ex my ntst guesa have oftotal w 19 dorldbloutce duhch onampis.ship er (cheaps and )plausehe itre wr h theindco-fouersil lalea litt s andanhaqunah d,floye please welcomfloydli whay, s at iledoubch dutnd a er whide d i ctomem? fro w >> mell,ofost theeo pple t don' twantveo gi t ushere t specsaand t'y is a s bportutit 's a spo.rtit 's twoop resur tnedo int aneg gea bter shape andne o or twope reople a inhe td midleum jpingup nd an dowou thrgh thees rop. te >> shaphen: s itn beeun arod ng a loe. tim>> 5 abouts0 yearow n. ph>> steisen: it literallytc du h.ou >> dtcble du h. te>> s:phenow w, i't can ag imdoine iingitt whoo wden sclog on.is p itdlayell ar ovetheld wor? a >>vell oher t w.orld>> ph steen:'r youeea defting s teamfroman jap? ld>> worio champns. s (cheerapand seplau)an dhy wid d youou fnd the team?>> ph steen:?weta srtedum jping theogetr hias cnldre wwehen wereiv feye arsld o.to avwe hene beum jping tghhrou enelem, tary shighl,choole col ged anuswe jt had a bigis vion for ub doutle dndch a we started ourn owng thi aalnd cl it f theloydli dttleeoublut dch.we e havso poin, ivy, ya

that if we add in the people who have already been prosecuted and have left the prison, that is a as oftotalf 15 people the 779 men that have been held, slightly less than 2% of the entire population of the prison. cost, thens that has damage it has done to america's credibility for a country that believes in fairness, what a shocking statistic. 10 men. facing trials 49 others, this is the area i would hope that the president will put his foot down -- and speed things up. these are people that are facing the periodic review board. the latest of many review processes that have been set for guantanamo over the years. the periodic review board process was established in 2013. it was established as a result of a decision taken by president obama's task force in 2009. this category of men who were called to dangerous release, but the administration and knowledge they had insignificant evidence to them on trial. that means to me that if you have not got evidence, you don't have a case. fundamentally i think that is true. whom are people against what was supposed to be evidence produced that were n