well, i just wanted to clarify it, the adviser to the head of the president's office, oleksiy arestovichd that the destruction of the crimean bridge can have a propaganda effect however, in practice it is not so easy to do, he compared it to the attacks on the city of antonivsk in the kherson region, and that it was not the first time that it was managed to disable it. well, first of all, i can say that on the antoniv bridge, for example, we have more information, we know that it was the times systems. that is, we can talk about it, as it relates to er, here, here, here, these explosions or cotton in the crimea. we cannot for sure to say about what this weapon could have been, we can state that it was powerful because the detonation was quite powerful, so powerful, which indicates that either the planted explosives were correct or the blows were precisely aimed at the target and themselves the ammunition that we used or the rockets, they also had an extremely powerful force, i will say that the antonov bridge is one example, but this does not mean that the ukrainian forces can act on the