you are not reliant on three gigantic platforms for your news. you've got blue sky, macedon, the reds, there is a protocol if you post something on threads it also shows up on macedon. and if they join the same consortium all these platforms can reach much broader audiences. but again you would control of what you saw and what other people saw. i think that is what is critical. what's critical is to reduce the scale of the content moderation and increase its diversity and hand it back control to individual users. we got stuck because we did not see an economic model to make it viable. maybe it is just appearing maybe the market is providing that itself. last went okay. quick something struck me. he said at one point if something does not make sense is not going to continue. quick something is deeply unnatural is probably not going to continue. an obscure essay to issue already referred and patrick referred earlier that you wrote long ago i think you made the claim or at least suggested if something makes sense is not going to end. that is liberalism. it seems your belief the