onufriy said this is such a signal that exactly 30 years ago, a council was convened in kharkiv by theof the orthodox church of ukraine. the decisions made determined the future path of our church and the past 30 years of church life. life has proven the correctness and expediency of these resolutions, i don't remember what was the only thing, first there was secession, and then they changed their minds in kharkiv, yes. they met twice there, the kharkiv cathedral of the 92nd year. let's see. let's because this it is important aha kharkiv cathedral of the 92nd year under the leadership of no codem distrust of philaret ot well at first filaret had trust and from what would be said to separate the request for autocephaly among those who signed was by the way onufriy aha yes of course he was young then but he was already a metropolitan and he signed, and then they refused, and it is still considered to be such a pseudo. well, well, or if you say and if suddenly i understand that this is absurd now i am asking but i myself sometimes think about it, but suddenly tomorrow kirill says yes let'

afraid of the pressure that is regularly exerted on his church from the other side. sees it, well, onufriyaine, he understands. in other words, his former position was so russophile, or there openly about moskovska was to change. i don’t know here, it’s just necessary that fellow journalists who have the opportunity, who specialize in church topics, approach onufriy and question him in detail so that he outlines who is putin, who is gundyaev, what is russian intervention , so that he gives his assessment of the crimes committed by the russian federation, after that we will be able to really find out what is the position of unufry, but what he participated in this, this is also a certain signal that he does not want to participate in further responsibility for russian crimes because what is happening is very serious. does this mean an indulgence for the future for what was done at least until the 24th ? we understand that the war struck a huge rough line and is being reinstalled in general, the assessment throughout the country we understand well, we understand how huge the revolution, i am

i do not sympathize with any of them at all, but i simply believe that metropolitan onufriy as a person, well, i hope by faith that there are not many believers in this patients, but he is definitely a believing person. well, he should think about his responsibility to those who go to the temples of the ukrainian orthodox church, because they go and hear how they lavry today, today they commemorate kirill, the patriarch of the bandit war, of course a corrupt person as his great master, well, i apologize, well, a woman has a child at the front, a husband died, a russian soldier raped her daughter , she comes to god and hears that metropolitan onufriy or some other metropolitan of the uoc mp commemorates a bandit who did not even condemn it, this is right, the patriarch of phraseology says that they expected that they wanted to condemn yours well, they didn't, but only until the negotiations continue what stop the bloodshed and i'm talking about this cathedral they didn't condemn the war either and they continue to commemorate cyril, despite the fact that they condemned, they say that cyr

he said that he understands the position of metropolitan onufriy of kyiv, which is why by his words,ave the maximum wisdom of the priest of the church, it is meant to act with the maximum wisdom so as not to complicate the life of the believing people, this was a quote, what does it all mean, did the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate really become independent from moscow, let's talk further with us, priest george kovalenko the rector of the open orthodox university of st. sophia and in the past i have to remind the spokesman of the uoc mp we and you congratulate good day christ is risen truly he is risen you can greet like this say so please explain what the council passed on may 27, what was the decision about, well, you know, we still don't really have these changes to the uoc statute, but for sure we have, you know, such a hybrid decision of a hybrid church. that is, we have a document that everyone can interpret as he wants, and that's why in fact if you read the documents themselves that were adopted and not only the comments on them, yes, and we will see that

will go down in world history, and it is very important, of course, that, by the way, metropolitan onufriyon putin to release fighters from azov, we understand that this is probably the eye of the one who cries out in the desert well, but tomorrow we expect that joseph biden , the president of the united states, will sign the law on lend-lease, or hypothetically, this will not happen. and if it does happen, if we believe that to what extent it will change the situation in ukraine, well, firstly, psychologically in ukraine and in russia as well. well, then i understand from the military and financially, please, well , first of all, i frankly did not think that it would be such a specially timed application on may 9 actually we actually need the data now, but we also need the pace, well, the only thing i can say is that the weapons were already coming to us with the available resources allocated by the congress. therefore, we will already see this in the next period, when it is really very symbolic, even from the point of view of historical parallels, a law that is bipartisan to be adopted b

will go according to plan, and from their point of view , that is, they believe that metropolitan onufriythey would certainly, and we , would have given the order. and i i believe that this person is simply a circumstance, and these circumstances forced him to express himself the way he expressed himself. but they are also ambiguous, you know, that is, the truth is that they have not seen the documents themselves. the church is independent from the moscow patriarchate, and if you are the metropolitan, you do not need to approve it, it means that you are the patriarch of moscow, and others have found such, for example . er, so let’s look at the documents themselves. but for now, i have a lot of questions about all the absolutely formulated points that were made on the official page of the ukrainian orthodox church. good, ms. lyudmylo. if we assume that such tectonic changes really took place there, then you can tell who this church will be subordinate to if they break unity with moscow and do not want to join the orthodox church of ukraine, which is headed by bishop epiphany, and according

kirill, asking me to be dismissed from a leadership position in the russian orthodox church signed onufriy one of the stories, he just enters there if i am not mistaken, i may be mistaken in the synod and the russian church, and i mean that now the church supposedly has the autocephaly from the russian church, but that does not mean that it is the same and we perfectly understand that , unfortunately, a lot of uh, well, let's say this, the ministers of this church showed themselves in a bad way in a good light during the russian aggression, and what's more, there were already facts that were even made public by the security service of ukraine that some of them were even gunners for enemy soldiers, mr. viktor, does this mean that such a thing will be announced about the withdrawal from the uoc mp from the rpc, well, independent churches, the automatic joining of the uoc mp to the orthodox church of ukraine, the only canonical orthodox church on the territory of ukraine. this is absolutely. i think that this is absolutely not there is such a scenario that is not even being considered right n

information about what happened in theophany and i only read the introductory speech from metropolitan onufriyy short report , in fact, he already laid in the heads of those who took participation in this meeting is a kind of message, a kind of constant, and they boil down to one thing. in the current conditions, the ukrainian orthodox church will stand and win, but i did not understand who it would oppose and who it would win. then we can only guess about the course of events that took place at this meeting, we are special experts. i mean, we did not expect any drastic changes or coordination decisions, because we see that this church has been in existence since the 14th year. yes to put it figuratively, the cat is pulling the tail, that is, from the 14th year it was clear who russia is in relation to ukraine and due to the annexation of crimea due to the partially occupied territories of the donbass, donetsk and luhansk regions . intervention, moreover, these were military interventions of russia on our sovereign land, they thought that these three months and 92 days we are already waging th

services, and the head of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, metropolitan onufriyi call on everyone to stop the war and we sat down at the negotiating table today, after three months, bought for a large-scale war ukrainian orthodox church of moscow patriarchate is going to a discussion about its future, the question arises whether the clergy of the moscow patriarchate will break ties with moscow, because the majority of ukrainians are in favor, this is evidenced by the results of a nationwide survey conducted by a sociological group, the rating of 74% of surveyed ukrainians believe that the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate should break ties with by the russian orthodox church, only 7% do not support this initiative today at 11 o'clock in the morning in the panteleimon monastery in feofania the planned meeting of bishops of the clergy of monasticism and the laity, at which the fate of the church of the moscow patriarchate natalia tkachuk will probably be discussed, the only news at the public meeting, we will discuss this topic with our guest, ah

all the priests of the moscow patriarchate parishioner, did they initially expect what propolyte onufriyand on march 10, their synod took place, which had not been held for a long time, and when i read the resolution of this synod, i realized that it was nothing. on march 10, i can imagine that there were already a lot of events that took place in ukraine. where the russians killed everyone. in other words, we understand that they killed and are killing, and it did n't matter, they tortured the priests, and they killed all of them, whether it was a child or a priest or a church or everyone. i expected a bigger reaction when i realized that there was no such reaction will be because it won't be when i realized that the only legislative way so that it wouldn't be a folk illustration so that it wouldn't be that way, you know, they came and seized it. i think that it should happen by law, and the law consists of just five points. it is very simple, nobody has them if we have to talk about the fact that we have collaborationism, we banned russian business, we closed the accounts of those wher

, yes, and it was used, but you know, uh, when the head of the russian orthodox church in ukraine onufriytarts talking about extracine . it appeals to russian president vladimir vladimirovich putin with a request to save the military with a request to save the wounded, and then i have a question for his holiness anufry. he really worries for the safety of people's lives, or simply became a part of this manipulation machine. west that i would not like to believe in anything, as an orthodox first of all, because i came to church, and i asked for salvation, and he absolved sins, and today onufry has become a tool that is manipulated why because, if onufry was in fact worried about the life or saving the lives of ukrainians, then he should first of all turn to president zelensky with a request not for extraditions, but for zelensky to sign surrender in fact. this would have saved not only the people in mariupol who were not caught, but also those ukrainians who are dying today in the donbass in the luhansk region. and how many thousands more will die in all those military clashes, where are t