the order was then issued. in march, the order of abatement was mailed to the bank of new york. the owner claims that mail should have gone to her and not the bank of new york. she made repairs, is that true? >> yes. the invoice and reinspection took place. it was repaired within less than 10 days. commissioner murphy: so she made the repairs as soon as she was aware of them and then mailed it to the housing inspector in july. for some reason, the inspector did not verify those repairs until october. commissioner lee: i think you just made your case that the board of abatement went to the wrong party. commissioner murphy: yes, so i see the present owner -- commissioner walker: and that is what we are looking at. i feel the same way. i feel the order of abatement went to the wrong person, and we did not know. it is not because we made an error. we relied on information in our system, but another entity in our system had not updated it to give us proper, immediate ownership. so the issue for me is a fair notice opportunity. that is what we're looking at, not the facts of anything

"which will be voted upon in the order sfed." if you could strike anything else -- >> no. >> and right now it reads the sentence reads once nominations are received, the president will bring them back to vote on the nominations which we voted on in the order received. you want to keep that language. madam clerk you're proposing we strike that? >> i'm proposing the original language number one because that's how roberts rules of order states it can be done, as with the way supervisor daly suggesting they could both be done pursuant to roberts rules but i chose the other because we had pred dense for it in our board president election where it allows supervisors more freedom to state -- to state the name of the individual they're supporting rather than the -- the voting joran or any one individual. any further discussion on that point? i don't think that was something that we -- that we focused on in the private discussion. supervisor campos. >> i think -- i think i see supervisor daly's point. i don't see the need to strike that l

if somebody lives very close to where the stay away order is and the stay away order is where he or she was doing business, there can be exceptions and conditions in this that say that this person can go to and from their house. from the bus stop to their house they can't be on the corner of 16th and mission and loitering for the purpose of selling drugs or committing what their crime was but can walk through it to go home. they can take a bus from there if they can't find a place to take a bus. it can be spelled out that specifically so as not to restrict somebody from going to and from their home. >> any other questions? that's it? >> yes. >> absolutely. because octavia boulevard. they come through our neighborhood like it's the freeway. coming to get on the freeway. they barely stop at the stop signs the turn on the relates and the kids are on the corner. they are coming on through. when we did the safe path we held up signs saying slow down. one of the thing we promote our philosophy is all the children are our responsibility. and a lot of the bus stops at the children are going to

the order -- order states as a general rule it would not satisfy no unreasonable discrimination standard because it simply is not consistent with an open internet, for broadband providers to skew the marketplace by favoring one idea or application or service over another by selectively prioritizing internet traffic. fourth, the rules recognize that broadband providers needed meaningful flexibility to manage their networks to deal with congestion, security, and other issues. and we also recognize the importance and value of business model experimentation such as tier pricing. these are practical necessities that will help promote investment in an expansion of high-speed broadband networks. so, for example, the order makes clear that broadband providers can engage in a reasonable network management providing certainty. fifth, the principle of internet openness applies to mobile broadband. there has been some confusion on this, so let me be clear -- there is one internet, and must remain an open platform, however consumers and innovators access it. today we are adopting for the first time b

once it was stripped of the roberts rules of order, outside of the outside of the roberts rules of order items, then roberts rules of order were back in. >> did you put additional things in based on roberts rules or were you removed from supervisor daley's amendments that would have required roberts rules. >> would you repeat. >> we're confused whether you added something. i think what supervisor daly requested is we start with the underline amendment yao take out amendment that is would have -- that would have required any vote threshold by the roberts rules. >> mr. president, that's what we did. that's the document. >> of any sort of incomplete document. so supervisor daly, are there things you believe in the document that the clerk provideded us that -- that we should -- >> well, i mean -- i -- i think the cloak yulism would be, we have a situation here that is a cluster mess, but with eight votes we make a good process, we don't have eight votes because we're stymied by a minority of the board that doesn't want to amend the board rules. we're left with attempting to fashion -- to fas

medvedev has all of the parlous as heroes of russia and decorated the other crew members with the order of courage today on spotlight they will tell us the dramatic story and details here on the captain of the aircraft crew and the navigator he gave you know myself and surrogate how long life. you've been in the high school it has been flying the well known route between moscow and this mall town in russia for several years but you were in one flight an unexpected electricity supply failure put everyone aboard on the edge of survival the team guided by captain you gania myself managed what seemed impossible they landed the plane on an old saw that airfield. did get a life as a navigator the ice of the whole crew no surprise then that it was he who first spotted the abandoned strip lost in the taiga. the president decorated that scene was stated words the captain became fewer of russia and the navigator a member of the one. thanks so much for coming to our program and congratulations on your well deserved awards thank you. all your friends and relatives most of us. when you were landing

you send in the order, the orders are not even seen.u only need the money the next day, when the broker gets these end says where is of the money? in this scenario, there is a lot of money there because the trader holds the london. even if there isn't money it is discover this shouldn't have happened. that is why naked access is a problem. these should be screened. >> let me go through your remedies. i am over my time. this may take a few minutes. i am happy to come back. to the remedies. whether it is plausible, implausible, possible, or at least that much, there are a number of remedies that mr. peterffy suggested. one of them is the ability to submit orders to exchanges should be restricted to brokers that are clearly members. that is one of the suggestion that you make. i wonder if anybody wants to comment on that and also on the other suggestion it relates to this, brokers who were not members of the clearing house are allowed to send orders directly to an exchange with the arrangement of a clearing member broker. auld these 5,000

the bulletin takes effect as current policy because the cements the general order while the general order is in the revision process which is now. what you see in the bulletin is current policy in regard to our apartment. >> thank you, commissioner. >> i have a few questions. the issues have come to our attention because this has been happening with some frequency where officers are in dangerous situations and they have been firing at vehicles. the general practice has been to avoid this situation, but. there's a problem with a 3,000 pound or 4,000 pound missile hurtling which no one driving. there's nothing here to be in either or situation, in that police have to give up their safety and sort of become a sacrifice. is that correct? >> that is correct. anything that has to do with the use of force and that includes firearms, will be looked at under the fourth amendment reasonableness standard. we will look at everything on it case by case basis and look at all the factors. the two nuances that i read in this bulletin become important. an officer has the right to use deadly force if his o

kerry: the senate is not in order. the presiding officer: the senate will be in order. the clerk: nomination, the judiciary, carlton w. reeves of mississippi to be united states district judge for the southern district of mississippi. the presiding officer: is there any debate? if not, the question is on the nomination. all those in favor say aye. all those opposed, no. the ayes appear to have it. the ayes have it. the nomination is confirmed. a motion to reconsider the votes on the nomination is considered made and laid on the table. the president will be immediately notified of the senate's action, and the senate shall resume legislative session. a senator: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from massachusetts. mr. kerry: i just want to clarify for a couple of colleagues of mine that are waiting on the executive session. there are just a couple of items that are going to be done quickly in legislative session by unanimous consent, and then we'll come right back to the procedure that we had talked about previously. so, mr. president, for the purposes of

inbound orders based on their arrival time. if your order arrives before mine and somebody wants to trade at that price and actively, they will give you a sell before they give me a cell. because of some technicalities associated with the order protection role -- protection role, the long-term investors who are attempting to trade, very often lose their priority to certain proprietary trading firms that have the ability to utilize a special kind of order. what happens is that price time priority is violated. you can empirically calculate what price time prairie is worth. it is worth a lot of money. -- price time priority is worth. it is worth a lot of money. there is an incentive for investors to use these techniques to put into the pockets of high frequency traders who actively use this capability. i do not think high-frequency trading firms should be faulted for using that capability because there is no intention nullity behind that. what happens is that when a long-term investor goes to take an offer and post and new bit in

own stay a an order. we worked out a plan with the neighborhood groups where when someone is picked up on a violation of a stay away order the neighborhood group would get together and write letters to the judge. and say, mr. whatever his name is, has violated the stay away order and he has been the scrounge of this neighborhood. he's here and disrupts our lives. he is affecting our safety and peace of mind and quality of life and we want the stay away order upheld. the neighborhood da receives the letters, presents them to the judge and the judge gets a different perspective on how a community feels about a specific criminal. we have been very successful in having the stay away orders upheld. okay. another part of our neighborhood assistant da program is to provide the community with information. we all had the experience we see something get arrested. someone who has been a major, major pain in the butt in our neighborhood. either they are a drug dealer or prostitute, they are a burglar. we know this pe

order. the first one is an order to require broadband providers like comcast and at&t to allow subscribers to send and receive any lawful internet traffic, to go where they want, to say what they want, to use any nonharmful online devices or applications they want to use. now, this is not bad. these principles are widely supported. i don't object. neither would probably anyone. however, these principles are already in use. we don't need a big regulatory intervention to accomplish these principles, and it is the rest of the order that is diametrically opposed to this statement of openness and freedom. it installs a government arbiter to force their idea of freedom on the users of the internet and the companies that are trying to make the internet the economic engine o america. the first provision that deals with this is that networks must be transparent. it says that networks must be transparent about how they manage their networks, i.e., decisions about engineering, routeing, degrading servi

president, the national is not in order. the senate is not in order, mr. president. the presiding officer: the senate will be in order. mr. mcconnell: mr. president? the presiding officer: the republican leader. mr. mcconnell: mr. president, could you -- the presiding officer: the senate will be in order. the senate will be in order. mr. mcconnell: mr. president, according to the strange logic of democratic leaders in congress, the best way to show middle-class americans that they care about creating jobs is to slam some of america's top job creators with a massive tax hike. today's votes were an affront to the millions of americans who are struggling to find work and a clear signal that democrats in congress still haven't gotten the message of the november elections. mr. president, the senate still is not in order. mr. baucus: the senate is not in order. the presiding officer: senators, please, the senate will be in order. the senate will be in order. mr. baucus: mr. president, the senate is still not in order, especially right down here in this part of the well. th

orders. it would be 476 times more than the stock right there for that one day in the 1 contracts in one month and that was why it took awhile to analyze the data, but we did get it and share it with the sec. in the future market places, we have a pre-trade risk management functionality. we call them safeguards. they protect against extreme movements, maximum orders, protection against stock-loss orders, and market causes, more of a time-out back to the children came. exchanges are required to have these and executing brokers also have to have pre-trade risk parameters for uses of the clearing houses for the transactions. last week, the commission put out a proposal that mandates that markets have pre-trade risks safeguards and ask the public for their views. the events of may 6th and the dodd-frank act present new challenges. i want to highlight a couple which are the new authorities given to congress to work with regards to destructive trading purses -- practices. it prohibits three specifi

robert's rules of orders does not state that nominations are automatically withdrawn. a member can decide if they chose to to withdraw their nomination. so the original language states -- supervisor avalos: no. 3? madam clerk: page two, three. -- line 3. president chiu: section d. madam clerk: i am so sorry. page three, item d3. supervisor: this is absurd. we are doing this on the fly, not knowing what we are voting on? i am not feeling good about this process at this point. president chiu: one thing that i can propose, colleagues, is that we take a quick 10 to 15 minute break that incorporates supervisor daly's amendments that do not involve changing robert's rules, unless anyone has some other suggestions? supervisor daly: this may be the first time today the i agree with supervisor -- that i agree with supervisor elsbernd. i do not think any of us thought through what type of swiss cheese process we were making, and i would ask through the chair that the board of supervisors who are holding up this process for two of you to reconsider. i think we have a process whic

, so in order to -- >> no. >> in order to provide some kind of a remedy, we'll order something else that doesn't address the problem. >> no, that's -- >> that these aim at addressing. >> no, justice, they said this would be an effective remedy. all the testimony they heard from experts from texas, from pennsylvania, from washington state, all of whom had suffered, had dealt with crowding in their prison systems had said that when you reduce the crowding, that's the critical thing to do now because unless you reduce the crowding, nothing else is going to work, and the court find that that was exactly true. nothing else over 20 years in one case in over 8 years in another case has worked, and as justice kennedy said, massive amounts of evidence show that the primary reason it didn't work is one singular word, overcrowding earnings when you reduce overcrowding, the prison can operate and provide those services that it can't provide now so that doctors have room to work which they don't have now. there will be less prisoners so officers can take them from one place to another to get treatmen

touched down from time to time and that man saw it as a point of warning to maintain the runway in order he's a real. he went on tending the runway he didn't let anyone use it for outside purposes now the mushroom hunters vehicles were allowed in nor any other heavy equipment business people that cut timber in that area for us but to china offered him good money to be permitted to stockpile timbered on the runway to earn money yes but he declined all offers he said this trip should stay free in case an aircraft game was needed again and so it was. the story of some glass of water that you used in order to better pilot your plane we were talking about vehicles but personally i heard the glass of water pail in connection with the rolls royce when you buy a rolls royce you place a glass of water inside and drive the car they deep mph over the water isn't skilled it means the assembly is good. pretty much the same with air craft. there shouldn't be any spilled water. in fact the glass of water will still standing when they landed. in fact years ago as the water. in fact we could show if we h

speaker, the house is not in order. the speaker pro tempore: how much time is the gentleman from massachusetts yielding? mr. mcgovern: 1 1/2 minutes to mr. lynch. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for a minute and a half. mr. lynch: thank you, mr. speaker. i thank the gentleman for yielding. to return to this debate -- mr. speaker, the house is not in order. the speaker pro tempore: members, let's carry our conversations off the floor. members. members, let's carry our conversations off the floor, please. the gentleman is recognized. mr. lynch: thank you, mr. speaker. just to remind members where we are in this debate, we are about to debate and take up a measure that would, number one, preserve the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of americans while we have a $1.3 trillion deficit in the current year. we would also, if this bill were to pass, create a tax exemption for estates of up to $10 million . that's for 6,600 individuals which brings to mind i'll paraphrase winston churchill who has said, it has

issa: point of order of order. the speaker pro tempore: the chair recognizes the gentleman from texas to reclaim his time. the gentleman is recognized. mr. issa: thank you. point of order, i believe that the gentleman from texas -- the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman will state his point of order. mr. issa: i believe the gentleman yielded time upon your request that he would only -- you would only consider my request to move to the business of appropriating for this coming fiscal year, this current fiscal year. that motion is still there. he yielded. i would like that motion to be heard that we suspend this and move to the business of appropriations for this fiscal year. the speaker pro tempore: the chair heard objection from the gentleman from texas. mr. issa: i hereby move not unanimous consent that we do so. i make a motion that we suspend and that we move to the business of the american people's funding for this fiscal year. the speaker pro tempore: the chair advises the gentleman that motion is not in order

as we had well indicated in last wednesday's hearing, the plan for the northern waterfront, in order to strengthen oured by to secure the rights -- our bid to secure the right to host the america's cup is substantial improvement. it has been amazing that based upon time lines that have been imposed upon us and how the city family has been able to marshall i think the resources to together in order to try to put forward the best bid we possibly could. the bid that is under consideration now on the northern waterfront is, we think we believe, the best that the city can do. and that we think by moving to the northern waterfront presents a number of advantages for both the city and the event authority. most certainly to develop facilities within the very restricted timeline that is required in order to certainly allow for the race and prepare for the race to happen as delineated in 27 and 29. the cruise terminal process which is already underway, paragraphs 30 and 32 which has substantial ceqa review because of prior projects. there is less risk to the authority, smaller investment to ac

, and house resolution 1430, if ordered. members this is a 15-minute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: 229. the nays are 177. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 229. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 232. the nays are 180. the previous question is ordered. the esti is on adoption of the resolution. so many as are in favor say aye. those opposed, no. the ayes have it. the gentleman from florida. mr. diaz-balart: we request the yeas and nays. the speaker pro tempore: the yeas and nays are requested. those favoring a vote by the yeas and nays will rise. a sufficient number having arisen, the yeas and nays are ordered. members will record their votes by electronic device. members, this is a five-minute vote.

the house will be in order. the house will be in order. for what purpose does the gentleman from wisconsin rise? mr. obey: mr. speaker, i call up joint resolution h.j.res. 101 and ask for its immediate consideration. the speaker pro tempore: the clerk will report the title of the joint retslusion. the clerk: house joint resolution 101, joint resolution making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011 and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to house resolution 1741, the gentleman from wisconsin, mr. obey, and the gentleman from california, mr. lewis, each will control 30 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from wisconsin. mr. obey: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous done sent all members may have five legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks on h.j.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. so ordered. mr. obey: mr. speaker, i yield myself two minutes. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for two minutes. mr. obey: mr. speaker, this legislation is one page long,

this is around the order. it may be about who wants to go first, who does not want to go first, but other than that, i do not see gaming at all, particularly with members sequestered, with service by lot, with 25 names in a hat. this could get real wild, and then, colleagues, jim lazarus, who was here during the proceedings in 1978, dianne feinstein, from the newspaper articles of the week, between the assassinations and the appointment of dianne feinstein as the interim mayor. lazarus nos. -- knows. elsbernd knows. colleagues, let's give ourselves a chance. president chiu: supervisor campos? supervisor campos: i actually wanted to get away from this and ask counsel, again, along the lines, it has been indicated the clerk of the board was given a very difficult task, and she has worked very hard to put together as good a proposal i think she possibly could. with the advice of counsel and everyone involved. i think we have to respect and appreciate that work, so i want to thank the clerk for doing that. a gener

or look over their shoulder and ordered to serve the country that they love -- in order to serve the country that they love. [applause] admiral mike mullen has said that our people sacrificed a lot fotheir country. including their lives. the of them should have to sacrifice their integrity as well. -- non of them should have to sacrifice their integritys well. [applause] that is why i believe it is the right thing to do for our military, that is why i believe it is the right thing to do period. many thought long and hard to reach this day. i wan to think the democrats and republicans that put conviction ahead of politics to get this done together. [applause] i want to recognize nancy pelosi. [applause] steny hoyer. [applause] and harry reid. [applause] today, we are marking an historic milestone and the most producti years in the history of congress. in no small part because of their leadership. we are very grateful for that. [applause] i want to thank joe lieberman. [applause] and susan collins. [applause] and i think carl levin is still working. [laughter] but i want to add car lev