and certainly those of us have ofcome from legacy newspapers never have those kinds -- with the opportunities to disseminate information and tell stories in those ways. it also allowed a lot of people to have a voice who previously did not have a voice. it allowed a tremendous amount of access to experts who perhaps were not being called upon. it allowed us to disseminate our information to an enormous number of people that we could not before. and then on the downside significant downside the internet. that is it has allowed the spread of an enormous number of so-called media outlets or outlets of one sort of another are spreading misinformation, disinformation outright conspiracy theories such that today we have no shared set of facts in our societies today. it's worse than that we cannot agree on how to establish that something where the elements we need in order to establish something as a fact. that is potentially catastrophic danger. to society as a whole but certainly to democracy. of course to the process but society and democracy are bigger than the press. quick to give the same answ

ofcom, that is because no matter what they do, they seem to come under fire.hink they help themselves though. >> okay. what do you think about this? >> yeah. i think it's no surprise that the bbc is basically perceived or i guess openly seems to be like pro—eu or these sort of agendas, because a lot of people within the bbc, whether it's presenters or people at senior figures, have these views and i think quite naturally, as much as we like to say, you know, any organisation should be impartial, humans famously are not. so they end up pushing the way they feel. so unless we get rid of those people and get people who maybe a bit half and half with their beliefs, i think that's going to continue. >> okay. yeah. fair enough. well, our next question is from mike. >> hi, josh. hey. should french gynaecologists be forced to try to examine parts that don't exist? >> yeah. wow. so this is the story of a french gynaecologist, doctor victor aquarian. and he was suspended from practising for a month for refusing to treat trans women, saying he is only trained to treat re

ofcom's alleged refusal to investigate pro—eu bias in bbc coverage of brexit., this is. >> yeah, i mean, going on without any evidence, of course, and purely for satire, i would say personal opinion that the bbc, ofcom are very much in the bbc's pocket. the evidence i would anecdotally present is that they are very pro—palestine, pro—eu. ofcom know the bbc, so a station, an output that's supposed to represent the whole of the uk. yeah. >> i've got to say ofcom are not here to defend themselves. >> they're 1543 00:08:2