combination, it was not for nothing that this proposal was made, but it was not for nothing that oleksandr tkachenkoed it up, well, that is, but i all these combinations, i don't buy them, neither live nor... well, i picked it up because it seemed right to me, but in fact it was wrong, and when my colleagues stood up and started saying: the committee of to the committee, yes, and all the people there are very difficult and very independent, and you can put pressure on them well, it is simply impossible, i repeat it all, yes , i repeat it many times, these are very worthy people with bad characters in the best sense of the word and with reputations, but they said, no, this is wrong, because we are undermining the trust in the award, which so trust in society is very weak. and here is my question, do you think this is actually the fate of these state awards, that there will always be, there will always be arguments from people who suspect, there will always be these suspicions, or if you had not made this mistake, and the award would have continued was notoriously not damaged beyond suspicion and it w

it's been seven months since oleksandr tkachenko's resignation. names of many ministers, because even if you kill me, i won't name the minister of ecology, i don't know who the minister of ecology is , or the name of the minister of social policy that i visually remember what she looks like, but this is a unique experience in general, such that, including political experts and political journalists, they are just five or six managers remember and that's all, although the power in ukraine is big enough, that is, it's state committees, and ministries, and vice prime ministers, and in the end the verkhovna rada is big enough for... the legislative body, the highest legislative body , what are these, what changes are we talking about, i would like to understand your opinion, whether in the conditions of this concentration of power is unlimited, because monopower, it implies monoresponsibility, and here, in principle , it is obviously necessary to say, what if power is in the hands of five or six people, so what are you talking about? reboot say and th

minister of culture is no longer there, how many 7 months have there been since the resignation of oleksandr tkachenkonot remember their names, because even if you kill me, i, for example, will not name the minister of ecology. i do not know who the minister of ecology is, nor the name of the minister of social policy, except that i visually remember what she looks like, but this is a unique experience in general, including political experts and political journalists, that they , well, simply, really, probably five or six managers remember everything and that's all, although the power in ukraine is quite large, that is, it is also state committees, ministries, and the vice-premier years, and in the end the verkhovna rada is a sufficiently large legislative body, the highest legislative body. what kind of changes are we talking about, i would like to understand your opinion, whether in the conditions of this concentration of power is unlimited, because monopower, it implies monoresponsibility, and here, in principle , it is obviously necessary to say that if the power in in the hands of five or six peo

combination, it was not for nothing that this proposal was made, but it was not for nothing that oleksandr tkachenkoked it up, well, that is, but... i am all these combinations, i do not buy them, nor in live broadcast, no, i picked her up because she seemed right to me, but in fact it was wrong, and when my colleagues leaned and ka and began to say that from the committee, yes, and there all the people are very difficult and very independent , and it is simply impossible to put pressure on them, that's all. i repeat, i repeat many times, these are very decent people with bad characters in the best sense of the word with reputations, they said, no, this is wrong, because we are undermining the trust in the award, which is already very weak in the society, and here is my question , or is it on yours opinion, in fact, this is the fate of these state awards, which will always be, will always be... arguments of people who suspect, there will always be these suspicions, or if you had not made this mistake, and the award would have remained reputationally intact beyond suspicion and it would have function