the 70's l wilbehe t will be in p elsomla sse ous to 90ackll w , f stockbility with a hesid>is tem onexde ue vi ionsou'll see theraooes te th i o at .anslths i>> iaey mec nim o, recreaan boes f tasountf thghos cs ships fr a kayak. theyel tme spring but tours areprably thro. googleit, y sammy. from the potomac, live n justext >> tnight.t's emmy athwa ncluded 37ards i est hot on the wies game s thr season run inhthutstan poto as first tayanhetinil he we've been wto watching and talking about this flea bag sheeown b.its and pieces and it's very funny. i interviewed her last year, actuallyor the sol was paireoitglover, extremely talented. it's based in loon and deals with her character, who's called ne kevinrn ortnsed tv rkme t>>>e secp told a sing feder u p highssce thro ph♪ ♪. em in a country cungry for unity, thheeseburger and fries from tgi fridays is here. so let's come together foramerie our tasty signature cheeseburger and fries for five. cheeseburger. all da all night f tgayfrids. . >>or> mane th vacationers stuit w a wutay to getoftoachek br oldest tours gone belly up. thomas cook

but there was a broader sense ot whatever the express that meant was that was going onex that rights were being worked out and determine and they could potentially extend it more wisely than what had become before nerve. >> was a what was a wig and what he believed. >> i am going to answer the question moving ahead in time to the wig. this gets back to your question the boat parties. particularly now people like to go back in time and dress of the presence republican, goes all the way back to jefferson. there are no straight lines in historyes and there certainly no straight lines when it comes to political parties. parties balance back and forth the names change all of the time so for a while you had the democratic party, which was his own thing on the one hand and you had what was no more than the anti- jacksonians. it wasn't really a party it was likeke people who really aren't that. [laughter] that becomes the whig party and you end tough in the mid- 19th century with essentially for a while two main parties, one is jackson the democratic supposedly popular supposedly the common

that reflect your unique contributions and i refer to the fact that our numbers and in some cases are onex variances tells us that we still lack leadership and wonder if you would draw on your own career or those of others that you have observed to see if you can identify some of the key issues for why these gaps may process? >> good morning. one of the key reasons for the persisting is actually at the system level. you heard about over half of the life science going to women and the system has not changed to catch up with the changes in the workforce. promotion and tenure pathways have not changed. there are cultural issues around welcoming women and family-friendly policies that although they exist, women feel stigmatized and unwilling or hesitant to use that. there are pay differentials that we know about as an issue and we see that women publish less than men and in different journals and on different topics. that has a factor because we talk about promotion and tenure not changing and the advent of science and the importance of collaboration being critical to the science of today. int