therefore , i do not know how to please everyone , because everyone is not happy . lawyer oleksandr zolotukhin, the city authorities can use these funds only for their intended purpose, in this case, to help the victims and to eliminate the consequences of rocket fire, otherwise spending money from benefactors is prohibited but there is one clear decision in the legislation, because such assistance to the victims does not have to do with it, accordingly , such a very strong expansion is going on. many hypotheses can be put forward . 45 apartments were destroyed, a total of 27 mostly affected residents moved to relatives or acquaintances, others use social housing, but they all say that they are waiting to return home , they don't even know which part they belong to will the first entrance be dismantled, that is, one side of the house and the stairs will remain, what should they dismantle on the other side? i don't know at all whether the first entrance will be dismantled at all, we don't know anything about it. the decision of the commission is like them they always say nothing, and there is n

with everything, but as it should be, and as you wish, no one does not know this, as lawyer oleksandr zolotukhintheir intended purpose, in this case for assistance...

as lawyer oleksandr zolotukhin explains, the city authorities can use these funds only for their intended purpose , in this case to help the victims and to eliminate the consequences of rocket fire, otherwise, spending the money of benefactors is prohibited by law, but there is one, but, a clear definition in the legislation , after all , there is no help for the victims because of this accordingly, there is such a very strong expansion, it is possible to put a lot of hypotheses, what is it that can be understood by this concept and what can be included there. the first entrance of the building that was hit by a rocket, which had 45 apartments , was destroyed on january 27. most of the affected residents have moved in with relatives or acquaintances, others are using social housing, but they all say that they are waiting to return home. they don't even know which part they will dismantle, or the first entrance, that is... the beam, one side of the house and the stairs remain, what they have there on the other side to dismantle, i don't know at all whether the first entrance will be demone

everyone , because everyone is not satisfied with everything. does not know this, as lawyer oleksandr zolotukhinhe city authorities can use these funds only for their intended purpose, in this case, to help the victims and for liquidation

dissatisfied with everything, and as you need and as you want, no one knows this, as lawyer oleksandr zolotukhinlains, the city authorities can use these funds only for their intended purpose, in this case to help the victims and to eliminate the consequences of rocket fire, otherwise spending the money of benefactors prohibited by law, but there is one, but, the definition is clear in the legislation, that there is no such assistance to the victims, from this, accordingly, such a very strong expansion follows, many hypotheses can be put forward, what is it, what can be understood by this concept and what can be included there, the first the entrance of the building, which was hit by a rocket and had 45 apartments, was destroyed on january 27, most of the affected residents moved to relatives or acquaintances. others use social housing, but they all say that they are waiting to return home, they don't even know what part they will be in to dismantle, or the first entrance, i.e. the beam, one side of the house and the stairs remain, what they have to dismantle there on the other side , i do not k

nobody knows, as lawyer oleksandr zolotukhin explains. these funds are only earmarked, in this case for helping the victims and for liquidating the consequences of rocket fire; otherwise , spending the money of benefactors is prohibited by law. but there is one clear definition in the legislation, because what is aid there are no victims and accordingly there is such a very strong expansion . many hypotheses can be put forward. what is this concept that can be understood and what can be done there ? they use social housing, but they all say that they are waiting to return home , they don't even know which part they will dismantle, and the first entrance, that is , one side of the house and the stairs remain they have to dismantle it there on the other side. i don't know at all whether the first entrance will be dismantled at all. we don't know anything at all. it's the decision of the commission, as they always say . there's nothing else. they don't have any clarity. and now mrs. olga shows her parents' apartment on the eighth floor, the door to which is open, but it is impossible to ge

with everyone, and no one knows how to do it, as it is necessary, and as you want, as lawyer oleksandr zolotukhinins, the city authorities can use these funds only for their intended purpose, in this case, to help the victims and liquidation of the consequences of rocket fire, otherwise, spending games... benefactors is prohibited by law, but there is one thing, but, the definition is clear in the legislation, that there is no such help to the victims, from this , accordingly, such a very strong expansion follows, many hypotheses can be put forward, what is it, how can this concept be understood and what can be included there, the first entrance of the building that was hit by the rocket had 45 apartments, 27 were destroyed, most of the affected residents moved to relatives or acquaintances. others use social housing, but they all say that they are waiting to return home. they they don’t even know which part they will dismantle, or the first entrance , that is, the beam, one side, the building and the stairs remain, that they have to dismantle there on the other side, i don’t know at all, whether

everyone, because everyone is not satisfied with everything. does not know this, as the lawyer oleksandr zolotukhinexplains, the city authorities can use these funds only for their intended purpose, in this case, to help the victims and to eliminate the consequences of rocket fire, otherwise spending the money of benefactors is prohibited by law. but there is one clear definition in the legislation, because such assistance would not suffer from this, accordingly , such a very strong expansion is going on, many hypotheses can be put forward, what is it, what can be understood about this concept and what can be included there the first entrance the building that was hit by the rocket had 45 apartments destroyed, 27 of them were destroyed, the suffering residents moved to relatives or acquaintances , others use social housing, but they all say that they are waiting for their return home they don't even know how often to dismantle the first entrance, that is, the beam is on one side of the house and they went down to say that they have to dismantle it from the other side. i don't know at all whether th

unhappy with everyone, and no one knows how to do it and how you want it, as explained by lawyer oleksandr zolotukhin, city government may use these funds only for their intended purpose. in this case, for help. to the victims and to liquidate the consequences of rocket fire , otherwise, spending the money of benefactors is prohibited by law, but there is one thing, but a clear definition in the legislation that there is no such aid to the victims, from this accordingly, there is such a very strong expansion, many hypotheses can be put forward, what is this, what can be understood by this concept and what can be included there, the first entrance of the building that was hit by the rocket had 45 apartments, 27 were destroyed, mostly the affected residents moved to relatives or acquaintances, others use social housing, but they all say that they are waiting to return home, they do not even know which part they will dismantle, or the first entrance, that is, only one side of the house and the stairs remain, that they are there from the second the parties shall dismantle, i don't know at all whether the

as the lawyer oleksandr explains zolotukhin, the city government can use these funds only for their intended purpose. in this case, to help the victims and to eliminate the consequences of rocket fire, otherwise the spending of benefactors' money is prohibited by law, but there is one , but a clear definition in the legislation, that there is no such help to the victims, from this, accordingly, there is such a strong expansion, many hypotheses can be put forward , what can be understood by this concept and what can be included there. the first entrance of the house that was hit by the rocket totaled 45 apartments, 27 were destroyed . most of the affected residents have moved in with relatives or friends, others use social housing, but they all say that they are waiting to return home. they don't even know which part they will dismantle, or the first entrance, i.e. the beam, one side of the building and the stairs remain, what they have to dismantle there on the other side, i don't know at all whether the first entrance will be demonetized, at all we do not know anything, this is the decision