olmstead and vaux bowed to their wishes, kept the menagerie in the park.y the way, the central park zoo is the first place americans saw a chimpanzee, so it was a big deal. here they are about the turn of the 20th century at the zoo. and what about the music pavilion? the original one at the northern end of the mall. this is the mall. bethesda terrace is to the right. the pergola is in back of the photographer. the original central park music pavilion, gorgeous piece of ironwork. very metallic, could not be built of stone, could not be built of any other material. looks very art nouveau but it is only 30 years before art nouveau 1862, comes in. very pre-art deco. here it is on the lower right, a painting from 1910 showing you the brilliant coloration of it. had to be painted, so they painted in brilliant colors, very much influenced by muslim architecture. beautiful photograph from the 1860's of the music pavilion in the background. and here it is, you hardly see it. once the working classes were living around central park, look how many people poured in o

we didn't leave olmstead behind. there is still a property interest that is implicated by the fourth amendment, but cats supplemented that. you have a reasonable expectation of privacy test and this property law test for whether aoccurred. whether a gps device was physically placed on the car. maybe in our new world it is time to shift away from the reasonable expectation of privacy test. because we have persist end surveillance in public places. nobody technically could even argue nobody ever has a reasonable expectation of privacy anywhere. is that the future for the fourth amendment when you're spying on everybody all of the or not the dissents, the concurrenc concurrences, started to go that direction and started to look at the persistence of the surveillance and how much information is gathered and over how much time, and we're starting to see another doctrinal shift in that direction. so it's possible that we'll have to re-evaluate this under another test, but the great thing about our paper is we were able to

vaux, you, olmstead and for that. >> you're watching american history tv, 48 hours of every weekend on c-span 3. follow us on twitter to keep up with the latest history news. each week, "american artifacts" visits museums and historic places. next, a visit to the u.s. army's archives in carlisle, pennsylvania, to learn about their soldier experience gallery, which traces army history from the 1898 spanish american war to the present. >> welcome to the u.s. army heritage and education center in carlisle, pennsylvania. my name is carl warren. i'm going to show you around today. this is the part of the facility more like a museum rather than an artifact archives or storage facility. it's our way to show the american public the sort of materials we have here, so you can understand army history, whether you're a soldier and a veteran or someone who has never had family or been in the army themselves. we start the timeline for this exhibit with the spanish-american war because that's when our collections have the very first recorded audio oral histories of soldiers who actually experienced t

olmstead was a former seattle police officer who was the of capone of the west. was the largest bootlegger of the west. and at one point he was believed to be the largest employer in the puget sound region in the 1920's. he ran a massive building operation bringing down barrels a whiskey from canada. halsted was known to be a bootlegger. the police install the wiretap outside this house of fall in line. they found all sorts of evidence from the wiretap transcripts that he was, in fact, a massive bootlegger. was convicted on the basis of those recordings of transcripts and sentenced to a long prison term. he appealed to the supreme court arguing that the police should have that a warrant before they monitored his communications. the supreme court rejected the arguments engaging in the same kind of analysis that kevin and may be engaging here. they looked to notions of trespass. the fourth amendment's, peoples, persons, houses, facts, not in that order, but tangible things. then in electronic communication none of those things when it was merely electrons flying on