terms of history, because this board back in the '80s, every meeting there would be a suspension or a revocation case related to a massage establishment? >> when was this. in the '80s and mimes more sometimes more than one. i don't know if the numbers has gone down or they are obeying the law more. >> you did your job in the '80s. >> the question here, i don't think there has been a lot of dispute over the incidents. there is probably some dispute over the exact happenstance over the more serious incident and therefore, i accept that there has been a number of issues here that warrant some level of penalty. the contrary side to that is the fact that there were some due process issues. one in terms of the 20 days. and i was also not overly impressed by the nature of the hearing process that i read in the transcript. it was not very well-done and i didn't think it was just an issue of language, but what i read into statements. how people were directed. how they were allowed -- and i didn't find it very appropriate to a city agency in terms of how we deal with our citizens, no matter how guilty the

or b-6. and subsection c continues, "that nothing about the state regulatory section shall preclude a local ordinance from authorizing suspension, revocation or other restriction of a license or performance for violation of this chapter or of the local ordinance that occurred at the business premise." i don't think it's the case that ceo can evade the pen penalties that happened in july before they came within the ambit of the state statute. even if you set aside the facts and you sets aside the law, that argument is curious, because it would be the only law i'm aware of which you can say i can commit a wrong, but i can't be penalized because six months later i moved out of your jurisdiction and therefore, it doesn't count that i committed a violation in the first place. that is just a very strange argument. and i think we can leave it at thatment if you have questions, in particular the most serious question raised the 12-day notice received despite 20-day notice requirement. dph acknowledges that was an error, but the case law is clear that the error was cured by the appellant's appearance at the hearing. and even if it weren't already o

deemed accepted when filed with the board, superintendent or human resources department, except that if the teacher files a written revocation of his or her offer of resignation within three district working days, after its filing, shall be deemed -- it shall be deemed revoked. the board of education shall fix the effective date of the resignation no later than june 30th of the school year in which the residence nation was offered. district shall make good-faith effort to notify the uniton within 24 hours of the teacher's written offer of resignation, unless the teacher affirmatively requests confidentiality. and mr. kelly is correct that we did not appropriately notice the union. we have as a matter of practice, we have a lot of resignations throughout the year, and have not historically noticed the union. i did not know there was a requirement. my bad that we noticed the union, but certainly our attorney's opinion is that doesn't affect the fact that an adult teacher made an adult decision to resign. and there was no indication that -- and a -- in good faith based on the resignation, we hired another teacher and placed tha

you should do it via a living revocable trust, and within that trust, you should say they don't get to spend this money till they're 30 or 40 or whatever it may be for their circumstances, but just to give it to them, are you kidding me? now you know. okay, until next week, there's only one thing that i want you to remember when it comes to your money, and it's this, people first, then money, then things. it's killing me, people. it's killing me. but now you stay safe. bye-bye. >>> this is "options action." tonight, bad dreams. boeing shares fall of tech glitches. but cohen carter says buy now and they're teaming up for a trade that can pay you long shares for the batters aerospace giants. we'll break it down. >>> plus, house of pain? morgan stanley and jpmorgan fall ahead of next woke's earnings. should you be concerned? dan nathan will have the answers. and well liked, facebook shares have surged 17% in 2013, and do you see more upside? scott nations gets social. the action begins right now. >>> from the heart of new york times square, i'm melissa lee, these are the traders. and the rally is showing signs of fatigue wi

or notification"y!,vñ from the department of public health, we hold as1( sñ correct. so ins:÷s case, iy/jpttj!@v without additional information0(c÷uzmn either suspension orc:::1 revocations permits issued by the policeubfjÑ department. the police =i department tooky positionk$ food of like food ofou%($ that2u9k,>s the restriction was you can't be within'y((!x)i 600 feet which is what th+ stated. legislation under mobile food facilities permit]71!?:ñ changed that legislation to say we will consider like foods. and itf?&;hbñ is weightedizc pzw zeh to ensure that it is fair andr>b-"$mj4qr uniform, in this case, this what the department did not only the legislation but the p director's ord'g8 k d evaluation. >> vice president fung:4mklp mk lky thejn« d ifx)( bwc there it looks like both sides of the street are+z being reconstructed in to7#::7cg8biysnr >>jpz according to the codea#nnnf and what been, if there's af>k sitej&( éj andw,,<;ñ the applicant)x nuo needs to0ú move we will work with the applicant alternative location. however atd the constrg=) back to the original location. >> vice president fung:5,b6the second question is -- don't recall usmq!tpt discussing it iny2ÑÑ

revocable trust with an incapacity clause in it will do that for you. so if you are out there and you're thinking about coming on the how am i doing segment or you're wondering how are you doing when it comes to your finances, if you do not have a living revokable trust, you aren't doing very well at all. do you hear me? you best get yourself one. now you know. until next week, there's really only one thing i remember you to remember when it comes to your money and it's this -- people first, then money, then things. now you stay safe. bye-bye. >> this is "options action." tonight, take a bite. apple shares have been rotten but can earnings right the stock? he's got a trade that can make seven times your money in one week. he'll show you how. >>> hang up on nokia, shares of the cell phone maker have been on fire. a flashing warning sign. we'll tell you what it is and how you can make money. >>> and why are all those traders betting on jetblue calls. the action begins right now. in the heart of the new york's times square, if you vice president checked your portfolio, do it now. strong earnings pushed the dow and s&p 500 to five-year highs. will the good times

they did not know and we do not know if it will work or not but i imagine the risks if they are wrong. 6 million jews dead, the is revocation of israel. -- the eradication of israel. hyper proliferation in the middle east and the iranian domination of the middle east and oil economy of the world. do any of you want to live with that? thank you very much. [applause] >> ladies and gentlemen, it is clear why people have called this debate one of the toughest global for policy changes -- challenges of a generation. we have had to sharply contrasting arguments, and luckily presented by these teams of debaters. big round of applause for all of them. let me reiterate something. it is one thing to give a set piece speech on the subject you're intimately familiar with. quite something different to come in front of an informed audience and to make your case with passion and conviction. a question in front of all of us is which of these two teams of debaters has been able to sway public opinion in this hall. i'm glad i did not have a ballot. before we make that second vote, let's remember where public opinion was act in this hall at t

they did not know and we do not know if it will work or not but i imagine the risks if they are wrong. 6 million jews dead, the is revocationisrael. hyper proliferation in the middle east and the iranian domination of the middle east and oil economy of the world. do any of you want to live with that? thank you very much. [applause] >> ladies and gentlemen, it is clear why people have called this debate one of the toughest global for policy changes -- challenges of a generation. we have had to sharply contrasting arguments, and luckily presented by these teams of the bidders. big round of applause for all of them. -- teams of debaters. big amount of applause for all of them. let me reiterate something. it is one thing to give a set piece speech on the subject you're intimately familiar with. quite something different to come in front of an informed audience and to make your case with passion and conviction. a question in front of all of us is which of these two teams of debaters has been able to sway public opinion in this hall. i'm glad i did not have a ballot? . before we make that second vote, let's remember where public

they did not know and we do not know if it will work or not but i imagine the risks if they are wrong. 6 million jews dead, the is revocation of israel. hyper proliferation in the middle east and the iranian domination of the middle east and oil economy of the world. do any of you want to live with that? thank you very much. [applause] >> ladies and gentlemen, it is clear why people have called this debate one of the toughest global for policy changes -- challenges of a generation. we have had to sharply contrasting arguments, and luckily presented by these teams of debaters. big round of applause for all of them. let me reiterate something. it is one thing to give a set piece speech on the subject you're intimately familiar with. quite something different to come in front of an informed audience and to make your case with passion and conviction. a question in front of all of us is which of these two teams of debaters has been able to sway public opinion in this hall. i'm glad i did not have a ballot. before we make that second vote, let's remember where public opinion was act in this hall at the commencement of tonight's d

demonstrate any cases or kpap peltz where the consequence of foreign offices review of export policy transfers authority to a regime we actually -- >> we did, as the committee knows we had revocation of 158 licenses last year. that was a subject of some controversy and the committee took a different view in some respects about the lessons of that. and so, those, i suppose the more detailed, probably far more detail depends what you mean by authoritarian regime. but that was revocation of licenses to countries in the middle east and north africa and there has also been revocation of a couple in the last year to syria when the e.u.'s embargo changed, the provisions of that changed and so, i think those are advantages. >> thank you. >> mike gates. >> can you confirm in the case of an agreement between the u.k. and another government perhaps some kind of defense cooperation that doesn't have the same status as the, where we are talking about restrictions or controls on the arms exports that are purchased from british companies or exported from this country? in other words, if the mod decides to transfer equipment to another state that wouldn't be subjected to the same criteria as woul