. >> i'm a campaign organizationer at coleman advocates and i have a couple of questions about the items that appear on this and making sure that i understand this correctly. so the -- i was trying cross reference essentially this list that you provided with the available funding with the -- what you're actually flexing and it doesn't exactly correlate. i'm going to read the resource code. so i have the advanced placement fee waiver program. it doesn't have a resource code. i don't see where that is. details what is being flexed of that pot. for resource code 01200 for an amount of $885,139, i don't see where and how much you are flexing from that program. for resource code 07850 in the amount of $90,300, i also need to understand what is the flex amount from that program. for resource code 07560, i don't see details of what the flex amount for that program will be. this one is resource code 0004 for an amount of $29,414 and i believe -- -- i don't -- it is the oral health assessment program. for resource code 07900 an amount of $786,052, there is no details on how much is more flex than

they learned the entire concept of organizationization. boats would take combatants that were pounded up and down the rivers, these all became floating hospitals, something was introduced during the war. then finally the great hospitals of the civil war. by the time of the civil war, growing emphasis on maximizing the circulation of air along the desire for cleanliness, spaces and eventual lags found life in the form of these pavilion popt hospitals. that was the one that we're going to go into. this is hicks down in baltimore. plans called for multiple war branching out from a central circular building. in the best of circumstances, there might have been a river nearby so they would have bre s breezes and fresh air going through. less right angles. all to lessen the presence of dirt. when combineded with hygienic behavior such as chamber pots, drainage ditches dug from human waste, it changed the entire concept of hygiene. although the civil war did not bring about great changes in here put ticks or diagnostics, this -- none of these pavi

and private sector workers marched on madison, and the origins of the walker recall were not organizationally based, the origin. the origins were people who were in the streets of madison young people who slept in the state house who said we have a mechanism to change things we don't want to is wait until the next election. it was the people tens of thousands enraged who said we have this mechanism, we want to use it. >> larry, let me get to one of the issues that is emerging as a back story from this wisconsin battle. how much--and you represent workers in the public and private sector, so you're in a perfect position to address this. do you think walker was dividing unions by pitting public and private against each other or even pitting public and public against each other? >> i think that the right wing, if we can call them that do have, a and have had for 40 years have had a strategy to divide people in this country whether based on race whether based on faith whether based on sexual orientation and for sure their favorite is based on union and not private and public. and to scapegoat pub

then you throw in what happened in wisconsin which was certainly a battle organizationally between theearned, financially, and now it's all about the economic environment, and that's why the president's doing what he's doing today. >> and again, we're waiting for the president to come out in the press room in a few moments to make statements about the economy. chuck, we should note for our viewers right now on the west coast watching the first hour of "today," we just had a conversation with jim cramer talking about the fact that american companies are largely in a good position, but they're sitting on their hands. they're not hiring because of so much uncertainty. and his outlook was that it wasn't so much because of uncertainty over the presidential election but really about europe. what can the president do to jump start jobs absent a resolution on that situation? >> reporter: well, about the only piece of actual legislation that is sitting in washington that could create -- that could sort of kick start jobs on a small scale, if you will, is a big transportation funding bill. and b

then you throw in what happened in wisconsin which was certainly a battle organizationally between thewill, then throw in the money pa parity. it shouldn't be a surprise that mitt romney in the first month should be doing well. it came on the heels of president obama's best fund-raising month of his campaign, and yet he was still topped by mitt romney. look, the expectation, you talk to a lot of experts about this, the president probably is going to be outspent. not by a lot. money's probably not going to be the decisive factor on a presidential level, but there is parity between the two parties organizationally, we learned, financially, and now it's all about the economic environment, and that's why the president's doing what he's doing today. >> and again, we're waiting for the president to come out in the press room in a few moments to make statements about the economy. chuck, we should note for our viewers right now on the west coast watching the first hour of "today," we just had a conversation with jim cramer talking about the fact that american companies are largely in a good po

. >> isn't mitt romney representing the elite more so than community organizationer barracks obama.esentment. there is an comic reason to care. and that is, you know, you hear a lot about how we need to insent vise the job creators at the top but we need to insent vise those at the middle. median income has declined slightly over the last seven years. those people need a reason to care there is rapid increase in productivity in recent years and none of that bittered is going to the middle class. if i am a member of the middle class, i am not seeing an income gain from my productivity increase, what reason do i have other than fear of being fired. >> right. what reason do you have to pitch in, to be part of this country? i mean to care about the prosperity of the nation. >> exactly. not to mention that things like that we need to keep going, it seems to me -- i mean, i haven't -- you have written the book, but parks or schools or roads or brishz. >> right. >> that's the part of our kind of common en hair tensed. the most shock can statistic came out too late for me to dlu in the book

organizationally their structure to support that core business.k, they can buy a bunch of mobile companies. but they are still a big fat website. that's different from a mobile app. >> eric, thanks for your time. appreciate it. eric jackson of ironfire capital. >> which brings us comfortably to our new sweep stakes competition on "squawk on the street" which as you guessed resolves around facebook. where do you see the bottom for facebook shares? you have until june 12, about a week before the one-month anniversary of facebook's public debut, to send us your predictions. what is the bottom for facebook. tweet us at cnbcsquawkst with hash tag nail the number. >> cnbc embroidered peacock logo. it's quite a nice hoodie, i have to say. i wear mine to the gym. >> do you? >> yeah. >> look very comfy. >> david faber's signature on the back. >> no. maybe i should bring mine in. >> you directed me to take up the entire back, and i have. i signed it. >> team faber. we should all have those. >> if i had a team, i would do that. >> i feel like your entourage.

what we have been afraid of, organizationally and broadly, is that people will read the headline anday i guess the supreme court threw out indecently laws. they were asked to and unanimously refused. host: a, you mentioned how many cases were backlog that the fcc? guest: 1.6 million. about 9700. host: i do not need to make a spokesperson for the sec but how are these adjudicated? guest: the fcc hasn't enforcement bureau and a budget of $800 million per year. they should be able to reduce these instancy spirit is a slow process. -- they should be able to reduce these instances. it is a slow process. we have quibbled with the commission from time to time about whether or not they have to stop. that is the debt that the decision they made. another impediment is no longer there it is time to do with it. host: broadcasters get your input as to whether or not this is something that will fly in the face of these indecency complaints or will you -- guest: i am not at liberty to talk about the behind-the-scenes discussions that might happen between us and members of the entertainment industry

have organic legislation that institutionalizes what we are doing in the offshore energy arena, organizationally within department of interior. when james watts signed the secretary of order creating mms in 1981, he did it by virtue of the authority of the other continental shelf lands act and the authority of the secretary of interior. it is the same authority that i use now some 30 plus years later to reorganize the department of interior the to the bureau of the russian energy and the other component of we are doing. three years plus ago i went in front of the house energy and natural resources committee as well as the senate energy committee and said i wanted to have organic legislation for what we were doing. very simple. it could be passed to that of the house and the suspension of the rules, procedures. it could be brought to the floor of the u.s. senate. it ought to be one of those things for you could get the unanimous consent of the u.s. senate to institutionalize the organization that is needed for the united states to move forward with the safe development of offshore energy. it woul

and it's an honor to be here with the claire booth loose organization, it's one of my favorite organizationers an i urge you to join it and support it in any way you can. for the past few decades, i have studied the influence of the american -- of feminism on american culture, with a special emphasis on academic culture. today, i'm going to argue that that feminism is dysfunctional. that in my view, the noble cause of women's emancipation is being damaged by the contemporary women's movement. and in the little time that i have with you, and i'm keeping track of it, no more than 15 minutes, i will explain why i think it's doing more harm than good, but first, i just want to say a few words about my background. in the early 1990's, i was a feminist academic in good standing. my courses at clark university were cross-listed with women's studies, my philosophy courses, i was invited to view papers for feminist journals, invited to feminist conferences. paul of that changed in the mid 1990's, when i wrote a book, who stole feminism and the book was rongly feminist, but i rejected the idea that amer