. >> i don't mean to be facetious and worked as a teacher and nonprofit organizationses, both in media and out and now for a for profit company if we spent as much money and time as training teachers as i became a teacher i think my big skill coming out i went to nyu and bachelor's in elementary ed. i could thread a projector with the best of them and my career in the 70's and in the last panel "if you had all the money what would you invest in?" . i would invest in education and we're not investing in the future of the children and the in the country and the global future of our world and i agree absolutely with everything you said. we're short changing our kids and not giving teachers the resources. there is mold in the teacher's work room. if i worked in the building that many children go to school in i wouldn't go to work either and in answer to your question there is a priority here about education that's not quite right. >> and while we're earmarking money i would totally support that and i feel that we should train teachers in digital media. you can't teach cooking out a kitchen

media organizationses bring their advertisers, bring the stars to impress the advertisers.know, but it's a different way the whole thing operates. >> tom brokaw has said he doesn't like the turn with which this dinner has taken, and then i had on our good friend and your colleague cynic, dana mill bangs. here's what he recently wrote. >> lost in this cozy celebration of wealth and fame is the journalistic notion of holding the powerful to account without fear or favor. he's not the first to suggest that -- >> there's something unseemly about trying to impress each other, but have i the stars there, in places that used to be reserved for journalists, basically. there are a lot of rank-and-file journalists that can no longer go. there's the display of this that is kind of unseemly, but at the same time it's one night a year. >> it's a very fun night. >> and they always remind you the proceeds go towards scholarships. >> absolutely. >> it ghot big applause. you say one wealthy hand feeds the other in this case, which then begs the question -- who is running the show? is it hol