resources and access that they have to defend colleagues around the world who may not have that same kind ofpport. and i still think it works. it works in different ways, but i think that the fact that an attack on a journalist anywhere in the world will be covered, it will be covered and initially by advocacy groups, like us, but we have the ability to make it into a more general news story. and it may not be just one story that goes out on the water. it may be that story triggers interest on social media which triggers more local coverage and it's more diffuse, but it definitely still has an impact and i see that as i travel around and engage with governments all over the world. >> so advocacy on behalf of of the ideals and the treatments, the ideals of journalism stands for, is a proxy for the people, is appropriate, but you expressed some discomfort about journalists who are also advocates for other kinds of freedom and the rules are a little more blended. i mean, a little more confused. i'm not a journalist covering something, i might be a journalisjournalist covering itm when i'm off i'm go