es campeona mundial de la categorÍa sÚper mosca de la omb femenino y lleÓo por pura casualidad. >> yoeptar el reto. >> peinada y toda arreglada y vi que estaban todos entrenando y cuando empecÉ hacer los ejercicios y empecÉ a transpirar. >> carolina estaba descubriendo un mundo diferente ajeno a su tipo de vida en donde impera los golpes de puÑos y los hombres son mayorÍa, pero nada de esto pareciÓ intimidarla, por el contrario le dio la fuerza necesaria para andar en el difÍcil camino del boxeo. >> carolina lo que tiene es coraje y un espÍritu y un corazÓn que muy poco boxeadores lo tienen. >> fue entonces cuando llegÓ la oportunidad que tanto deseaba, buscar una estrategia adecuada para pelear con la corona del mundo. >> >> el plan de pelea era atacar que era peligrosa y si retrocedÍa no tenia armas en retroceso. >> tiene varios golpes pero es muy duro el izquierdo. >> temo demasiado duro, a la par de un hombre. >> hoy dÍa carolina ha cumplido su sueÑo llegando a la cima de su carrera profesional, pero a pesar de la gloria alcanzado algo parece inquietar a esta exitosa mujer. >> la

xies-7Ñww6akepÑá de la omb femino y ñ=uuÑpçokskrooedt!a descubriendo un mundo diferente ajeno a su tipo de vida en z@ mq donde çw3tvve#fd&- impera los golp de !v x puÑos y losombres son mayorÍa, z@ pero nada mq de esto pareciÓtimidarla, por el contrario le dio ñ=uuÑpçokskrooedt!xies-7Ñww6akepÑ la fuza necesaria para andar en el difÍcil z@ camino del boxeo. >> carolina lo que tiene es çw3tvve# coraje yn espÍritu y !v xoñ"el+dbe!pdkyo2oé un corazÓn que muy poco z@ mq boxeadore lo tienen. >> fue entonces cuando llegÓ la oportunidad que tanto deseaba, buscar una estrategia adecuada para pelear con ñ=uuÑpçokskro corona del mundo. >> >> el plan de pelea era z@ mq atacar que era peligrosa y çw3t si retrocedÍa no tenÍa armas en retroceso. >>iene varios golpes pero es muy duro el çw3tvve#fd&-izquierdo. >> temo demasiado duro a la par de un hombre. >> z@ mq hoy dÍafi carolina ha ;7 cumplido su sueÑo lleganda la cima de su carrera profesional, pero a pesar de la çw3tvve#fd&- gloria alcanzado algo parece inquietar z@ mq a esta exosa mujer. fg/ >>

. >> but isn't there at the end of the bill, a directed scoring provision telling omb and cbo that they have account savings in the bill but not account spending. >> well, the directed scoring is for a ten-year overview of the bill. that's what cbo also -- >> what's your take on that, mr. levin? >> frankly, i don't know what to make of it. it's a little hard to know what to make of a number of these provisions in the bill which we saw on friday and we have are spent a lot of time trying to understand the ramifications of. >> but is there a directed measure to omb and cbo? >> apparently. >> it is? >> apparently. >> yes. all right, that's the point i wish to make. it's strange and it's at the end of the provision. i'd also ask you, chairman camp, i believe that there are a significant number of immigrant families who already pay taxes and the measure as offered with the tax identification number instead of a social security number, do you believe that that would make those people ineligible for a tax credit? >> -- child tax credit. this is the same reform that we've applied to the earned

there something like four books on omb for books on gao and i thought it sort of a travesty. some level that there was not a book on cbo. it became easier actually to convince publishers who are important to book enterprises, that such a thing was perhaps an important thing to do. once cbo was so heavily involved in the obama health care reform because it was a whole sort of beginning part of the pitch, which is why should anybody care, that i really didn't have to make at that point. >> i think i read in your book, and hopefully i'm going it correctly, that congressional budget office is where legislation goes to die. >> that with senator wyden said that from oregon, said actually that the history of health care reform is that bills go to the congressional budget office to die. now, this irony here is that actually there was a health care reform after that point that was enacted, but what he had in mind i think mostly was the clinton health care reform of 1994 where it certainly became part of the lower that it was the cbo cost estimate and report on that particular legislat

>> the omb has the power to look at systems and recommend or not recommend their approval based upon the budgetary impact. initially, that budgetary impact has just been the cost of buildings and operating equipment. it does not take into account explicitly the value of the spectrum that may be used in meeting the mission of that equipment. this would basically be design engineers sitting down and doing a design to meet certain specifications. they may not be as conscious as they would be of the value of this resource, as perhaps they should be. perhaps the idea is for them to do some calculations to show what the valium -- value is of the spectrum they're going to use. and then maybe make some trade- offs. is it worth this extra bit of performance if it is going to cost an awful lot in terms of the amount of spectrum consumed, spectrum that could be used in some other high-value application as well? >> is this feasible? is that something that could happen where agencies are essentially charged for their spectrum used? >> i believe so. the united kingdom has had some experience with

as you suggest, the omb of course does have the power to look at systems and recommend or not recommend their approval based upon the budgetary impact. traditionally that vegetarian pact though has just been the cost of the building and operating the equipment and has not taken into account is blessedly the value of the spectrum that may be used in providing, meeting the mission of that equipment. basically design engineer sitting down and doing a design. is focused on making it perform to meet certain specifications and they not be as conscious as they should be of the value of this resource, the value of the spectrum that is perhaps they should be so the idea is for them to do some calculations to show what the value of the spectrum they are going to use and then to make some trade-offs. in other words is it really worth this extra little bit of performance if it's going to cost an awful lot in terms of the amount of spectrum consumed, spectrum that could be used in some other high-value application as well. >> host: professor hatfield is that feasible? is that something that could ha

person in that position he was surprisingly popular among the faculty, and he -- kennedy had guns in the omb is kennedy was on the harvard board of overseers. a harvard graduate, and so he was a senator for massachusetts. he saw and operate with the overseer and he was impressed. so that is lori came from. he was not -- he had previously written memoirs of a very important figure in the nation's security policy and lower to end before that he had not done major work inside the government before, but people's sons of some of that if you could manage ordinary independence harvard professors he did probably manage government to a westerner to be the case. >> host: to president johnson of a national security adviser? >> guest: he had two. the first one he had was george bundy. he inherited sunday, monday served him until march of 1966, so almost as long as he served in the. initially johnson taught first of all, was desperate to it keep the kennedy people. he needed them. he did not have the background of the staff people who have that sort of stuff to the refugees, but at the same time he resen

omb has a strong condition that when the budget is on the table being considered, it is decision of. this diminishes the ability to engage in the collaboration. sometimes you need to do it in this town. after the budget comes out, then we go to the hills. we have to find some way to be key members of congress in to define what areas are promising. and to use omb for this. >> i think your comments about the review and where it might budget committee is the best equipped to draw a membership from across a whole range of committees. this is a committee that does not work on the budget. it includes entitlement and discretionary. my frustration is that whether it is the gao's recent report for the inspector general's report on all sorts of performance or underperformance in programs, there is nothing that requires that any of that gets picked up. you would think whether it is the budget committee or offering committee that any time succumbs out comment it would be to -- any time that comes out, it would lead to leave you. >> that is why all of our papers get together. i do not think there

martha's vineyard and i am sure there is no preparation on the hill and i suspect there were people at the omb and the council of economic advisers who said, what? what jobs plan are we laying out isn't president has a tendency on vacation not to be on top of it as much as he should. the underwear bomber, we had several days before we heard from the president on that. >> karl, thank you. >> thank, greta. >> straight ahead, a warning, health officials say that health care is in critical condition. very disturbing news. and senator grassley says that the justice department is being deceitful. that's a polite way of saying, lying. he's here to tell all. the crowd goes wild, a football celebration turns wild as fans rush the field. it's all caught on camra. stick around to see this video. new regenerist wrinkle revolution... relaxes the look of wrinkles instantly, and the look of deep wrinkles in 14 days. ready, set, smooth... regenerist. from olay. we get double miles on every purchase. so we earned a holiday trip to the big apple twice as fast! nner! [ garth ] we get double miles every time we u

fha were to use up the amounts that are in the capital reserve account, they would consultation with omb, draw on permanent and definite authority to make up whatever difference would be required to replenish that that's needed for the financing account through the capital reserve account, so there is this permanent definite authority providing whatever appropriated dollars might be needed in order to make the capital reserve account whole. >> so there's no limits? >> no. >> thank you. the chair notes some members may have additional questions for the panel they wish to submit in writing, without objection. the hearing record is open for 30 days for members to enter in questions and place responses into the recordment again, thank you for your patience, and thank you for being here, and you've been very helpful, i think, in bringing your testimony to us, and we thank you so much, and with that, this hearing is adjourned. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] >> i look at why a country does well or

and i've spoken to jack lew and to dana hyde at omb, and they are willing to open up to a discussion that would look into how we might better pursue this. you know, should it be its own organized crime strike force model from the kennedy era? should it be akin to ocedef which has been quite successful against domestic narcotics trafficking? should it be a new dea or atf or fbi? should it be that big when you consider the scope of the threat and the complexity of making the cases? the forensics of making the case, the international angle to virtually all of them, the complexity of the statutes. i mean, you stack it all up, and it's just -- each one of these cases is an almost majestic accomplishment to pull it together. and if we're going to do a lot of them, which we need to do, we've got to, i think, throw more money at the problem. and how we best do that, i think s a discussion that we need to have, and i would like to ask you if you'd be prepared to join in that discussion, um, and let me know who the right person to participate in that discussion for the fbi would be. kind of br

confidence in george shultz and georgia took to the labour portfolio with him went to went over to omb. i think the president was inclined to allow the labor department to run as it wished. he trusted george. i do not think he had that kind of confidence in other domestic cabinet secretaries. certainly not the state department. >> michael, you're in the white house at what point. what is your take on the role of the white house and in those cabinetthe infantcy of a structure? >> when i was at hud, he set up a super cabinet officers. the secretary of hud was in charge of one group of cabinet agencies. something like community and urban development. the old executive office building, he was back and forth between the two. he had a person working for him who had handled these broader responsibilities. this lasted less than a year. the structure, to have one officer oversee other officers was doomed to failure. of course watergate was going on, too. i do not think that structure was viable. >> was i right about george shultz? no other domestic officer -- nobody else i know. >> i think you

in my time as omb director, i became more convinced it was necessary for washington have been due toave the discipline of a balanced budget, just as the vast majority of our states. until the balanced budget can be enacted, my view is that congress has to prove its mettle as a responsible steward of taxpayer dollars, including attacking waste, duplication, and obsolete spending on the discretionary budget, to earn the trust of the american people in our to reform those important entitlement programs we talked about. no federal spending should go and examine. clearly, washington is not working. the nation's mounting debt and deficits are holding back on job creation, keeping millions of americans out of work. the economy needs on to brewers to come off the sidelines, to hire and invest. the way to do that is through pro-growth policies, including deficit neutral tax reform that brings hundreds of billions back to the shores, and budget reform that forces washington to strengthen the entitlement programs. while final resolution elude us, the super committee's work can benefit the work

we would task omb with coming up with a study for consolidating most job training programs under one agency and making sure that they're truly effective, that the training really is leading to jobs for individuals enrolled in these programs. we would also provide an innovative cluster development program so that states and regions can identify those trends and help to develop those strengths. our bipartisan plan is fully paid for with the 2% surtax on those who earn a million dollars or more a year, but -- and this is critical -- with a carveout to protect small business owner operators such as those who file subchapter s corporations and pay their taxes on individual income tax returns. we wanted to make sure that we were not imposing a surtax on the job creators in this country. we would also, to pay for our plan, finally repeal the unneeded tax subsidies for the five largest oil companies which would generate additional revenue. i'd be happy to discuss our plan in further detail, but first, i'd like to introduce my partner in this endeavor,hzç >> at the end of the day, that's the

as chairman of the house budget committee, amd omb director, i had the opportunity to work on budget issues regarding military assistance to israel. as a member of president clinton + cabinet, as chief of staff, i had the opportunity to be present at that historic moment when the south lawn, when yasser arafat and yitzhak rabin shook hands in the effort to advance the peace process. tragically, after rabin's death, i had the opportunity as president clinton's pete chief of staff to fly with them so he could pay tribute to the memory and to the dedication to peace of rabin. in the years since, as director of the cia and now as secretary of defense, i have worked closely with a number of israeli leaders, the prime minister and many intelligence and military leaders. one of whom i understand is here this morning, mayor degant, who often work with that mossad and i understand is participating in this forum. yehud barak is a friend i have known for years and we have had the opportunity to meet in number of times in our capacities and discuss our shared efforts to strengthen israeli securi

a consumer disclosure involved, the paperwork reduction act requires utc to review and clearance of omb. you must consider the potential benefits and cost to consumers and financial consumers provided, banking regulars and other federal agencies regarding the rules. this is all before proposing the rule. this is significant economic impact. you must follow the small business regulatory enforcement fairness act. you must under the ragged reflects ability act prepare an initial regulatory flexibly announces. and proposing the role the way i read the law is you must give public notice proposed rules, offer the public opportunity, under administrative procedures act, consult with your corporate banking agencies, pursuant to the regulatory flexibly act, conducted final flexibly announces. after the rule has been finalized, again, this is all, this doesn't sound unaccountable to me, but after the rule has been finalized and if any member of the console object to regulation they can petition, if a member agency objects can petition the fsoc to get it removed. they can stay or set aside the reg

i think there's some evidence in the numbers that have already gone over to omb. >> you know, i actuallyt of iraq. i would love to praise the president for being responsible on entitlement programs. i don't think i'm going to have that opportunity. so let's have an over, under bet here on the president's budget. because carl brings up a good point. the republicans have botched the timing of this, that the democrats haven't had a budget in over 900 days. the president put his budget on the floor last year, got zero votes. what is the over, under on the president's budget in february? because he's got to put one out there. >> on the dates or the votes? >> on the number of votes he gets, maybe, five, six out of 100? >> nine. >> it is such a cowardly institution. >> yeah. if carl is correct and the president puts forward a budget that proposes major entitlement cuts. >> oh, that'll be historic. >> that'll lower my number to three. >> i'm telling you, it's one of the great ironies here in this budget battle. the bigger -- and steve, i read articles from people who had been really digging in a

he has been director of omb and if he is free from some of the political constraints, if there is a political consensus behind him and he's given ten years and he hasn't done politicians looking over his shoulder as we had recently in the battle that we had in the last congress with senator kyl, insanity, absolute insanity. these are things that we can reduce down. we are spending almost as much as the rest of the world combined, and we can't do it and we don't need to do it. host: let's get one more call in. per are i is a democrat from st. louis, missouri. good morning. >> good morning. thanks for taking my call. i'm 53 years old and all my life, i thought social security wouldn't be there by the time i get to the age to use it. i look at it as something paid every month, never been missed. the reason why i wasn't sure it would be there but the democrats always fought as the primary need for people when they got old it would be there. now we have president obama throw social security on the table and they're going to raise the age once again. it's a lie we're living longer. we're living abo

that point in time that the effective date of the rule be tied to the time period of transmission to omb, and there was the recommendation that commissioner and i are referring to. >> oh, okay, so both the directer of nuclear reactions agreed with the statement you just -- >> this was the directer of the office of nuclear new recreated aactors. >> new reactors, that's correct. does this administrative delay have any safety implications 1234 >> no, sir, it does not. >> if i understand you correctly -- no, i'll go ahead and yield my last couple minutes to senator vitter, because he wanted the remainder of his -- >> i appreciate that very much. picking up on the information flow issue, mr. chairman, does the whole commission not vote on a budget or budget issues? >> yes, at a high level, yes, it does. >> okay, i don't understand the previous comment that budget information, detailed budget information, should not be provided upon request. >> they are based on the statutory history. the chairman is solely responsible for preparation of the budget, so the -- >> it is a voting matter, wouldn't

with respect to f y 13, we are now in that process with omb and those budget numbers will come out in the normal course of business and you will see them shortly but we are all under the same pressure and that is in an era of constraint, fiscal resources making sure we are spending dollars wisely and well and that goes back to the program today which is to say that in the area of homeland security, the more we can smooth business processes the more we can work globally, the more we can harmonize requirements, the more we can reduce burdens on travel and commerce but at the same time enhance our security that is a net positive in the united states. it is a new way to engage with countries around the world and i am hopeful and anticipate that the budget will support those efforts. >> quick follow-up. how much was sequestration should it happen? >> we're not talking about sequestration. >> there you go. there it is. thank you very much. [applause] [inaudible conversations] mayor cory bookers summit trip to new hampshire to campaign for president obama. today he spoke of the new hampshire

the details how much money the industries give to the members of congress, and the members, a former omb portman wrote up in here by receiving? like $59,000 from ge over the 2010 elections, and i guess the main point here to find from you is how can we, with the probably we're in economically, how is this ever going to stop when the defense department who needs the weapons says no and the congress says yes? >> guest: i mean every year there was another -- i don't know 10 or 12 billion that the congress added to our legislation. we didn't want. we argued, please, don't put that in there. it's for things that had nothing to do with the defense budget. now, the implication of the question is, sure, we have serious economic problems in the country, but there's no way to balance the budget off the defense department. c-span: my implication is how do we start this throughout government? >> guest: exactly. it's broad. the entitlements is basically where the money goes, the largest frangs. we spend today a relatively small percentage of gdp on defense compared to, for example, back in the eisenh

with respect to f y 13, we are now in that process with omb and those budget numbers will come out in the normal course of business and you will see them shortly but we are all under the same pressure and that is in an era of constraint, fiscal resources making sure we are spending dollars wisely and well and that goes back to the program today which is to say that in the area of homeland security, the more we can smooth business processes the more we can work globally, the more we can harmonize requirements, the more we can reduce burdens on travel and commerce but at the same time enhance our security that is a net positive in the united states. it is a new way to engage with countries around the world and i am hopeful and anticipate that the budget will support those efforts. >> quick follow-up. how much was sequestration should it happen? >> we're not talking about sequestration. >> there you go. there it is. thank you very much. [applause] [inaudible conversations] >> a dollar now for your labor. have no health care. the most expensive elements making the cost. no environmental c

additional data that were submitted to the docket, the draft final rule is currently under review at the omb. so, again, i just want to re-enforce that i speak for all of the fmcsa employees across the country to say we are passionately to our congressionally mandated mission to reduce the crashes of trucks and buses. we work every day 24/7 to fulfill this mission, fulfill the public's expectation for safety and safe travel. our citizens deserve no less. so with that, mr. chairman, i'll be pleased to answer any questions you may have. >> and i'll be as brief as well. you said there were 4,000 fatalities last year. last year you had records because of truck accidents, 4,000 -- >> for 2010, our estimates -- we continue -- we collect crash data directly from our state and law enforcement partners through our traffic motor advisory program or through our assistance program and through that data preliminarily we're showing an uptick in 2010. crash rates still remain at historic lows which is a tremendous outcome. >> okay. >> not even close to being low enough but that's what we're -- >> so crash

as chairman of the house budget committee, amd omb director, i had the opportunity to work on budget issues regarding military assistance to israel. as a member of president clinton + cabinet, as chief of staff, i had the opportunity to be present at that historic moment when the south lawn, when yasser arafat and yitzhak rabin shook hands in the effort to advance the peace process. death,lly, after rabin's i had the opportunity as president clinton's pete chief of staff to fly with them so he could pay tribute to the memory and to the dedication to peace of rabin. in the years since, as director of the cia and now as secretary of defense, i have worked closely with a number of israeli leaders, the prime minister and many intelligence and military leaders. one of whom i understand is here this morning, mayor degant, who often work with that mossad and i understand is participating in this forum. yehud barak is a friend i have known for years and we have had the opportunity to meet in number of times in our capacities and discuss our shared efforts to strengthen israeli security. i wa

office and budget.t the effective date of this rule would be timed to the check date of transmission to omb. >> both the director of the nuclear agreed? >> new reactors, correct. >> did the delay had any safety indications? >> no, it did not. >> i will go ahead and yield my last couple minutes to senator vitter. >> i do not understand your previous comment that the budget information should not be provided on request. >> based on the statutory history, the chairman is solely responsible for preparation of the budget. >> this is eight voting matter. would it not be reasonable that any budget matter, when they are betting on the budget, for that commissioner be able to get it? >> is not true. last year plus budget, there was a misunderstanding on my part about how information was provided, when the budget was transmitted. this year with the budgets middle i provided all previous draft versions related to the budget. that was provided to each commission office when they receive the budget to begin their deliberations. >> what was the instance where they ask for information and it was not provi