the second was brown versus board of education, the desegregation case and the third was gid onversus wainwright, the case that if one could not afford a lawyer, one be appointed counsel in felony cases. this is not to be a lecture on the warren court, but if one tried to sum it up, one would have to say that the warren court was not especially concerned with technical doctrine. i mean, i think the current -- if you could sum it up, the warren court wanted to do the right thing, and get it right and solve the problems and basically move on, and it's fundamental themes seem to have been fairness and equality. those were two ideas that i think helped explain the warren court opinions. now, that was 1969. that was 40 years ago. well, you remember how vocal critics of the warren court were. if you thought the court was active in 1969, think about the turf that is now been constitutionalized by the supreme court since the warren court, since 1969. a number of areas that were not on the court's docket then, which became constitutionalized, you could give some of these examples, abortion, rowe versus w