to russia unless it does the right thing john let's go to you ok i'll ask you ok is it seems to me it seems to me that he knows i'm in history did nato intend to attack russia that's a historical fact ok well can you prove that russia was really it was the soviet union didn't attack western europe ok let's move forward gentlemen john i would say the. nato caved to russia it needs russia more ok if it's going to bail itself out of this horrific war in afghanistan maybe they'll just you know they won't they won't call it a defeat that's the whole best they can hope for right now is calling it a defeat ok maybe a withdrawal or whatever whatever newspeak they want to use but the war is lost ok and russia might help them get out not stay. yeah yeah i totally agree i mean that's why the whole obama reset was was called into operation because they realized that the americans realize that the confrontation with russia was leading nowhere and on afghanistan and on iran they needed russian help so i completely agree with you i don't agree that russia needs nato at all on the contrary nato is a

i mean those kind of institutions are considered fact by the right ok obviously ok kelly what do you think i mean absolutely but i was i got to tell kelly what do you think i mean do you think that the as he's going to be a sacred cow i mean keep the war is going i mean to keep spending on to going to support the troops type thing and all that i mean in just a couple for countless billions of dollars into and i again i want to talk to mr karzai in a little while but into war that we did we're not getting any return on. well i think before the even before the election you saw a great hesitancy by members of this so-called tea party movement to talk about the fence cuts it seems like a popular notion behind the scenes but publicly there is a great hesitancy to talk about defense cuts within the republican party. and i think after the election now that republicans are in control of the house at least there is going to be even greater has a tendency to talk about cuts congressman bob mccann who is taking over the house armed services committee came out with a sort of short list of what h

and so let me let me get my point and first of all ok ok we define the wealthy in the united states in terms of tax brackets those families that make two hundred fifty thousand or more which is certainly not a millionaire ok this is the sector of the economy of the economic structure this is the one that creates all the jobs if you want to kill the golden goose kill the golden goose we see what happens you threaten to kill the golden goose of the last two years with hostile tax and regulatory policy and guess what they're sitting on the regs they're not laying new eggs so they're no well it's all ninety dollars. and talk. well i mean it's not only the law that's going to raise the anger and hurt but look at the reality go ahead mark and. why is that why is that the countries that don't have obamacare as the big guns the don't have u.s. regulatory changes maybe sort of twenty three of them or twenty four of them suffered in the financial crisis on certainty if it's really the regulatory and policy changes that in america that everyone's worried about if you're trying to explain twent

vivian: it's ok. hey, it's ok. you loved her. it's right to grieve. ok? it's ok.that someone might find out the baby could be mine? natalie: brody, i don't know. i have gone on for so long being so sure that this is john's baby, i feel like if i got a paternity test, it would just...be tempting fate. natalie: what's this? brody: dr. wright wanted to get a head start. she ran my dna last week. these are the results. you do a test, you can just compare it to what's here. john: trick or treat. what did i miss? [knock on door] cole: let him in. james: i'm sorry. cole: were you followed here? james: no, the cops tried, but i lost them. cole: are you sure? james: yeah, positive. i know how to lose a tail. starr: well, sorry. it's just a really big risk, you coming here. james: well, i wouldn't have come, but i would have taken a really big risk calling. you guys, mcbain's onto me. starr...starr, really, i'm sorry. i'm sorry. he knew i was lying. ok? he's going to be looking for you, too. starr: ok, thank you. james: you need anything? cole starr: we really appreciate ev

we shouldn't overlook the incredibly important achievement of the first nuremberg trial ok i'd like to go back to the selectiveness of international justice a little bit later how about you bill what is the most important precedent you think that nuremberg left us today and i think what all of us agree maybe on at least one point if it is a work in progress do you think bill. well i do think i agree with douglas that set a very important precedent there is a direct connection between the nuremberg trials after world war two and the genocide convention of one thousand nine hundred forty eight and the universal declaration of human rights in the same year. and ultimately the establishment of the i.c.c. on the other hand you have to note the fact that the nuremberg trials were carried out by the victors of world war two. and that means that it's not going to be a precedent that's going to be carried out by countries that are not victors or they're not great powers and all of the individuals who had been brought before the i.c.c. . are are not in power they were out of power and therefore

congratulate no intelligence i asked him to tell us know what you need to see what he's doing have ok i've been trying to shout over me now it's ok well no there's no argument means we shout over you know if we're not going to go anywhere we don't move forward michael go i'll go to you how do you feel about peace in the public realm i mean basically words of saying we should get rid of the head of this organization and shut it down and that's what we're hearing and i'm asking everyone for their reaction to that go ahead well my reaction peter is. you know. did did what wiki leaks do was it legal or illegal that's exactly where i want to go in this program keep going if if it was if it was if it was illegal it seems to me that the u.s. government would would be pressing charges i know they're talking about that but i don't see that happening and the other thing is that you know assange however p. pronounces his name i probably am saying it wrong but he doesn't have a security clearance he's not bound by any security you clearance or anything like that to not do what he did now i'm not

exit polls they had span ago was higher with early turnout than it was in the entire last election ok that may explain it also helps when you're going to have a dream bag vote and i want to go to iowa now ok now i hope you're going to be in the middle that's why we want as you the very go looking at the campaign here. in an outside observer and i sometimes i think outside observer outside the country being an irishman you know going to give a unique perspective go ahead what was your perspective on the election results here and the inevitability in parentheses and where i think there was a lot to be said for the argument. and yeah i think there's a lot to be said really for the argument that the thing that precipitated this kind of republican sweep was principally the state of the economy i mean if people don't have a job it doesn't really matter so much what the minutia of the policy is if you're the government and i'll be asleep the democrats hailed both the white house and both houses of congress until tuesday you're going to get blamed when conditions are not as they should be i t

that money had to go somewhere you had a classic bubble ok ok all right but you had a lot of people on wall street that went through it just far and get paid or you know ahead go ahead go ahead steve. peter i mean you know look there's always excuses for why it's not actually a lack of regulation that caused all kind of sorts of things from the tea party folks you know i don't disagree with peter's earlier comment that it who cares you know really who's funding it i just want some transparency and why the tea party was created you know and who it was designed to serve from the very beginning if we had honesty about that i wouldn't care about any other topic and i saw a lot of them going to have this election no one will say it people say it doesn't matter people say it doesn't matter but i think it does matter and i think that's really what people are going to be talking about after this election i can't wait for the tea party elected candidates to have to put up or shut up that is my consolation with this election. and i'm going to. they're going to be absolutely they're going to b

of the tea partiers i mean this is what a lot of people are worried about you have gridlock anyway ok now you have this extra element so if i go to you forward about that what about your fellow republicans drinking tea are you worried about them are they going to go along with you to get along with jordi. why don't you i don't think you know the big question washington right now is will the tea party you know take over the republican party no i do not see that but what i do see a lot of the tea party candidates that have been newly elected to congress doing is sort of serving as our fiscal conscience they will keep us on the straight and narrow and if we stray from it they're going to let everybody know they're also going to be pretty hard on a lot of moderate democrats folks like joe manchin and west virginia as well ok what do you think about that bob i mean do you see do you look forward to i mean on a positive sense obviously that the tea partiers are just going to make sure that nothing happens to forward the obama agenda into the presidential election in two thousand and twelve

everybody's saying you know the main issue is what do we do with this information now that it's out ok i mean it's interesting i mean i want to be fair on this program i'm not waiving of what i know i might look i'm not waving a flag for this type of behavior i'm being very neutral and i think julian assange if i could quote him right now i enjoy crushing bastards that's why he said he did it joe how do you react to that. so i think he's a guy who has a flair for the dramatic i actually think he's someone who maybe is part crusader and and part publicity seeker but here is back just for a moment the question can you shut them down well what laws is he violated more specifically who's laws this is an amorphous international organization which i think everyone agrees is opaque no one really knows exactly who they are i mean ironically right that the transparency organization has no transparency in and of itself but we don't know what countries they operate out of it what's that work they have their service and and does it matter because they can just move their servers to another country

not ok but even the g. twenty itself i mean how transparent is it in and really who sets the agenda and i i have my suspicions who sets the agenda of the united states. wants to a race to the bottom to bail itself out at the expense of the rest of the world they're not thinking about you know the the global international system only to with their interest involved and that's why the g. eight in my opinion is a real short has a real short coming because the united states is not going to take any pain it won't because it doesn't have to what do you think about that. it's not it's not up to the united states. since nine hundred forty five we have what is called a global financial architecture based on the britain woods institution those institutions back to the u.s. dollar the u.s. dollar was supposed to be backed up by convertible currency and know that it was dead in the one nine hundred seventy is that gave rise to the g. eight the death of the brits would compromise and the nixon devaluation no the two tho

commissioner meko: ok. thanks. >> jocelyn, i just might add that in your pursuit of coordinating some type of educational process or interaction between the clubs and the police department, you moot want to check into the monthly -- you might want to check into the monthly meetings they already have at most police stations and might bring the clubs in on that, the permit officers will probably be there. as well as members of the public. and you can address the issues there and it's already agendaized and scheduled. it might save you a lot of time and motion. something worth checking out. it may not work. i don't know. ok. anything else? any public comments on the director's report? seeing none, the next item i believe is going to be police department comments and questions. and fellow commissioners, i just move this in the agenda because it seems that the police dovetail into what roj has to say so i thought it would be more effective to have him follow. thank you. >> good evening, commissioners and staff.

of ground president they're going to need to compete in these areas in the mid to long term as well ok peter brown in orlando so it cuts both ways doesn't it i mean it makes the rich some republicans electable otherwise being branded as a. in the post bush years would have been otherwise and. it actually. divides the republican party at the same time so if this point time you can cut both ways for the republican party well i would i would tend to argue that what we know is we know we know about the short term in the short term you're going to have much more energized republican turnout on tuesday and that's going to help the republicans and to a large degree the tea party folks get some credit for that weather down the road it creates friction within the party or make some point makes the republicans west electable in some places we'll see it's interesting to note however that frankly the modern way of the republican party has been shrinking for years so the notion that that that they are competitive part of the republican party just frankly isn't true. the republican party's future is

and if i can put it on that rubric ok so i'm not a ten i was talking about ten years right all right what we need even though we can know that we're ok by clinton all right fine and i and i don't break right there at all mary ok gary and so what if what is the palestinians got out of that how much they control of the west bank how much closer are they to their own your midst no i don't know if i'm going to get in right now i mean we need to have their time here missing we need to have this air your laser professors from my point you know i this is my point sunday putting it into the room worrying about us well i'm just putting it under that i have doing that my point ok talking about what the israelis offered in two thousand and two thousand and one final would that point and we go all the way back to oslo to wasting time here gideon from oslo to two thousand to what have the palestinians got in due respect to professor dershowitz his comment there what have they gotten out of this peace process. i think we should get back to the basics and the basics issues that it is ok to pry into