orh 'causee we like, and we we chging with our horns well, diyou help them up? no, ausee're bulls. you dot ha hands. so, i said, "youboy' got to give those rds back to karen." and she said "her her dead body." so, said, "that can berrand." she said, "technally she could go to e poce, beuse at was a form ofssau." yeah. yeah. , ben, just write e no saying sorry, like mrs. baong id. and i'll me17 photocopi. sue: unclean? she? ke that stupid mk of mum ems pretty fired upat t mom. yeah. i haven't seen h this angry since she loed at that e on gooe eah... d spotted ben onhe rf. yeah, well-- it youfault mummy's cros for getting drunk an kissing another woman whh wa't mummy. can weust op the-- and you broke your weing promises. d i'm pretty sure e ofhem was not ssin other women. we, kiing wasn't specifilly- e vicar's going be rious. wellno, t yet. wellyou don't know who e vir was. can nd out. karen, you've t toet ready for your ccert off you go. ther happy now? i mean, am sorry, okay?" followed by ts o exclamation mark is not the most acio of apologies. t it's good. you' goto learn that you

the bill before us fails to include any authorizations orhe costs associated with the creation of the new regulatory at dhs. this attempt to hide the cost is ssme of critical infrastructure, the promulgation of regulations and their enforcement will take a small army. finally i would like to find out what specific factors went into providing carve outs for the i.t. hardware and software manufacturers? my suspicion is this had more to do with garnering political support and legislative bullying than sound policy considerations. however, i think the fact such are included only lends credence to the notion we shouldn't be taking the regulatory approach in the first place. because of threats of the hurried process myself, a total of seven of us, high north, ranking minority, and seven committees will be introducing and are left with no choice but to introduce an alternative cyber security bill in the coming days. the fundamental difference in our alternative approach is we aim to enter into a cooperative relationship with the entire private sector through information sharing rather than a

ci wvebey ar a wers epr:t t bearr lig ur ti picnd om > in htoe e as ththhe fr annswhr ti arttin wf orheti obi tsihe ntn rm o t ngoo. reerpoon itn e bees tineo f coy o inth ghth arerevheno nln gnmbuso helid ti p. iey sheelnt ou ink ry whaan yy g tam iro hseu i siod atheil be emiveend taigg o ugg o w i t furnt reerckthad wanunn ky volln tig anenerivat fideat tante ca bonerco e oriwie rsepdeinif cest sic ctoma htoy. >>dr asau wh 6asn th mp t s t keord erto ete . neu seslho f esm ppio lybu netokixas ci aisd s do crs erorreroio turfoteio rti n: tirim desabdeav gare badt massasia maetnes s. wr: yafth yrupnganol coue r thamr o y om edr dig ug re h gre exio ew, lsus a artr kng ienoofa in e s'sgeit unki trmlo idownffir ieisk, ner w sebl he miryavdeye buinndic- atinerofel fe lopoepr s y wisee tihen rd s t bonom tuy. >> cwata ngn fida e aallshhe sn of t y binlyni t any s m aaducro sear tit gahee any c ay thda oser wutth ae d rtat e woiouo ouchin sho o th wd . er tayn. oyi n un sn idba a haccd x-t e cng asee t wrafrhe ti aysaldiaat vi: syws nfoo e n'ssa es sthbeusas eirrt . hies casdef e le inhd fh

we look at these ads, someone made the statement earlier that it's not really our role to question, orhe role to question whether there was any truthfulness to these ads and that's one of the things that bothers us is -- it's fine to be negative, but you need to know, when you watch that ad, is there anything underlying it? and often, there isn't. that really distresses us, because the ads are so much, especially now, therey are so mh slicker and impressive. when weer with on fox news last week, they showed some ads and had us kind of critique them and the one that stuck with me was, it was just, i don't know what it was about, it was really impressive, though, and i was like, against the guy when it was over because i had these great graphics and really cool music and it was really an impressive ad but i had no idea if there was any underlying documentation. what we wanted to do with the book is show people, it is still possible to try to know what the truth is. and we're not trying to be lofty and put ourselves out there as, you know, the finders of the truth. but well, that is what we