that means on september 30 we were supposed to not only re-authorize chip, but to pass an omnibus bill to fund the government. republicans were not able to make the decisions necessary to do that. so we had one extension. another extension, another extension, this is the fourth. now for somebody who doesn't know what a c.r. is, that's our washington lingo, it's a continuing resolution. and what it says is that the funding for the country will be continued at the same rate as it was in the previous year. regardless of the fact that other challenges have emerged. so engaging in those failures to pass an omnibus bill and engage instead in these short -term continuing resolutions, this inadequacy does not give certainty to our military. general mattis has told us the military cannot go on these week -- every two weeks, every month c.r.'s. we need to know, we need to have an omnibus that recognizes the full complement of our needs and they are different from last year. it does not fund the fight against opioid addiction. we've talked about this. we authorized language. we put up some money,

committee can recommend to the full chamber and we can pass appropriations bill or cromnibus or an omnibus that will allow our agencies to have full-year appropriations. or i should say the remainder of this year's appropriations. and i certainly hope that will include f.y. 2019. that would certainly be the best. and that it will be balanced, balanced between the needs of the department of defense and the nondefense agencies. we have critical functions that require to have a full year of appropriations for, including our national defense, department of defense, our state department, the department of health and the work that's done in national institutes of health, food safety and the federal drug administration, the ability of the social security administration to deliver checks to our seniors and to take care of our health care needs. all that requires that we have the predictability of a budge. so i'm -- predictability of a budget. i'm pleased that during this debate, not pleased we had a shutdown, we had great discussions between democrats and republicans that we are committed to bring

that is but on this issue we have a much better chance to get to these budget issues resolved or omnibus rather than another continuing resolution. and then, mr. president, there is the issue of the dreamers that i've talked about numerous times on the floor of the united states senate. is urgent and it is urgent.d many dreamers lies have already been affected in their lives have been changed as a result of the present announcement last september putting a six-month time limit on one of the dreamers would be subject to deportation and that deadline occurred in early march but in the meantime those that are up for u renewal status there has been uncertainty as to whether they will be able to continue to reside in america and they will be able to continue to have a drivers license work and they feel like they have and do have a date on the back of their bodies saying that they expire on a particular date and that anxiety needs to end and never should have been started under president trump edict and we need to respond to that in an urgent way. i was pleased that we have a commitment from m

instead of adopting fully funded appropriations bills or an omnibus with an actual chance of passing this congress, we are in this unbreakable habit of passing continuing resolutions. the republican's most recent proposal does nothing for the funding for the 1,400 community health centers across the country or the 25 million americans they serve after they let funding run out in september. according to the national association of community health centers, if congress does not act soon, 28,000 sites could close, 50,000 staff could be laid off, and nine million americans could lose access to care. when did this program, which has always had bipartisan support in this body, become a partisan issue? these abdications are simply immoral. our republican colleagues say on't have the money to fund these programs, but somehow they were silent on that issue when they gave a handout to giant corporations that add more than $1.5 trillion to the deficit. while their donors rested peacefully over the holidays knowing their tax cuts were safe, republicans continued to torment 800,000 hardworking yo

guest: we have one week for the whole omnibus. all this stuff, no. i think they will have to extend it, maybe for another month or another couple weeks. 702 has been hanging over this, as well. guest: i think that is the biggest contentious point that people are talking about the least. there are people on both sides who have significant concerns about civil liberties. they do not like the idea that some american citizens get caught up in some of these wiretaps, and they want to do something about it, even if it means letting this entire program expire. people who are otherwise defense hawks looked at this and say, yeah, i don't like it. the other problem is if you try to attach it to a big piece of legislation, everyone also gets mad about that because they want nothing more than to debate this on its own merits. guest: to your early point, dan, the freedom caucus secured some cut of agreement to get a second -- separate vote on the surveillance law because it is so important to them to vote on that as a standalone and to have a separate debate on i

other leaders in the department of defense that the best way to keep them safe is for us to have an omnibus until the end of the fiscal year instead of once again cr after cr after cr. honoring our oath to keep the american people safe and recognizing that in the domestic budget there are security initiatives that relate to homeland security, state department, anti-terrorism activities in the justice department, we really need to have parity in our discussion of the budget. the additional money on the domestic side is what we are here to discuss this morning so people know what this discussion is about. we are supporting the defense initiatives if that is what the inksrtment of defense th is needed to keep america safe. but at the same time there are security functions on the domestic side and we want additional money to address some of the challenges that our country faces. one of those that is important in every district in america, where there is strong bipartisan support, everyone of our solutions on the path to an agreement, which we could make an hour. an hour. we want the president t

defense budget -- i mean, they actually wanted to leave the entire rest of the domestic budget to an omnibus later on and pass a full year defense appropriations budget, which is absolutely irresponsible. so we should leave all the other programs, making sure we take care of our domestic security to the side. what about funding education? health care? what about funding disease research? infrastructure? president trump has made a big show and a show is all it's been about investing in infrastructure. spare me the violins here. we need to make sure that we responsibly budget and that means the if had tire budget at the same time. we should do it on time, which it's been many years since we actually passed a budget on time before it end of the fiscal year and we need to do that by sitting on the table and working together. i've sat on the appropriations committee since my second term in congress. even that beginning we were known as the most bipartisan committee and unfortunately that has eroded significantly and we need get back to the days where approp reators sat down across the aisle and w

the appropriations committee can recommend to the chamber and we can pass appropriation bills or an omnibus that will allow our agencies to have full-year appropriations or i should say the remainder of this year's appropriations and i certainly hope that will include fy19. that would certainly be the past and then it will be balanced, balanced between the needs of the department of defense and the non-defense agencies. we have critical functions that require to have a full year of appropriations including our national defense, the department of defense, our statert departmt and the department of health and the work thats is done in food safety and the federal drug administration and the social security administration to deliver checks to our seniors and to take care of our health care needs. all of that requires that we have the flexibility of a budget. .. ons between democrats and republicans that we are committed to bringing out a budget by february 8 so that we can give that type of predictability to the people of this country. that was one of the principle frustrations that many of us

first of all i think there are a number of us who would like to keep the heat on for getting an omnibus completed which is basically using the new appropriations that we're trying to fund. and also the new authorizizations that provides the department of defense and other agencies with more up to date information. second of all f we do a short-term, it means for the democrats, they may very well have an interest in or at least they may very well see it as an opportunity to work with e president of the united states in termsf putting together a final border security arrangement, including addressing the daca issues. for me it means the visas we need in south dakota for our businesses during the tourist seasons that we have already run out of. so there are a number of items that could be addressed if we do a short-term. one of the reasons we talk about it is we have the state of the union coming up. and a lot of that would be great information to be able to provide in a real chance for the president to celebrate some victories. >> i guess my question is, is that sort of really short-term

that they will vote on the same defense spending bill that passed in july, stripping it out of the omnibus package and voting just on the bill. also, mark miles of the freedom caucus and a spokesman said they will also vote to lift the budget caps. we've talked about this already but do you envision a day when the senate will vote to raise caps? and what do you make on voting on a bill that has already passed the house. sen. inhoff: i would say this i , applaud the house for doing that. we've got to have the budget caps raised for the military. taking that action is going to in my opinion make it easier in the senate because we have a lot of people that -- i think all of your republicans, most all the republicans would support that. a few of the democrats that are a little bit more hawkish would. i think it's a great start. i applaud kevin for doing that and for putting us in that position because that's got to be done. a lot of things have to be done to fix the dilemma that we have. one is we have to have the appropriation bills and the other is we have to raise the caps and the other is

instead of adopting fully funded appropriations bills or an omnibus with an actual chance of passing this congress, we are in this unbreakable habit of passing continuing resolutions. the republican's most recent proposal does nothing for the funding for the 1,400 community health centers across the country or the 25 million americans they serve after they let funding run out in september. according to the national association of community health centers, if congress does not act soon, 28,000 sites could close, 50,000 staff could be laid off, and nine million americans could lose access to care. when did this program, which has always had bipartisan support in this body, become a partisan issue? these abdications are simply immoral. our republican colleagues say we don't have the money to fund these programs, but somehow they were silent on that issue when they gave a handout to giant corporations that add more than $1.5 trillion to the deficit. while their donors rested peacefully over the holidays knowing their tax cuts were safe, republicans continued to torment 800,000 hardworkin

. >> nos comunicaron vÍa telefÓnica que el ómnibus se habÍa precipitado en un accidente.atar con sus propios ojos el tragico final de sus seres queridos. el ministro de transporte dijo esta noche en su twitter que tanto el bus como el camiÓn eran conducidos con exceso de velocidad. segÚn informaciÓn proporcionada por los gps de los vehÍculos. un bus como este es el que se precipitÓ en la llamada curva del diablo. el rescate se volviÓ cada vez mÁs difÍcil conforme pasaba la noche. maÑana empezarÁ la terrible tarea del reconocimiento de los cuerpos. ilia: vamos a pasar a mÉxico. en los Últimos dos aÑos el nÚmero de mujeres presas por narcotrÁfico se ha duplicado en es paÍs.la mayoría de ellas recurre al transporte y empaquetamiento de droga por necesidad. el informe destaca que al momento de sentenciarlas, los jueces no consideran las enormes carencias que arrastran a estas mujeres al delito de la droga. >> te ofrezco que me acompaÑes y vayamos a mÉxico. vas a cargar un paquete que yo te voy a dar y te voy a dar dinero a cambio de eso. jessica: las cÁrceles de mÉxico estÁn

instead of adopting fully funded appropriations bills or an omnibus with an actual chance of passing this congress, we are in this unbreakable habit of passing continuing resolutions. the republican's most recent proposal does nothing for the funding for the 1,400 community health centers across the country or the 25 million americans they serve after they let funding run out in september. according to the national association of community health centers, if congress does not act soon, 28,000 sites could close, 50,000 staff could be laid off, and nine million americans could lose access to care. when did this program, which has always had bipartisan support in this body, become a partisan issue? these abdications are simply immoral. our republican colleagues say we don't have the money to fund these programs, but somehow they were silent on that issue when they gave a handout to giant corporations that add more than $1.5 trillion to the deficit. while their donors rested peacefully over the holidays knowing their tax cuts were safe, republicans continued to torment 800,000 hardworkin

varios pasajeros de un Ómnibus de la compaÑÍa de transporte interestatal, durante su viaje desde orlando a los pasajeros. activista dicen que se trata de la patrulla fronteriza. >> ellos siempre argumentan que todo el estado de la florida es una frontera, porque todo el estado quedas dentro de 100 millas del ocÉano, que es frontera. ellos entran donde ellos quedan y empiezan a plantar a la gente cuÁl es su ciudadanÍa. periodista: una mujer de el morena muestra sus documentos y legua sobria la gente agarrar el equipaje de la pasajera y ambos salen del autobÚs. no se sabe si esta persona fue detenida. >> lo que estÁn ocasionando con eso es que mucha gente pierda confianza a los policÍas, en vez de llamar a los policÍa para reportar algÚn crimen, en vez de que una vÍctima de abuso domÉstico reporta un abuso, estamos encontrando personas que no confÍan en los policías locales. >> la situaciÓn que estÁ viviendo el paÍs en este momento es de percusiÓn-- persecuciÓn. >> activistas pro inmigrantes advierten que las compaÑÍas de transportÉ privado no estÁn obligados a permitir el acceso de los ag

so we can get year and a half omnibus bill to do not just six months but full year and a half in a finalr the appropriations process. i think he did the right thing i think he's got us in a good position to negotiate. >> secretary mattis said with the military. you need that. continuing resolution one after the other since october, doesn't allow our military to do what this -- it needs to do. they need some planning that works for them. you got to get that. before i let you go, the idea people playing to their base. chuck schumer steps uptakes this $1.6 billion that was allocated offer on the table off. what does that do to the spirit of communication around the negotiating table? >> nothing. it had no bearing. >> really? >> no. we all know that it's part of the deal. we all know that. the leader had to say that to satisfy the far left. reality is, we all know from day one it's going to be a part of any solution. that's one of the reasons why republicans are discussing it. we want border security. there are a number of systems that have to be put in place. >> the president said it. >> ab

. >> el Ómnibus de la empresa fue impactado por un conductor que lo investigÓ con su trÁiler.cenas de familiares han esperado durante dos dÍas para reconocer a las vÍctimas y a todos los cuerpos que fueron rescatados. marÍa luisa martÍnez, univisiÓn. jorge: en salvador faltan escasos dÍas para que el departamento de seguridad nacional de estados unidos decida el futuro de 200,000 salvadoreÑos que viven en este paÍs bajo el tps . la terminaciÓn de este programa para y tienes y nicaragüenses, hay mucha incertidumbre, no sÓlo entre los salvadoreÑos, sino tambiÉn para sus hijos. salvador: cientos de nueve salvadoreÑos han iniciado el aÑo lleno de incertidumbre. en los prÓximos dÍas se definirÁ la extensiÓn o cancelación del tps y esto Último significarÍa problemas para sus casi 200,000 beneficiarios y sus familiares en estados unidos y en el salvador. >> no alcanza. no alcanza lo que uno gana. son ocho dÓlares lo que me pagan y en cambio lo que no manda mi hijo allÁ, ya es una ayuda un poquito mÁs. salvador: junto a argumentos como la contribuciÓn que hacen los salvadoreÑos benefi

i hope we have an omnibus before then. at least for me, it means closure.ty for everybody to stake their position out with regard to funding our military. >> so it sounds like that there were some republican concessions that were given to win your vote. were there concessions given to any of the democratic positions? >> i think -- once again, i'm not privy to all the discussions that occurred. i think first of all we recognize everybody's got to win part of it. our hope was that by extending the deadline into february to begin with, but then also making arrangements to assure that there would be a full discussion and the good possibility of actually coming to a consensus on the issue surrounding daca which has really driven a lot of the democrat interest here. we thought that that would be at least a step in the right direction. i think what some of our democratic colleagues wanted was an assurance of the passage of a daca bill. at this point, nobody can guarantee passage because there are multiple different points of view about how it should be done. since

logic behind voting on the bill again is partially political and partially to strip it out of the omnibus bill in which it was passed. we should be seeing that after the president's state of the union address is when they are looking to take those to the floor. that was part of a deal to get the house freedom caucus to vote on the continuing resolution. i guess we will see two votes in the house. >> if they raise defense spending to the have to raise domestic spending? >> what is interesting about that vote, we are talking about a vote on defense only appropriations in the house. i think most folks will acknowledge that is a nonstarter in the senate. democratssomething would pass. you kind of have to ask what is the rationale. is it a messaging bill? something that allows republicans to show their bona fides on national defense heading into an election year and at the same time hurt democrats that might vote against it because they believe in parity. >> what are you guys watching for? there could be another two crs. what are you watching for? >> interested to see what the budget proposal

then and only then will our appropriators be able to begin negotiations on the final f.y. 2018 omnibus spending bill to fund all our federal programs, defense and nondefense alike, through the rest of the fiscal year. it would have been nice if this had been done in september, mr. speaker, or maybe by october or the end of november or the end of defense. one might have hoped to have finally completed the job by the end of this month. that would be four whole months into the fiscal year 2018, but we all know that's not going to happen. now, i don't know about you, mr. speaker, but i sure hope we can get this f.y. 2018 appropriations bills all done before we have to start working on the fiscal year 2019 appropriations bills. now, there's a very, very simple reason why there's no budget agreement. the republicans are squabbling among themselves either raising the budget caps or making even deeper cuts in domestic spending. it's like the republican right wing is fighting with the republican extreme right wing. and, you know, i'll again remind my colleagues, as my colleague from wyoming did

when need to pass appropriation bills, and omnibus of some type to fund the various agencies of government and protect and serve our people. infrastructure is a significant piece of legislation. in our opinion, stabilizing the affordable care act so millions and millions of people are not or thethout health care prices of their premiums are substantially increased, we do not want either one of those objectives. we need to fix some of the things in the affordable care act that were not working as well as we projected. it is instructive to our republican friends that since they have been in office over the last year, support for the hasrdable care act substantially increased among the american public as they have seen its benefits. there are other pieces of legislation that we need to consider. they are the main ones i think we will be focusing on, we will see what the republicans put forward. there is a disagreement he tween the republican leadership in the house and the republican leadership in the senate. the house, speaker ryan said he wanted to, and having passed a tax bill that creates

we have giant omnibus spending bills, usually at the end of the year, and if we can't do it, we'll have a c.r., a continuing resolution, to keep funding the bill as is and have a giant bill with all the spending for the year. now, these c.r.'s are really, really hurting our military. they hurt all kinds of federal agencies because there's no predict antiquities acty, but the one -- predictability, but the one area that really gets hurt by the omnibus bills are the men and women in the u.s. military. as the presiding officer knows, general after general, civilian leader in the military, whether it's a democrat or republican, they come to the congress and come to our committee and see the c.r.'s are killing us. they are killing our readiness. and we all go, oh, yeah, we know it's important and then this body does nothing -- nothing. so it's not from a lack of effort. i'm going to tell a story that i think the other side doesn't want to remember, but i think it's really important to remember, particularly given what the minority whip had said earlier today. a number of us when we got elect

the other significant change is introduction of a on the bus model -- of a omnibus model from audibleccounts to make the process of buying and selling securities a lot easier and more streamlined. mark: has the recent corruption hit the inflows at all? original after the announcements were made, there where initial period there was a cooling off of foreign investor interest, but after it stabilized and after news from the local policymakers came out with respect to the progress that was being made, we started to see stabilization and reversal in terms of additional inflows starting to come back into the country since then. that has continued in the most recent period. mark: i must ask you about aramco because the company that's the country recently changed the state ofrecent aram. do you intend to amend rules to fit the offering in any way? we have been using the opportunity of the listing of saudi aramco as well as the significant privatization plans of the saudi government as a litmus test for the saudi regulations in terms of their readiness and capability. but we have found is in

and the other significant change is a planned introduction of an omnibus model for investors who manageple accounts, to make the process of buying and selling securities a lot easier and more streamlined. mark: has the recent corruption purge hindered inflows at all? so, after the original announcements were made, there where initial period there was a cooling off of foreign investor interest. after it stabilized and after news from the local policymakers came out with respect to the progress that was being made, we started to see a stabilization and a reversal in terms of additional inflows starting to come back into the country. continued theas most recent period. mark: i must ask you about aramco. changed aramco, essentially that signal will press ahead with of the ipo. toyou intend to amend rule fit the offering in any way? so, we have been using the opportunity of the listing of saudi aramco as well as a significant privatization plans of the saudi government as a for the saudi regulations in terms of their readiness and capability. what we have found is that in almost all cases, o

that way you avoid the crazy omnibus, continuing resolution debacle that we find ourselves in today, and most of the time. so we really focused on doing that and we tried. as a matter of fact the appropriations committee did a great job, a lot of hard work, very bipartisan, and they reported out 12 appropriations bills by the spring of 2015. and most of those bills, mr. president, were very bipartisan -- very bipartisan. so what we thought was, all right, that's a good start. everybody seems to want to do that. let's bring up the bill that's actually really important, 2015, the rise of isis, our troops are in combat. let's bring the defense appropriations bill, which came out of committee unanimously. every senator on the appropriations committee, democrat and republican, voted for that. let's bring that to the floor. so we did. so we did. let's have a debate. we're going to fund our military with these new talking points about supporting our troops. so what happened that summer, mr. president? the democratic leadership filibustered the spending for our troops. they wouldn't let us v

security or with respect to the continuing resolution to fund the government or with respect to the omnibusfund the government for the fiscal year. you don't have the consistency you like from the white house on this particular set of issues. i prefer clarity. i try to keep my positions as constant. i establish that reputation for the system that guides me. we do not see that from the white house. that makes our jobs more difficult. >> some stark words. where are we headed? >> one other factor, guys. it is not just about the d.r.e.a.m.ers. the huge division on spending. we will get a big increase for defense eventually. this year's 2018 budget -- we're four months into 2018 fiscal year and there is still no budget. for defense contractors and people counting on federal money, this is going to be an increasing story that would cause confidence to drop. i think this is another big angle. i think confidence, consumer confidence or market confidence or business confidence could erode if this lasts for weeks. >> clearly to watch with the dow above 26,000. unemployment rate low. we're fighting ab

. >> necessary in order to get crafted, an omnibus fully crafted with the agreed- to top line. liz: adam shapiro live on capitol hill. we saw the video and our world and viewers were riveted during the neil cavuto show, it looked like the nation was getting closer to perhaps immigration deal, are we reading this right or not? reporter: sarah sanders, the press secretary at the white house, saying in a behind doors session, they agreed to you might call it a two phased thing. i'm going to read what she's saying is agreed to negotiations immediately on border security, chain migration, the visa lottery system and, of course, a fix for daca, the deferred students who 800,000 who were brought here. you heard mitch mcconnell saying the funding bill they want a clean bill. don't tie immigration to it. chuck schumer, the minority leader in the senate, the democrat saying let's do daca as part of the spending bill. and the president during this roughly one hour televised negotiation was doing what he called a bill of love and comprehensive immigration reform for the 11 million illegal

it will take three to six weeks before we can get the omnibus that might do not just the rest of this year but next year as well. >> what about the fate of the daca recipients? the d.r.e.a.m.ers, as they're called. >> we have to have something done by march 5. >> there's a lot of republican that's feel very strongly that we know we have to address it in front of us. it is not easy. it would have been done a long time ago as we said earlier. there is a real desire. republicans and democrats to address the issue. coming together on it is the issue. as long as we tie with it border security and we're able to take care of the issues that our colleagues want and it is what the white house wants as well, i think we're moving in the right direction. everybody has to agree. the white house has to agree. we think they would at least take a good hard look at it. >> it has been months since the president changed the rules since last september. i know the clock is ticking. a lot of lawmakers, as you well know, complain about the lack of involvement from president trump. do you know the president'

it sounds like there has to be another cr as they write the omnibus, i think that is what senator cornyn talking about. i think we can come together and put this together in a way that america can be proud and fix it so that we are not here 30 years from now. we would keep us updated. great to have you with us tonight. israel has a long and complicated security barrier, more for my trip to israel and a look with what america can learn from israel's controversial separation mall. we talked to the guy who put it together. and how a tragedy in a small kentucky town is highlighting a disturbing trend. after the break, trace gallagher investigating a california law some claim giveses illegal immigrants the right to vote. we'll come right back and we'll come right back and separate fac you won't see these folks at the post office. we'll come right back and separate fac they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. get a 4 week trial, plus

. >> are you looking at one big omnibus bill door you think you'll break it into parts, angus? >> i think it's important to be clear. on the budget part, i think what we're looking at is agreement on breaking the caps, setting what they call the top line number, how much will be appropriated. at that point, nobody will be surpris surprised. there will have to be another continuing resolution of three weeks for the appropriation committees to actually write the details on the budget. a lot of that work has been done. but that's what we're talking about is an overall number and then the allocations between defense and the faa and the department of agriculture. a lot of that work can be done and can be done by in general february 8th and the final paperwork will be done in the next two weeks. if we can do that, and we're talking two-year numbers, that will be a big break through in terms of getting our work done and finally starting to at least think about doing budgets as they ought to do. both mike and i are very upset. one of the reasons i voted no on this bill the other night

security or with respect to this continuing resolution to fund the government or with respect to an omnibusvernment for the rest of this fiscal year. you don't have the kind of consistency that you would like emanating from the white house on this particular set of issues. >> we still don't have a plan from the white house what diversity lotteries should be replaced with. we still don't know what they want on chain migration other than comprehensive. >> let's bring in our chief washington correspondent, the anchor of "the lead," jake tapper. let's talk about this last-minute meeting the president is having now in the oval office with democratic leader chuck schumer, two guys from new york trying to come up with some sort of deal. >> two out of borough guys, and i think senator schumer is the politician to whom president trump, as a civilian, as given more money than any other individual candidate. you would think they are two guys who could make a deal, who could broker a deal on both th government funding resolution thgs.lso chip and daca and other but as you heard from republicans, mo bro

beyond where we are right now with uncertainty about funding the government, uncertainty about the omnibus, uncertainty about all these other things. and sooner is better obviously. because we do have a lot of things that we need to be working on. we need to start moving on this energy bill. we've got a lot of other initiatives that i think folks want to try to get to. daylight is wasting. >> senator, that you're has to do a lot of things before it can -- have talked to the administration on timelines about when things will start to happen, like assurances of whatt we get done this year, next year? >> well, since the passage of the bill, we all recognized there is a great deal that is preliminary to any level of activity there. the folks over at interior have put together their teams. they are working on things. but before we can ask them give us the timeline here, they need to map out and lay it out. so we'll have an opportunity for further sit down, but as of right now there is no schedule other than what we put into law, which was the timeframe of the two lease sales. but i think most d

and others in the department of defense, that the best way to keep them safe is for us to have an omnibus at the end of the fiscal year, instead of c.r. after c.r. after c.r. so honoring our oath to keep the american people safe and recognizing that in the domestic budget there are security initiatives that relate to homeland security, veterans, state department, anti-terrorism activities, and the justice department. we really need to have parody in our discussion on the budget. and the additional money that we want on the domestic side is what we're here to discuss this morning. so that people know what this discussion is about. we're not resenting -- we're supporting the defense initiatives, if that's what the department of defense think, we need to keep america safe. but at the same time, there's security functions on the domestic side and we want additional money to address some of the challenges that our country faces. and one of those that is really, very, very important, in every district in america, there is strong bipartisan support, every one of us on a path to an agreement, whi

it sounds like there has to be another cr as they write the omnibus, i think that is what senator cornynalking about. i think we can come together and put this together in a way that america can be proud and fix it so that we are not here 30 years from now. we would keep us updated. great to have you with us tonight. israel has a long and complicated security barrier, more for my trip to israel and a look with what america can learn from israel's controversial separation mall. we talked to the guy who put it together. and how a tragedy in a small kentucky town is highlighting a disturbing trend. after the break, trace gallagher investigating a california law some claim giveses illegal immigrants the right to vote. we'll come right back and separate facts from fiction julie is living with metastatic breast cancer which is breast cancer that has spread to other parts of her body. she's also taking prescription ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor, which is for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive her2- metastatic breast cancer as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus

. >> we are working to get a cap agreement but the appropriators will need time to write an omnibus appropriations once a cap agreement is matched. >> there is no point in having another cr unless we have an agreement on daca and funding. >> that leaves some to say pelosi is threatening a government shutdown based on an artificial deadline for daca. >> bret: we will follow it all. mike emanuel live on the hill. the senate is working on an extension of what most intelligence experts will tell you is a vital tool to fight terrorism and what privacy advocates say is potential unwarranted government snooping into her life. earlier today the house passed amended legislation on faisal, the foreign intelligence surveillance act. it could have a rougher go in the senate for a time today mixed signals from president trump sent lawmakers scrambling to be a fox team coverage. john roberts returns with a look at the politics of fisa and the president's tweets. we begin with catherine herridge. >> house reauthorized a bill with the vote of 256-154 and it had said the senate next week. words on a tight timeline