director of this institute was aryeh nair, a jewish human rights activist, who later went to the open society foundationd by george soros. severus. he was one of the staunch defenders of israel, who established an important human rights institution with the establishment of the open society foundation, which focused on political changes in non-aligned countries. founded by peter bennson. bennson, who was born in a jewish family , later declared his religion as christianity catholic and changed his name from solomon to peter. he also criticized some of israel's behavior apparently. he was one of the defenders of israel's survival. his family was one of the oldest wealthy families of russian descent, who strongly supported the idea of ​​zionism and the return of jews to the holy land decades before the establishment of israel. another of the largest human rights organizations is the committee of jurists for human rights. the committee that was formed by two jews. became. the first founder louis henkin was the son of rabbi yosef eliyahu henkin. a rabbi who specialized in jewish law. self lewis henkin, who

we can cross live to cop28 and speak to open society foundation's director for climate justice.nerable countries through herfoundation. let's talk about the draft agreement that we have been hearing about. it is disappointing to see this type of disagreement between various countries at a climate summit where we hope there would be some kind of cohesion? , , , cohesion? yes, this debate is problematic— cohesion? yes, this debate is problematic and _ cohesion? yes, this debate is problematic and we _ cohesion? yes, this debate is problematic and we know - cohesion? yes, this debate is| problematic and we know that cohesion? yes, this debate is i problematic and we know that in order to keep a hope of reaching 1.5 degrees, we know according to science that we will need to keep most of the fossil fuels underground and what those options imply is that we can continue to invest... we can't continue to invest in fossil fuels while making investments in renewables, and the doubling of subsidies for fossil fuels renewables, and the doubling of subsidies forfossilfuels is subsidies for f

office ukrainian president yarmak. a curious agreement with the chairman of the unwanted open society foundationsy to guess whose son this is by his last name. the document was published by french investigative journalist jules vessan. it talks about the burial of toxic chemical waste from western companies on the territory of ukraine. it’s hard to imagine environmentally friendly projects; the text of the agreement was studied by my colleague pavel toropov. has kyiv already found land for waste? oh, yes, vadim, the area of ​​the chemical repository can be more than 400 km. toxic servant-master relationship. it would seem that it’s high time to stop being surprised by the cynical pragmatism of ukraine’s western curators, but it doesn’t work. they found a new way to use the square. will chemical waste be buried in fertile black soil, or where black soil was once present? i know that even now. europe exports some of these black soils in exchange for its gifts, and that some kind of chemicals will be pumped there in order to change the surrounding soil and deteriorate it. in my opinion, this is as

open society foundation by alexander soros. it’s easy to guess whose son this is by his last name.shed by french investigative journalist jules wissan. it is about the disposal of toxic chemical waste from western companies on the territory of ukraine. it’s hard to imagine environmentally friendly projects; the text of the agreement was studied by my colleague pavel toropov. pavel, kyiv have you already found land for waste? oh yes, vadim. chemical repository can be more than 400 km. toxic relationship in the servant-master format. it would seem that it’s high time to stop being surprised by the cynical pragmatism of ukraine’s western curators, but it doesn’t work. they found a new way to use the square. chemical waste will be buried in fertile black soil, or where black soil was once present. i know that even now europe exports some of these black soils. in exchange for their gifts and that some kind of chemicals will be sent there for in order to change the surrounding soil, to worsen it. in my opinion, this, as evgeny peremakov said, is counterproductive. there are six chemical

having witnessed the scenes here, he's a researcher for the open society foundations. of course, the west and box saw spot to n g o. and he said that the european union flag was a symbol of democracy. and he, alum, positive, in your opinion, said that they should be doing more. and now the students comp time overnight, outside the foreign ministry. this was that protest. it started on friday all to do part of a 24 hour sleep problem. they said that they come outside the foreign ministry. this is a deliberate target that they will seeking for an intervention. when i press them on this, they said that they were seeking sanctions on president outage on the boutiques and leaders of the serbian government from the your opinion, from the united states and from other institutions. now they've been very clear. they said that lucas was leading a brutal regime that he's a dictator. i'll have to say so far, the protests have been very calm. they've been very peaceful. that has been no police presence on like uh, there's things that we saw on sunday where that was fine and cautiou

they had fine- tuned their product to identify people affiliated with george soros and the open society foundations who are pushing for democratic reforms and hungary. they said, this would be a great tool for keeping them out. in it, they were really affiliated with these conservative causes. how could things to allergy -- use technology in political weight? >> when you are talking about what is different about clearview and not necessarily a thick illogical breakthrough, but ethical of sorts where they were willing to do what other were not necessarily. you talk about how they get photos of this basis. the example is classic. venmo . it is so interesting that they took this real-time feed and pull photos. facebook making profile photos public by default, then being able to scrape those photos. facebook assures people that the technology exists to make sure that you can't take the photos. what i was confused about is, how did clearview come through and scrape all of the facebook photos when they weren't supposed to be able to? >> there is a problem for all of us in terms of dealing with privacy. o

presentation that they had find tuned their product, identify people with george soros and the open society foundationwho are kind of pushing for democratic reforms in hungary. and they said here this would be a great tool for keeping them out. and so just in, i think it's because there were really affiliated with these kind of conservative causes, but it shows how how you could use a technology like this in a very chilling political way. yeah. and one of the things i think so interesting when you were in the book about what's different about clearview you are not necessarily a technology breakthrough, but an ethical breakthrough of sorts where they were willing to do what other others were not. and you talk about how scrapes, billions of photos of faces using basically what was available. and there you know, the ashley madison example is classic and then venmo that that's so interesting they basically took this real time feed we're going to just like pull these photos but then facebook you know making profile photos public by default and then being able to to scrape all of those photos. so facebook a

presentation that they had find tuned their product, identify people with george soros and the open society foundationwho are kind of pushing for democratic reforms in hungary. and they said here this would be a great tool for keeping them out. and so just in, i think it's because there were really affiliated with these kind of conservative causes, but it shows how how you could use a technology like this in a very chilling political way. yeah. and one of the things i think so interesting when you were in the book about what's different about clearview you are not necessarily a technology breakthrough, but an ethical breakthrough of sorts where they were willing to do what other others were not. and you talk about how scrapes, billions of photos of faces using basically what was available. and there you know, the ashley madison example is classic and then venmo that that's so interesting they basically took this real time feed we're going to just like pull these photos but then facebook you know making profile photos public by default and then being able to to scrape all of those photos. so facebook a

byrne, who shared the figures at last night's society last night's open society foundations expressedyounger attitudes. her report detailing that only 52% of britons aged 18 to 34 think democracy is a force for good. that's compared to 79% of people aged over 55 who took the same view. so what is triggering this undemocratic way of thinking? dorothy byrne puts it down to a loss of trust among young people in politics. evans her findings suggesting that the media's apparent inability to hold of us in politics to hold those of us in politics to account, encourages idea of account, encourages the idea of the living the the country living under the rule very own kim jong rule of our very own kim jong un. perhaps this has something to do with the ever increasing list of institutions that continue to be granted power, that ought to be in the hands of democratically elected politicians. back to my politicians. well, back to my panel politicians. well, back to my panel. paul goodman and nigel nelson. paul this is deeply shocking, isn't it? 29% would like a dictatorship . like a dictatorship.

byrne, who shared the figures at last night's society last night's open society foundations expressedyounger attitudes. her report detailing that only 52% of britons aged 18 to 34 think democracy is a force for good. that's compared to 79% of people aged over 55 who took the same view. so what is triggering this undemocratic way of thinking? dorothy byrne puts it down to a loss of trust among young people in politics. evans her findings suggesting that the media's apparent inability to hold of us in politics to hold those of us in politics to account, encourages idea of account, encourages the idea of the living the the country living under the rule very own kim jong rule of our very own kim jong un. perhaps this has something to do with the ever increasing list of institutions that continue to be granted power, that ought to be in the hands of democratically elected politicians. back to my politicians. well, back to my panel politicians. well, back to my panel. paul goodman and nigel nelson. paul this is deeply shocking, isn't it? 29% would like a dictatorship . like a dictatorship.