make sure one of our former barriers actually does what needs to happen through our own laws through the own mechanisms we have yes i have a good fund me campaign that can actually raise funds to actually uh put this to court uh for uh few individuals including keys dalma emily thornberry. benchapero and um you know basic and now we're going to jump into your gaza under attack program there to take you to a pro-palestinian rally live there in duka bangladesh this is one of hundreds of similar rallies we have witnessed over the past three weeks in a complete opposition to the israeli bombardment and indescriminant bombing of the beseest god the strip the slaughtering and what many of you have, you c

according to ofcom research . so first of all, research.t of all, i don't know these survey participants, a bunch of snowflake and wet blankets. maybe they found them from one of my comedy crowds. >> that could only be 1 or 2 people. it's 115 people that they interviewed. all of them from goldsmiths university. >> probably like that. yeah, because go to these people, because you go to these people, especially are the because you go to these people, especially if these are the millennials and you say , okay, millennials and you say, okay, we are looking for offensive material and they find everything offensive now. >> so if anyone hasn't seen it, a recurring character called linda flint, who describes whoever's sitting in front of her to somebody you don't see on the phone. and basically the description because she works at a and she's a lefty a university and she's a lefty and she's racist or she's being racist, trying not to be racist, but trying not to be racist. how can . i describe him? racist. how can. i describe him? he's he's a littl

we're regulated by ofcom , taken off the air by ofcom, taken off the air by these left leaning what theythe applied country, some of the labour who had labour politicians who had pretty enforced this ban pretty much enforced this ban without asking anyone . the without asking anyone. the problem was no one wanted to speak to me, only the tories wanted to vent their their fury. but interesting , this goes but it's interesting, this goes back march. but it's interesting, this goes bacso march. but it's interesting, this goes bacso labour. but it's interesting, this goes bacso labour member jenny >> so labour member jenny rathbone, she called in march for gb news to be banned from all internal tvs in the senate because we supposedly broadcast, quote unquote hateful views. >> the incident, the unfortunate incident that took place here a couple of weeks ago, a month or so ago, whenever it was, they've pounced and used it as pounced on that and used it as an excuse to wipe us off the air. and it was interesting. i was still outside the parliament today, peered through the reception in. but rec