was closed. that he is building god's world in ukraine, not russian peace, but from 2014 to 2022, onufriy the synod of the russian orthodox church, and with the beginning of the great war, he left the synod and announced that that his church goes out and starts independent. life in ukraine, but in these eight years, which were between 14 and 22, onufry was not prevented from participating in the meetings of the russian orthodox church in russia, and gundyaev was not prevented from talking about the fact that we have a church on the territory of ukraine state, and even though this church is called the ukrainian orthodox church, it has long been actually russian. the orthodox church and the name does not change anything, moreover, literally half an hour ago i had the general of the sbu in the reserve viktor yagun on the air and he says that at the moment about 70 priests of this so-called ukrainian orthodox church are on various matters, well, most of them are cases about collaboration or about the fact that they work for a foreign company. the federal security service of the russian federa

moreover, the attitude of our church to this his beatitude metropolitan onufriy of kyiv and all ukrainelicly expressed a long time ago. we are not building a russian peace, we are building god's world. well, you see how onufry closed with this thesis that he is building god's world in ukraine, not russian peace, but starting from 2014 to 2022 onufry was a member of the synod of the russian orthodox church and with the beginning of the great war he left the synod and actually announced that his church was leaving. and begins an independent life in ukraine, but in these eight years that were between in the 14th and 22nd years, onufry was not prevented from participating in the meetings of the russian orthodox church in russia, and gundyaev was not prevented from saying that we have a church on the territory of the ukrainian state and that this church, although it is called the ukrainian orthodox church, but ... it has long been in fact the russian orthodox church, and the name does not change anything, moreover, literally half an hour ago i had on the air the general of the sbu in the res

, tries to condemn it, or let's say, distance itself from the russian orthodox church, it is onufriy after all. and continues to remember cyril among the patriarchs, orthodox patriarchs, and in this way makes it clear that, in principle, everything remains in those places, only they declared declaratively that they are not part of the russian orthodox church. well, i think that many people understand, at least in our committee, which is headed by the representative of the servant of the people party, mykyta potoraev, and yevgenia kravchuk, who was your deputy, the other representatives of this faction today unanimously voted for... the draft in the second reading together with representatives of other factions, well, ours european solidarity, and for the future and the homeland, i know that the trust will vote for it, just not all the servants understand it, there is a rather large such pro-russian church group in the servants, which defends the interests of this church, and there is a plus point of these groups of the former opzzh, who will also speak out against it, and most other

this war, with the ukrainians or with the russians, even in spite of this anti-kyriv rhetoric, which onufriynow conducting, well, this one. rhetoric is not enough to convince ukrainians that this church defends the interests of ukrainians and opposes the war russia and ukraine. another very important issue is telegram in ukraine, and we had yaroslav yurchyshyn, the head of the specialized parliamentary committee on freedom of speech on the air, we talked with him, we started this conversation about whether it is possible to block the media in ukraine. the telegram platform, since russians are connected to this media platform, and where there are russians, there is necessarily the fsb. well, what does yurchyshyn say? he says that the ukrainian authorities are currently studying the experience of introducing sanctions against social networks in the united states and spain to block telegram. according to yurchyshyn, it is necessary to have a clear argumentation for the nsdc's decision regarding sanctions, for example, and for this to happen some serious critical situation with a leak of informa

uoc of the moscow patriarchate, and yes... he also cooperated with the superior of the uoc propolit onufriyarge-scale personnel changes, the people most criticized by society, including anti-corruption organizations, for corruption, respectively, kept their positions, i mean oleg tatarov and rostislav shurma. there is such an opinion, voiced by some political scientists, that now both shurma and tatarov will only strengthen his position. is there any reason to think so, and who else could be affected by optimization in the office of the president? this is what we are talking about next. volodymyr fasenko, a political scientist, joins our broadcast. volodymyr, good evening. good evening. simple first question. is andrii yarmak strengthening his influence after these resignations? and he had it big enough anyway. is there no place to go? i think that no significant changes have taken place. what must be understood, because many commentators and journalists have such, i would say, fair paranoia. in everything. they they see yermak's hand, even where the decision comes from zelensky, they see y

clergy of the so-called moscow patriarchate have dual citizenship, have russian passports, even uncle onufriy, the one who was once a ukrainian orest berezovsky and a russian passport, well, that's all, they applied the norm as it was. is it done with korban or with kolomoisky and everything else that they do not act like that? because it is possible, first, many supporters of this patriarchy who still continue to serve the kremlin, because we have not cleansed the state of the fifth column, which is present everywhere, from the authorities to the special services, the parliament, we still have representatives of the fifth column in verkhovna rada. as deputies and give their votes for those laws that are not enough, because they cannot finally hold a dialogue with the democratic the opposition and agree on those important issues of the agenda that are strategic for us to survive, to win the war, and this is a top priority, but unfortunately, you have seen at least one meeting of the president with representatives of the democratic opposition or just parla'. comments of the verkhovna rada of u