and the public has to be informed how much we get from pittsburg 400 omega watts. how can from ity of that power and how is it going to contribute to the diminishing of the carbon foot print. today if you look all over san francisco, we have huge buildings using huge amounts of concrete that contribute more to the pollution and contamination of san francisco. today in san francisco we have over 4,000 toxic hot spots which the city and county of san francisco has not addressed. today in san francisco we have over 200,000 tons of methane gas spewing in the air which we need to address. your remarks are very general, and maybe you intend them to be general but somewhere there should be some data of how you are going to contribute to the progressive and betterment of san francisco. thank you very much. >> thank you. our next item, please? >>> so we had general public comment open now. any public wish to address any item related to the puc? please come forward. let me call the name. francisco decosta. >> again in this process, i attended a lafco meeting and was shocked

they have in the process of building 60 omega watts of power. they have a little bit of a model in san francisco which is conceived, this program was conceived as a build out program as well as a procurement service for customers. >> and care customers too, right? >> they don't have care customers. they have a large group of users. our target customers are very small users because they are in apartments. in marine they started with a lot of users and they were able to spread the cost over a lot of kilo watt hours. it's a different business model and they have different circumstances. >> thank you. >> just a follow up question on the process for the rate fairness board. what was the requirement in terms of the rate fairness board weighing in on our not to exceed rate. does it happen before or after. what is the guideline for that to happen? >> i will defer to our general manager, todd. >> good morning, todd, general manager. our rate provider has the opinion in that rate and they have done that in march and they have presented to this body and th

staff in terms of moving forward in terms of looking at this size for the program, we talk about 20 omega watts. i wonder how much is heche power. how far can we push that and i think that's something that i hope we can have a follow up with labor and another folks add the advocates to make sure that's something that can be done. from lafco's perspective, i appreciate the puc has a different process perhaps, i do think it's important for us to move forward because i don't think that setting a not to exceed rate precludes the discussion from happening. it's in the spirit that i would make the motion for lafco that we approve the not to exceed rate of 11.5. >> that is a separate vote from the puc commission. we want to make the statement for lafco body to reduce the rates. from a lafco member, can we get a second. >> we have a lafco resolution recommending the puc adopt the not to exceed rates. >> thank you. that's when commissioner campos has motion to an approved. >> the motion from campos and second by commissioner breed and third by lafco. can we take that motion without objection? and so we