and i oppenheimer is against that.and he sees this sort of as hypocritical you're the guy who invented these, how can you now turn against them? so it isn't one big beef. it's just growing number of beefs that they that straws manages to whack them over the head with when he gets some power. all right. thank you. we've also had quite a few people who wanted to know what you could tell us about the edward teller oppenheimer relation chip hitch. it's equally bad. you know, teller shows up in the movie and they clash little bit there. but it's after the where edward teller, unlike oppenheimer, is. 100% pro nukes build bigger, build them more powerful and they clash over that, too. so you know, oppenheimer doesn't like that. that teller is this cavalier talking about how we should fight the next war with nuclear weapons. he thinks this like crazy i'm going to lead to destruction of everyone and so you know teller comes and testifies in the security clearance hearing kind of throws oppenheimer under the bus a little bit the

frankly speaking, if in the film oppenheimer there had been even an echo that robert oppenheimer was,hristopher nolan’s entire scheme would have gone to waste. in fact, today the film corresponds more or less to the traditional agenda of the democratic party, which has always been the nest. oscar academy, this is a movie about a levada professor, obsessed with the idea of ​​nuclear fission, by man, about a man, who in his youth, due to the peculiarities of the great depression, messed around with the communists, which is now blamed on him, all sorts of evil right-wingers, everything is just like it is happening now, here... the bright leftists of the democratic party, here are the right-wingers who want to make america again great, and isolating, closed to the rest of the world, another thing is that yes, if oppenheimer’s levada interests at some point led her to work for soviet intelligence, this makes the figure much brighter, more voluminous and interesting than oppenheimer played, too this year's oscar winner. for the modern american public, thus the oscar is once again confined t

did exactly the same thing, frankly speaking, if in the film oppenheimer it had sounded at least anrt oppenheimer everything -after all, he was an informant for our intelligence service. christopher nolan's entire scheme would go to waste. in fact, today the film corresponds more or less precisely to the traditional agenda of the democratic party, whose nest has always been hollywood, which, and accordingly, the academy oscar. this is a movie about a levada professor, obsessed with the idea of ​​nuclear fission, by a man, about a man who was in his youth. led her to work for soviet intelligence, this makes the figure much brighter, more voluminous and interesting than the one played by oppenheimer, also an oscar winner. this year's honoree, kilion murphy. in any case, he is a more interesting figure, but completely unacceptable for the modern american public. thus, oscar once again focuses on internal american problems, again ceases to be, frankly speaking, a major world cinema award. if they slightly changed the plot, it would be on the other hand. the picture simply would not have

frankly speaking, if in the film oppenheimer there had been even an echo that robert oppenheimer was,me would have gone to hell. basket, in fact, today the film corresponds more or less to the traditional agenda of the democratic party, whose nest has always been hollywood, which... fortunately, the picture of the killer of the flower moon, despite the age of eighty-one of the applicant, meets the highest standards, but this year scarzeza flew like veneer over paris, as he always did, almost always over the previous 50 years, in fact, his relationship with oscar. things always went badly for martin lucanovich, perhaps the most the academy's first great disaster occurred with the first of corcese's great films, taxi driver. in 1976, an outstanding movie, maybe even the best movie from corseze, lost to sylvester stallone's film, rocky 1. actually, it's hard for me to imagine any competition at all, even a competition for films about a boxer. at the same time, it did not completely trample the masculine essence of film academics; they decided to at least somehow respond to this then femi

, the question: was the great physicist, the very first creator of atomic weapons, robert oppenheimer the ussr. the kgb did not exist then. the ministry was renamed fifty third year. but there is every reason to believe that the great physicist worked quite seriously and quite consciously for our foreign intelligence service. the person most directly involved in the most secret state secrets said this most directly at one time in his memoirs. he directly said that all the leaders of the atomic project worked for our intelligence service for our nuclear industry, not only the exposed fuchs, but also oppenheimer, and szillar and bohr and fermi, he said that informants on nuclear issues in the manhattan project in there were about 200 people on our side, and many today say it’s about a memoir. sudoplatov should be treated with some skepticism, but nevertheless, everyone who doubts the accuracy of his memoirs has never in their life had the same level of clearance as general sudoplatov himself had. what was the reason for such readiness of american physicists to work for us? it seems that

"oppenheimer" is history. "oppenheimer" warnings, about we don't want arms races, giants weapons.ons. we have unstable places. we have risks of terrorists. we have risks of accidents. we are seeing with ukraine and other -- north korea, et cetera, we are seeing a return of the possibility of deliberate use, which is all very, very scary. we think we gotta get the public understanding that they have -- they have influence. first, they have to understand the issue. i think "oppenheimer" was a great service in doing that. >> fusion can save us. be careful with enthusiastic yard weapons. protect the almosts. >> comedy is the answer to all of this. laugh. >> laugh together. come together and laugh. there we are. wonderful panel. i hope you come back. we'll be right back. ♪ i am, said i ♪ ♪ and i am lost and i can't ♪ punch buggy red. ♪ even say why ♪ ♪ i am, i said ♪ ♪ ♪ ok y'all we got 10 orders coming in... big orders! starting a business is never easy, but starting it 8 months pregnant... that's a different story. i couldn't slow down. we were starting a business from the ground up.

well, it's robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer spoke of hale doctor the rephrase sprang to mind in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico. he lived a team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget. to build 3 atomic bombs, giving us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2. that it goes to serious damage across the yeah. usually that we're a small and then uh doesn't was he missed which ones a distributor. so thought he was going to do all of these skills shortly, and this is a for sure appointment to store out them. fortunately. mean it's lovely, spoke to matthew, a door still have to be made to a horse squeeze me through. and it could be a separate source, what would the do run into a single shortly, or a gun isn't stressed, money spent, or we're particularly in there regardless, they should, they're so sort of to go to scale what you on there. but if it was them, you know, it seems check what chapter of a credit given is spent on the didn't yet we're on opposed to the best number to get you through and then

robert oppenheimer was, after all, an informant for our intelligence, christopher nolan's entire scheme would have gone to waste. in fact, today the film answers more or less exactly the traditional agenda of the democratic party, whose nest has always been hollywood, which, and, accordingly, the oscar academy. this is a movie about a levada professor who is obsessed. another thing is that yes, if oppenheimer’s levada interests at some point led her to work for soviet intelligence, this makes the figure much brighter, more voluminous and interesting than oppenheimer was played by, also this year’s oscar winner, kilion murphy. in any case, he is a more interesting figure, but completely unacceptable for modern american public. and thus the oscar is once again confined to internal american problems, again it ceases to be , frankly speaking, an award for great world cinema, and if they had slightly changed the plot, then on the other hand, the film simply would not have made it into the top ten most interesting, they would not have allowed this, and for my part, i want to say that on the e

one painting from the zaks collection unexpectedly appeared in a scene from christopher nolan's oppenheimer. a few months later, the same painting turned up in anotherfilm, the wonderful story of henry sugar by wes anderson. i'm beatrice gimpel and i'm swiss and i'm partly french through marriage, but i've lived here in london in the uk for 49 years — 49 very happy years. my parents, especially my father, were very interested in paintings and sculpture and from the mid—late �*60s, early �*70s on, he bought extensively anything he liked. and he did a lot of his homework inviting, talking to artists, so there was no doubt that what he bought was always first class. and after he died, when we had the first inheritance meetings, when one of the experts said that a whole range of paintings were dubious... ..we were absolutely shocked and we didn't believe it to start with. so i'm currently sitting on flight 317, london to zurich, to go and look at the paintings which were willed to beatrice by her parents, and my role, really, is to just see if the doubts that beatrice had are in any wayjustifie

the destroyer of wells, robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer, spoke of halifax. the rephrase sprang to mind in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon tested new mexico. the la team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget to build 3 atomic bombs, giving the us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2, the visitors to say a scam. because the usually we have a slowing in the midst, which was distributed. so you know, some good though a lot of these skills shortly and this is a for sure appointment to store at them socially. i mean it's lovely. spoke to matthew through stuff in the media to of what square has been throwing up. there could be a separate source. what would the do? i knew a single shortly or a gun isn't stressed. my pin, we're particularly out there hold on visionaire. so sort of the scale of what you on the yeah for the most of them, you know, as soon as i can reach out to the credit union has spent that no, they didn't yet we're on a posted anywhere on the best number to get you through and then sort of comp

, the american physicist oppenheimer spoke of how dr. the rephrase sprang to mind in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico team. the team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget, to build 3 atomic bombs, giving the us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2, the fund that it goes to serious damage across the usually around that. we're slowing in the midst, which ones in the city. so thought he was going to do all of these skills shortly and this is a for sure appointment to store them socially. i mean it's lovely. spoke to matthew through slots in the me to a horse squeeze me through and they could give me a separate source. what were the, do i need a single show in the quote, the gun isn't stressed money spent, or we're particularly often there around us. fish in there. so sort of go on the scale. what you on the yeah. but what's the soonest, a quick chat, the credit union has spent, i know they're doing it, we're on a posted anywhere on the best number to get you through

it'd be like the splinter of the mice you one on become dense, the destroyer of welts, robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer spoke of hale doctor the rephrase sprang to mind in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico. he lived a team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget, to build 3 atomic bombs, giving the us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2, the, to say, a standard across the yeah, generally. but i remember we have a sloan and doesn't, was he missed which one? the distributor. so thought he was going to do all of these skills shortly. and this is a for sure appointment to store awesome. those are the minutes looking this look to may. theodore still have to be made to a horse squares new throwing up. there could be a separate source. what were the driving a single shortly with a gun different stress one spinner, we're particularly up in there. hold on a fishing there. so should i go on the scale, what you on the yeah, i don't know. what's them you know, it seems check what chapter of a credit even is

well, it's robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer spoke of hale doctor the rephrase sprang to mind in 1945 just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico team. the team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget to build 3 atomic bombs, giving us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2. the found that it was to say a standard across the yeah, just really, really a small and then uh and what was he missed? which one a facility. so thought he was going to do all of these skills shortly. and this is a for sure appointment to store them socially. i mean it's lovely. spoke to the door, stephanie made it to a horse squares need to know it could be a separate source. what were the grinding a single shortly or a gun isn't stressed, money spent, or we're particularly up in there. hold on a fishing there so. so to go to scale what you on the yeah. i don't know. what's them, you know, it seems check what chapter of a credit given is spent on what they're doing yet we're on opposed to their new what are the best number to get you through a

robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer, spoke of how dr. very phrase sprang to mind in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico. he lived a team of scientists for 3 years, with a $2000000000.00 budget. to build 3 atomic bombs, giving the us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2. the cost of serious damage across the yeah, definitely that we're slowing and doesn't was he missed? which ones? the distributive so thought he was going to do all of these skills shortly and this is a for sure appointment to store them socially. i mean, it's lovely store may be a girl slap in the me to a horse squeeze me through and they could give me a separate source. what were the learning a single show and the coworker got an infant stress money spent of we're particularly up in there. hold on for sure there. so sort of going to do. so the scale, what you on there for the rest of them, you know, as soon as check on the chapter of credit when it has been done, when you're doing it, we're on a place to earn your bu

, the american physicist oppenheimer, spoke of hale doctor, the rephrase frank, combined in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico. he lived a team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget to build 3 atomic bombs, giving us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2, the, the cost of serious damage across the yeah, generally. but i remember we're slowing and doesn't work because we missed which ones. and this is what the deal is going to do. let me skip was shown here, and this is a for sure appointment to store them socially minutes looking this look for may theodore still out of the media to of, of what squeeze me through and know it could be a separate source. what, what would the running a single shortly with a gun different stress, one pin, we're particularly to my hold on visionaire. so sort of go through. so let's do it with you on there. but if it was them, you know, it seems like what chapter of a credit given is spent on know doing it. we're on opposed to the best number to get you through and then sort of compare th

robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer spoke of hale doctor the rephrase sprang to mind in 1945. just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon tested new mexico team, the team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget to build 3 atomic bombs, giving the us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2. the found that it goes to serious damage across the yeah, definitely. but i'm really at a slow and then uh and what was that? he missed which one this is sort of, you know, still good though. let me skip this shortly. and this is a for sure appointment to store item those are you mean it's lovely store, matthew, it'll still have to be made to of a horse squeeze me through or no, it could be a separate source. what would the do? i knew a single shortly or a gun. if i stress my pin, we're putting any up in there. hold on visionaire. so sort of go on the scale. what you on the yeah. i don't know what's them, you know, as soon as i can reach out to a credit union has spent, i know they're doing it, we're on the police, did anyone know dismembered to go

the destroyer of wells, robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer, spoke of how document rephrase frank, combined in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico. he lived a team of scientists for 3 years, with a $2000000000.00 budget. to build 3 atomic bombs, giving us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2. the victor. so serious damage across the yeah. just really, really a, a small and then uh and what was he missed? which one in the city. so thought he was going to do all of these skills shortly, and this is a for sure appointment to store at them socially. me. it's lovely. spoke to matthew little stephanie made it to a horse squeeze me through and it could be a separate source. what would the one in a single shortly or a gun isn't stressed one? can we predict any other man? hold on for sure. there's a sort of go on the scale. what you on the yeah. i don't know. what's them, you know, things are going to chat. the credit union has spent the day and yet we're on a place to their new we're a little bit longer to get you throu

robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer, spoke of hale doctor the rephrase sprang to mind in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico. team of scientists for 3 years, with a $2000000000.00 budget. to build 3 atomic bombs, giving the us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2, the found that it goes to serious damage across the yeah, definitely. but i'm really at a slow and then uh and what was he missed? which one? and this is what the deal is going to do. let me skip what's shown here. and this is a for sure appointment to store out them. fortunately. mean it's lovely, spoke to matthew little scott, to be made to a horse squeeze me through and know it could be a separate source. what were the gardening a single shortly with a gun isn't stressed. one pin we're particularly in there. hold on fishing there. so sort of go on the scale, what you on the yeah. but if it was them, you know, it seems check what a chapter about a credit union has spent, i know they didn't yet were on the police, did anyone on the business or do you thr

robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer, spoke of how that very phrase sprang to mind in 1945, just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon test in new mexico. he lived a team of scientists for 3 years, with a $2000000000.00 budget. to build 3 atomic bombs, giving us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2, the, the cost of serious damage across the yeah. just really, really a, a small and then uh and what was he missed? which one in the city. so thought he was going to do, let me see it was showing a nest that is a for sure appointment to store at them. those are, you may as lovely store your door still have to be made to a horse squeeze me through or no, it could be a separate source. what were the driving a single shortly, or a gun isn't stressed, money spent, or we're particularly in there. hold on fishing there. so sort of go on the scale of what you on the yeah. but okay, what's them, you know, as soon as check on a chapter about a credit when it has spent, i know they didn't yet we're on a posted anywhere on the best number to ok. and you throw

, the american physicist oppenheimer spoke of hale doctor the rephrase sprang to mind in 1945. just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon tested new mexico. team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget to build 3 atomic bombs, giving the us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2. the found that it was to serious damage across the yeah, definitely. but i'm willing to a small and then uh doesn't was he missed which one in the city so that he was going to do all of these skills shortly. and this is a for sure play with the store of them socially. i mean, it's lovely. spoke to matthew through slots in the media to of, of what scares me. throwing up there could be a separate source. what were the learning a single shortly with a gun different stress, money spent, or we're particularly up in there, hold on a fishing there. so sort of go on the scale, what you on the yeah, but don't know what's them you know, things are going to chapter with a credit union has spent on what you're doing it. we're on a posted anywhere on the best number to get you th

robert oppenheimer, the american physicist oppenheimer, spoke of how that very phrase sprang to mind in 1945. just after the 1st successful nuclear weapon tested new mexico team, the team of scientists for 3 years with a $2000000000.00 budget. to build 3 atomic bombs, giving the us incredible military superiority at the end of world war 2, the victor. so serious damage across the yeah. generally, but i'm really a, a small and doesn't was he missed which ones in the city so that he was going to do all of these skills shortly. and this is a for sure appointment to store at them socially. mean it's lovely. spoke to me if you throw stuff in the media to avoid, squeeze me through and it could be me a separate source. what were the learning a single shortly or got an instruction on pennsylvania particularly in there? hold on for sure. there is a sort of the scale of what you on the yeah for the most of them, you know, as soon as i can reach out to a credit union has spent, i don't know what they're doing yet. we're on the police. did anyone know dismembered to over to you through and then

we asked the creators of both oppenheimer and the wonderful story of henry sugar if they would like toponded. another painting from the zaks collection, attributed to the ukrainian artist alexandra exter, is in the cleveland museum of art. its curators expressed interest in the results of our investigation, but declined to comment. we have found out that one more zaks collection painting is in the possession of the albertina museum in vienna. called genoa, it was also attributed to exter. the museum has told us that they conducted their own analysis. the painting is not on display. this brings us to the last step in proving if a painting is real — expert opinion. the bbc has obtained records showing that both museum curators and art experts helped mr zaks promote his collection. we tried to track some of them down. he laughs sarcastically the bbc has tried to interview mrs railing. she agreed to meet me at the pub and she allowed me to record our conversation. i see. we found that many articles from the incorm members substituted provenance paperwork in the catalogues of the galerie or

matter, quite recently. it so happened, i was somehow talking about why the oscar was given to oppenheimert this film, because in my opinion the film is absolutely cardboard, so there are different i listened to all sorts of versions, tried to stage some of my own, but here, by all accounts, there is still some kind of truth in the fact that the film, of course, is not about any kind of nuclear weapons, nor about benheimer, nor obnstein, nor about fear and the horror of the nuclear apocalypse, so to speak, and of course that there is some kind of sacred connection, here we are, the us party, and the western intelligentsia . here is some kind of super-knowledge of superpower in the form of nuclear weapons, hence this constant admiration, this is a demonstration of this nuclear explosion, this is about how exactly scientists collect these bombs, they send them, some kind of thing like this, in this sense, the united states, it seems to me, has nuclear weapons, in this ideological sense, such a very interesting connection, they are the only ones who used them, i would really like it this is e

we've seen a lot of people moving up like socgen and oppenheimer.hey were the highest on wall street. we've seen other firms like goldman sachs and bank of america in tandem revising their outlooks for the index. there is a concern that people have gotten on the same side of the boat. if you look at these targets, they are not implying much upside from here so it's not like everyone is predicting gains of 10-20%. sentiment apparently has not reached euphoria just yet. katie: it's only just april 1 and there is a lot of daylight left this year. thank you so much. let's run the conversation out with martin norton, the morningstar chief investment officer. let me pick up on the valuation talk. it seems that everyone agrees things look a little pricey when you look at the broad indexes but some disagreement over what that means. should we be worried about it? >> i still think there is dispersion and valuation. the point that it's been a long rally that's been pretty strong equity returns for the course of 2023 and in the first quarter. a lot of 2023 was

did you guys see oppenheimer? yeah. okay. you've got great scientists. they're doing valuable, dangerous work. and, you know, it's like great band. it's like the beatles. why should they break up some people thought that about oppenheimer's team? and so in the early fifties they were brought together under title jason and, they were going to be used by both the white house and by the military to examine problem scientifically and. so they are taking extremely. and in the spring of 1979, we had an environmental conscious president. they had been looking at the climate issue. i think for a year and the leader of their study said this is going to happen. we've been talking about it since 1895. we've been talking it publicly since 1956. we've looked at it and the quote in the times wasn't subtle. it was, this is going to go out of control unless mitigating actions are taken. and the jasons saying that means something to the white house. so they went to the national academy of sciences. you guys know what that is? okay. who started it? you guys are so clever.

and people like oppenheimer decided to speak out. this is really great. the i think if you look at some of my congressional testimony, you'll notice that i got it just about right. i would predict that we would see the effects of climate change relatively near in the future, perhaps in a couple of decades. i was very clear when i spoke to senator, is this going to be big problems unless we start cutting emissions that the moving the politics of climate change is a huge task. because you have an enormous portion of the economy that is dependent on the use of fossil fuels. so all those interest created a fictional story about the issue in order to diminish any political chance of action that didn't one. 6 the average person to know what the truth was in that climate change of the exxon is now and why other than one of the largest oil producing companies in the world. we know that exxon scientists in the 1980s were fully aware of the gravity of the problem. their predictions were very good, very accurate. it was very well understood that c o 2 had a major ro

it's made about 32 euros million at the cinema, beating both barbie and oppenheimer. and white, and it's about a housewife and mother living in rome in 1946, which is when italy was just recovering after world war two. now, the director also plays the main character. and this is a woman. this is a woman who in the movie suffers violent, emotional and physical abuse by her husband. and her story resonated with people across italy, especially women. and to understand why, let's look at some figures. in italy, 120 women were murdered in 2023. now, that's about one woman killed every three days. and more than half of them were killed by partners or ex—partners, and a quarter were killed by their children, mostly men. now, sadly, this is nothing new in italy, but a few months ago, the issue of femicide erupted because of this woman. julia was 22 and she was allegedly murdered by her ex—boyfriend just a few days before she was able to graduate from university. now, her killing triggered mass protests across the country. it really felt like a turning point in italian society

but also, let's get some context of people lost their collective poop about barbie and oppenheimer.ently. this is the bad time to say, you know, films really ain't swinging. although i do think out of those two films because of all the plastic barbie will eventually end up killing more people than the atomic bomb. yeah, certainly more turtles. yeah, it's a wind and he said in an interview, you're right. so he's plugging a film saying films aren't as good as they used to be, and also goes on to say it's because we've got all the tv, there's too much tv, all the streaming things. where's this film? it's on netflix . so he literally on netflix. so he literally moans about films while releasing a film, moans about streaming . streaming. >> well, i guess he's self—aware, isn't he? >> at least that's he's the gift of not needing the money. yeah, he can go on and do. film is released is a thing about the invention of pop tarts or something, isn't it? >> it's a very sort of, schlocky. >> also probably will go on to kill more people than the atomic bomb. so out of all of these three, oppenhe

and then this leading at all. incidentally, i think the oppenheimer of feeling makers might say, i want to read another history book or 2 as well, but that's a whole different story.

would be no tolerance of this kind of lie and then misleading at all. incidentally, i think the oppenheimer of feeling makers might say, i want to read another history book or 2 as well. but that's a whole different story at peter cuz nick, director of the nuclear studies institute at the american university in washington dc. we thank you very much for your time. thank. you. know i, these really parliament has passed the so called out, which is 0 or giving the government temporary powers to prevent for and use networks from operating in israel. prime minister netanyahu say's he will bomb the channel because it's helping from us algae 0 harmed is real security actively participated in the october 7 massacre and incited against idea of soldiers. it is time to remove the trumpet of hum us from our country. alj a 0 will no longer broadcast from is real. i intend to take immediate action in accordance with the new law to stop the operation of the channel. what could tardy political level as doctor ali? oh, how you will say spinning and destiny all who is specifically tar thing out you see are in

we had the academy award with oppenheimer, we're be actually kind of condition or either habituated to the notion of nuclear war as though it's not anything to worry about. and i must say that i am a little that i'm quite weren't quite reluctant to use the word races. but recently i got to tell you i, i saw an interview with jose andrews from world central kitchen. and martha raddatz and whenever she spoke of, it is really debts. they were humans and it was data was really easy to use a desk and it was humans. and that was great. whenever you talked about a palace, any of it was always numbers and numbers are going up. is like when we take these like socrates and collateral damage, well you know what i lied or you're, you're absolutely right. i mean it, i saw that interview too. and you know, people were killed in gods, but they never say who killed them or why they were killed. keep going, right, right. is just inadvertently. and what's happening is, i always think about the bigger picture and i get, i only speak from the 1st for the rest of the world is far more aware. but we're bein