my interlocutors today are oleg kadkov, a military expert and editor-in-chief of the defect express agency. analytics is now a serviceman of the special operations forces of the armed forces of ukraine vyacheslav i am glad to see you good day and the first question is actually for you vyacheslav whether you are actually true to the thesis that in the development and use of artillery of nato countries from the usa on the one hand and the soviet union and the russian federation, on the other hand, used completely different approaches to artillery. they made different bets on this segment of the armament. if we put it simply, then you can say there , uh, the adversaries confessed that the effectiveness, accuracy works on preemption and the russian federation, the cherliansky union, the strategy of such a barrage of fire in order to destroy everything in a row, regardless of the number of ammunition than the accuracy of the hit, are such assessments correct in the approach of the concept in a certain way, yes, that is, if the nato artillery there prevails in quality over quantity, then the sov