ogi, you have a rebuttal. >> i do not have any reason to doubt the police services that went to the site with the minor in terms of what transpired. i am glad the appellant has not denied the fact that they did sell cigarettes to minors. sell cigarettes to minors. it is strange the did not even

xuzibu@xuzibu@@ c rewec m1ay have more in 1 and by bnsf railway.xuzibu by tn sciencxue,zi tbuechnol@ogyeracy innoc rec 1 and with the oand xuzibu@noc rec i publ@noc rec 1 tation from viewers like you. 1xuzibu@ yuzibu@ xuzibu@no@noc rec 1rec u noc bu acce@ss.wgbnoh.c orregc 1 c r1 >> rose: welcocome to our progr. to want, a conversation with the prime minist of israel, benjamin netanyahu, at the conclusion of a dramatic wee at the united nations inwhich the palestinians made an applicati

ogi, you have a rebuttal. >> i do not have any reason to doubt the police services that went to the site with the minor in terms of what transpired. i am glad the appellant has not denied the fact that they did sell cigarettes to minors. it is strange the did not even ask for the id. the way he was told, the clerk was told that the minor was not 18. he went ahead to sell the cigarette. i think they should take responsibility for the action of their agent. i am going to respectfully ask the court to deny the appeal until probably 25 days have closed. >> commissioners, the matter is submitted. vice president garcia: i am tired of hearing myself might the same argument over and over again. ever since this ceased to be a police operation and became department of public health, i think department of public health for some reason has blinders on when it comes to the economic effect of the penalties that are assessing on these particular businesses. i think if the facts as presented were accurate, the police department made a mistake, in that the decoy should have said i am not of age. it is no

byron ogis of mckenzie and company, the global consults firm. recently he wrote a revealing analysis of the country's employment predicament, looking at the past, present and future. he's not only going to tell us what's going on, he's going to show us. byron? >> thanks, fareed. let's go all the way back to the recession of 1948. the u.s. lost jobs in that recession. people were laid off. but within six months of gdp recovering, those jobs were back. the same pattern held for the next 40 years of recessions and recovery. people were laid off. the economy recovered and they were hired back. it took about six months for jobs to return to their prereregistration levels after gdp is. something changed in the early '90s. after the recession of 1990 it took 15 months from the time gdp recovered until the time that jobs recovered. more than twice as long. and we saw that doubling again in the 2001 recession. in that recovery, it took 39 months for jobs to recover after gdp had already recovered to prerecession levels. and how are we doing now? not well

neo iganout wo to ak the iste t ts kindf th is portion t intremt, ti-h an ghts rtn em ti-rigio -h ide ogy tsat -riodey perpuatethisype teoris rp>> hte impistante s ito exse tour teis hmpntitex hocri toesow scere theyre. ckedp w hithri aes his soryre of ey. ostiedtes,porn gazihs, i isy f an, ese ys on't lve t tis,n zilife inhic , te y't p ttray emsefeesic where tey le and p ay diby he seh e lran.nd yodiar aoluty rit and whatn.e ha t rem beryo i autriotnd onlyatreha tir t psonaemcoder it cessily lyweak tut pheynaede al vermuchgain tir o ssy llowusli.y alerchin t o onof t owargeli popatns at sfers rom onis k td ofge extropis ideatogy re srsm kofusli trdey who ese eemisli belve n'tonfo t o heeight kin eislaisel it not usttfohrisans d htin west nersho sfer omla the itottiss strs sr he terristsit'speeabl vinguslill aundhe rrworlts's whope dbl't ant ng tli a condrm rl to thoir d eremi tidonlogy >> tt's ght. d on of t t thisb eoutmihis id gyguy,hile e's t bes t. app entlon t hi tasn outills or y,lensbepp ytlemen ta ouis rninle w brnnhe y unened s tes. in was bor w b inew micond he un s s. wa ou k