ong? yes. mr. haney yes. ms. norton. yes, except no on number 11, the first item. >> the first m.o.u. under 11, thank you very much. mr. sanchez? >> yes. >> mr. calton? >> yes and on consent agenda item 12, m.o.u. 9 and 10, with regard to the m.o.u. between district and young developer i want to disclose i'm the director and will recuse myself on the vote of these m.o.u.s to avoid clils. >> thank you. conflict of interest. thank you. ms. mendoza-mcdonnell. >> yes. >> thank you very much, that's consent. section d is -- [cheers and applause] thank you. we had no item severed so section e is proposals for action. we have several board policies for adoption. if i hear no objection from the board, i'd like to take one vote on all of them? seeing no objection, word policy 1312.3, universal complaint procedure, board policy hazardous substances, board policy 5111 admissions and bored policy 5117, district attendance. 5111.1, district residency was removed from the item and returned to the rules committee for additional discuss

ong ye. mr. cook, yes. mr. haney yes. dr. murase yes. mr. sanchez, yes. mr. walton yes. president mcdonnell yes. >> i wonder if there is any pathway to allowing us to increase the fees beyond what they are? >> i think one of the things that has come up with the developer fees, the question whether there are enough developer fees to invest in a school. the idea around the fees is that we would be collecting to build a school in a community. but we never collect enough to build a school. but we collected over the course of several years, but it would be really interesting whether it is rules that we should kind of figure that out. even to the conversations we're having with planning. you know, how that whole thing works. ok. thank you. thank you, all. our next item is section h, discussion of other educational issues, there are none tonight. section i is consent calendars, there are none today. section j, proposal and assignment to committee, public and board comment on proposals, there are none. board poll 6184 continuation, education, board policy 6142.7, physical educat

ong yes. cook, yes. haney yes. norton yes. walton yes. mendoza-mcdonnell yes. >> seven ayes. thank you very much. [cheers and applause] thank you for all that attended and spoke. so our next item is section f, public comment on general matters. i have several speakers. so if i call your name please come up. margaret, karen, marianne kramer, steve, richard, carole, james cunningham, valerie, francisco, casey, chris, and lawrence. could i also just remind everyone that public comment is an opportunity for the board to hear from the community on matters within the board's jurisdiction. we ask that you refrain from using employee and student names. if you have a claim, you may submit it to the supervisor. our first speaker, please state your name. you have two minutes. >> thank you to the san francisco school board and the doctor for the opportunity to speak tonight. i'm a teacher here in san francisco unified, my employee number 18505. i'm here to request the superintendent and president honor article 39.6.8 in the contract that simply states the program should be reviewed annua

ong - two things that haven left out. anspor t now, people are eected to walk a qrter of a mile to the bus stop. if ye a senior or a disabled person, it's a hardship. th second abon should address congestion, you remove parking spaces, you remove driving lanes. you have an increased volume of cars coming. yeah. you are going to have congestion. that's one contributory factor. in addition t uber and lyft. asart of the plan.d be examined this is a long-standing problem. it's not been addressed. when you increase the walking distance, oing p public transportation. also, when you constrict the driving lanes, there's more of a pileup of cars. there are areas -- neighborhoods where congestion did not exist before. now it does. try california streets in the richistr dt. it didn't used to be this way. now it is. now there's several streets that are could not justed. i recnd tha the mta and c examine their congested thinkig and be more realistic. >> thank you. anymore c , public comment is closed. directors, this is a discussion item only. there's no action, but the public speakers, we did, you know, hear,he h