in fact, the historical rubric from olesya nitsevich continues crimea has always been a vikram, it wasas preceded by 300 years of tatar ottoman rule, and only in the spring of 1783, the territory was forcibly annexed to the russia well, it lasted for 134 years already with the beginning of the 1917 revolution crimea was under the control of the soviet government returning crimea russia corrects the mistakes of the soviet union a widespread myth that after the collapse the president of the soviet union, boris yeltsin, seems to have made a mistake by deciding to preserve the status of crimea as a ukrainian territory. well, in fact, in 1990 , that is, before the declaration of ukraine's independence, leonid kravchuk and boris yeltsin signed an agreement that showed respect for already

olesya nitsevich refuted the most common russian myths about the ukrainian language.ainian language experienced a lot of oppression and changes during four centuries, it was banned and destroyed. and those who spoke it or wrote, the 30s were punished - this is the period when people were sentenced to hard labor only for their desire to speak and create in their native language, in history this event was called shot the revival, then, the four most widespread myths about the ukrainian language and their questioning ukrainian and russian are the most closely related languages, active russification began in the 30s, then a special commission was even created to select russian equivalents for ukrainian words. well, the list of repressed words, for example, included either probably or probably you turned into exploitation well , the cup became just a mug in this way, the idea of ​​unity and one people was instilled in ukrainians, but in fact, lexically, it is the closest to ours languages ​​are belarusian, followed by polish, then slovak . and only in place of russian, the

previously seen in the occupied crimea about the grain front my colleagues olesya nitsevich and nazar long had a long conversation with the ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of ukraine in lebanon igor ostash, the ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of ukraine joins our broadcast good evening we are from ukraine yes, we are all from ukraine and our ukrainian grain is the same, but you always know that we have the opportunity not to sell, but to win back and this is not literally, not figuratively , literally, i am talking about the situation of the vessel, which means the syrian one, which in the end, according to the decision of the court in the lebanese were still released. how do you comment on this story, because earlier i will remind you that the proposals of the ukrainian side were such that, well , it was proposed to buy this grain there at some moderate prices, but still the ship left lebanon. why did this happen? well, you know , i will start from the first time since it was a real grain front it was very difficult we lived a whole week in a state of war wi

famous fighter for ukrainian independence in the historical section in fact, we look at our olesya nitsevichbandera hate the russian language, russians and even ukrainians from the southeast, in fact , they were against the crimes of the soviet union in the 39th, western ukraine treated the soviet army normally. for two years, they managed to turn loyalty into mad hatred, those bachinsts were led by party cadres who were russian or russian-speaking. that is why in western ukraine the russian language can still be associated with evil he upa and stepan bandera himself are agents of the special services of the nazis. in fact, these organizations began their activities even before the beginning of the second world war, so there was cooperation between ukrainian nationalists and german intelligence, but the nationalists acted with the aim of creating an independent ukrainian state, and on june 30, 1941, the act of restoration was proclaimed the ukrainian state, which provoked the conflict with hitler's germany, then stepan bandera was persecuted. well, then he ended up in a concentration camp. t

historical column, in fact, from olesya nitsevich, crimea is always serious. in fact, crimea never existed, and the end of the russian territory in general. the annexation of the crimean khanate was preceded by 300 years of tatar ottoman rule, and only in the spring of 1783 did the territory forcibly join russia. and so it lasted for 134 years already with the beginning of the 1917 revolution crimea was under the control of the soviet government returning crimea russia is correcting the mistakes of the soviet union a common myth that after the collapse of the soviet union, president boris yeltsin made a mistake by deciding to preserve the status of crimea as a ukrainian territory. well, in fact, in 1990, that is, before the declaration of ukraine's independence, leonid kravchuk and boris yeltsin signed an agreement certifying respect for the already existing borders, thereby confirming crimea as part of of ukraine, and a key indicator in this is also the referendum on december 1, 1991, when more than half of crimeans said yes to an independent ukraine with the