i had more confidence had the opr been involved? ., involved? i believe so, and what must be really _ involved? i believe so, and what must be really frustrating - involved? i believe so, and what must be really frustrating for - involved? i believe so, and what must be really frustrating for liz j must be really frustrating for liz truss right now and her van chancellor is they will never be able to replay history. they will never be able to unveil the same package of tax cuts with the office for budget responsibility, but you mentioned can be brought into the tent, allowed to model this with the bank of england kept inside and it and briefed against by the trust company throughout last summer. and also the chief civil servant in the treasury, time scholar, was sacked, spectacularly sacked by the incoming chancellor. and all of this was absorbed by financial markets, and therefore, i believe it undermines therefore, i believe it undermines the overall message. the underlying principle of trying to make the uk economy and more dynam

yvonne: opr remains unchanged as we mentioned. -- lpr. we could still see some cut but maybe not today. they are seeing it is apposite right now on the policy support site and we are watching some of these -- from munich and antony blinken as well. it has been a mixed picture across the board but mostly higher. rishaad: antony blinken also discussing all this with the asia government correspondent. let's start off with this encounter in munich. what it was between the two of them. this one was quite aggressive afterwards. >> we did see quite a bit of finger pointing at one another both on the part of antony blinken and china's top diplomats. some of that revolved around the balloon incident. one called it hysterical, almost incomprehensible. antony blinken alleging it has intelligence for china to resume and send assistance as well. yvonne: he mentioned more about that in the interview. let's sense a little bit of the tone from >> both sides. >>i made very clear to him that china sending a surveillance balloon in violation of internationa

opr (cecily) what's up, einstein? (einstein) my network went into a black hole! i paid for. not so smart. (cecily) nah, you're still a genius. but, there is a smarter way to save. (einstein) oh?! (cecily) switch to verizon! and get a new iphone 14 pro and apple watch, on them. (vo) yep. right now get iphone 14 pro and apple watch se, on us. that's a value of up to $1200. (einstein) eureka! i'm switching! (cecily) wow. you're pretty spry. (vo) the network you deserve. the savings you want. verizon think he's posting about all that ancient roman coinage? no. he's making real-time money moves with merrill. so no matter what the market's doing, he's ready. and that's... how you collect coins. your money never stops working for you with merrill, a bank of america company. i've got moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. now, there's skyrizi. ♪things are getting clearer.♪ ♪i feel free to bare my skin yeah, that's all me♪ ♪nothing and me go hand in hand♪ ♪nothing on my skin♪ ♪that's my new plan♪ ♪nothing is everything♪ achieve clearer skin with skyrizi. 3 out of 4 people a

i wonder why it got almost n opres s press coverage or pastor. >> i don't know. a littlei' worried.ow you you got this this whole choir here. i'll tell you what i think you've got to go.o i won't go int o that right.nyway. when i first got to thwhe senate ,it was in the days when the there were some very strong segregationists from james alwaysong fauci. s in you know, strom thurmond lovingm our neighbors is alsano part of the essence of the american promise, a promiseghbors i thats as the new congress that is more diverse and moress thatd different and worship more religions, more races, more , more , more diversity. >> more races. laura hornsey talking about how he also admitted his good gd sersonal pal, robert byrd, the senator from virginia, who was the grand cyclop s ofmaybe the . so maybe he would be encouragedt to know that there t are more racists in the congress. but what a bizarre event, i have to say. yeah, that'ssa right hand . wie grand wizard, we're pals. the president's main point,za though, was to pray fo r what was a unity, i think. s unity. righ

corporations tax the opr in march 2021 said 39.5 corporations tax the opr in march 2021 said 39. 5 £40n tax. it turned out to be 62.6 billion. they're making a forecast in march for the april to the april that's follows i mean immediate forecasts this is not long—range forecasting that's 58% miss and here's the big one the third one. yeah, the third one on the right there of the screen for tv viewers, the overall said in march 2021 the government would borrow to hundred and 33, march 2021 the government would borrow to hundred and 33 , £234 borrow to hundred and 33, £234 billion. turned out to be 125 billion. it turned out to be 125 billion. it turned out to be 125 billion. in other words , the billion. in other words, the borrowing prognosis that , the borrowing prognosis that, the obe are put forward was borrowing prognosis that, the obe are put forward wa s £108 obe are put forward was £108 billion out. it was wildly over gloomy. and that's what frightened the horses and that's what did or did for kwasi kwarteng in was she right to hang him out to dry on on this make him take the bl

, which responsibility, the opr, which was set up by cameron and osborne years almost act as osborneact as an impartial third party to view government forecasts , budgetary government forecasts, budgetary forecasts. and so think her point was that the opi are just put. i think she used the word so. so they they castigated, they criticised this and then they criticised this and then the markets reacted. it wasn't other way round. my understanding she also said in the article the all tends to undervalue the benefit of low taxes and supply side reforms for economic growth and the benefits of public spending . so benefits of public spending. so that's why. so in their minds it seems that they inevitably that puts a lot of pressure and puts tax up well so higher tax higher spend. but what we're doing we want to repeating about who actually in charge is it the tail wagging the dog is the dog wagging the tail because are civil and this is civil servants and this is against the thrust of her that civil servants. well, civil servants mandarins that all they see every colour are every hue of g

expand this into all of america and i was told why lbq all of it all of it young people young people oprs exactly printed all legalize all of it. you mean the maryland juana drugs prostitution you name it everything that's bad. they're trying to legalize here, and we're trying to tell people stop. stop we are all american. we are protected. we protect ourselves number one, but the constitution's designed to tell us how the law is supposed to help us protect ourselves. we are americans lgbtq black white. asian. there's a way to live. we don't have to all agree. but i have told my children my wife and i have never seen my wife my children to be be rude or crude to anybody if that's all lgbtq person being mistreated about somebody i'm stepping to their aid. leave that person alone. i'm gonna write to me mean in that person be disrespectful to that person. there's no virtue armstrong and us being what they say. you know christianity non-violence is a christian virtue. it is not non-aggression is a christian virtue. so what you say is what this is what happens? when government tries to replace

to talk to the bank of england and the opr. sacked the treasury permanent secretary before she had barely a feet in office and she couldn't communicate and act like a prime minister. i mean, liz truss is not a victim here. she wasn't right for the job and there are hundreds of thousands of us still living with the consequences of her thankfully brief reign . you say about the brief reign. you say about the forecasts and stuff, she says. i'm direct, quoting here. it's also worth recalling that no obe our forecast is accompanied many other fiscal announcements , not other fiscal announcements, not least the covid 19 furloughs scheme, which cost 70 billion. well we know it cost that that number of billions because lizzie the government that she was a key member of in cabinet wasted billions of it. and we're going to see what come out in the public. she's on this game as we go on about why the double standards what she's saying is how come everyone was cool with huge policy announcements such as the 70 billion or whatever it was go

oprs presentation about the role tt neutrality plays in the analysis and are stance is it's a big part of the antiterrorism analysis because a person is much more likely to be liable for aiding and abetting if it is giving special treatment to the primary wronoi. if it is in fact the case that youtubes plying neutral algorithms is simply showing more isis videos to people who have shown an interest in isis ju as it does more cap videos to those who have shown an interest in cats, it lely to give rise to liability -- >> likely based on what. you seem to be putting a lot of stock on the liability piece of this rather than as justice jason was saying the immunity piece. if we go dn is road, about sure that's going to pan out as justice kagan says, laui will be nonstop. by defamatory material which there's a lot of that is out there and finds its way onto the website that hosts thirdar conduct. there will be lots of little. -- lots of lawsuits. mr. stewart: there are a lot o things to sue about, but they wod not be suits that would have much likelihood of prevailing especially if the court

and ethical problems, misconduct that falls short of law breaking, generally is more in the opr thanucratic entities here. >> director brennan, i think i asked this question every day for four years. why do they do it? and i have that question about john durham, who before taking on donald trump's pet investigation, the investigators had a decent reputation. one of the it was attorneys quoted in the story says everything about that reputation rang hollow when he was face to face with mr. durham in the conduct of his work on the probe. the other thing that i remember is horowitz looked at some of this and durham allowed for a statement to go out for this investigation contradicting the doj. i wonder if you think there's a higher place at which to examine the conduct of this four-yearlong investigation into the investigators. >> well, clearly, this whole investigation was politically motivated. i think it was quite clear that engaged in a fair amount of unethical and professional inappropriate activities throughout as bulls barr was kowtowing to donald trump. therefore, bill barr put t

service, whitehall , are stacked against whitehall, are stacked against low tax conservatives and the oprfor example, which is needed to make any financial decisions. and most most decisions are laid out with an able forecaster and it's stacked against and it, it overestimates the value of high spending and underwrites underestimates the value of high taxes, which is a structural problem in the economy. she also points to the fact that these these pension funds , ldi, as these pension funds, ldi, as they're called, were huge , they're called, were huge, highly leveraged . and 60% of the highly leveraged. and 60% of the whole of the gdp were in these pension funds, which meant that there was basically a tinderbox, she calls it, under the uk economy, ready to at any economy, ready to explode at any time. acknowledges she time. she acknowledges that she was realise that was naive not to realise that and sort of play along and not to sort of play along with rules others have in with the rules as others have in the past. but she that the the past. but she felt that the situation was so urgent