i think it suggests two things, that original lists know in their hearts originalism is fundamentally at odds with who we are as a nation. secondly, it also demonstrates originalism can be used to manipulate the particular results you want to get to and not gives the fixed meaning those who support it say it

which are the buzzwords for originalism. criticisms of the principles underlying originalism are not new. in fact, i believe some lines from chief justice john marshals' opinion in 1819 almost two centuries ago are still relevant to our discussion of the point today. he wrote that the founders must have intended our constitution to endure for ages to come. and consequently to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs. he continued to have prescribed the means by which governments should in all future time execute its powers would have been to change entirely the character of the instrument and give it the properties of a legal code. it would have been an unwise attempt to provide by immutable rule which foreseen at all must have been seen dimly and which can be best provided for as they occur. he added if we apply this principle to any powers of the government, we shall find it in its operation that we shall be compelled to discard it. do you agree with the point that justice marshall made? >> well, senator, i would

i think it suggests two things, that original lists know in their hearts originalism is fundamentally at odds with who we are as a nation. secondly, it also demonstrates originalism can be used to manipulate the particular results you want to get to and not gives the fixed meaning those who support it say it does. originalism is a doctrine of false promises and it is anithetical to the framer's vision and offers jurisprudence with fixed predictable results when its application is nebulous and variable and claims valuable neutrality when it is deployed to achieve specific results. certainly, text and history are important in constitutional interpretation. but the claim that constitutional interpretation should be controlled only by history and text was one rejected in mccullough versus maryland in 1819. we should learn that lesson. >> saturday, book tv is live in charlottesville. beginning at 10:00 a.m. eastern we begin a panel discussion on the english language, adam metcalf, author of "skied dadle to selfie and author of "going to hell in a hand basket" followed by "nuclear war" at n

that's originalism. in other words, whether words and phrases in the constitution should be interpreted according to their original public meaning or how the founders and their contemporaries would have understood them. regardless of whether you characterize yourself as an originalist you have applied originalism in several decisions including last year where in a separate concurring opinion you stribd the constitution as a, quote carefully crafted text judges are charged with applying according to its original public meaning, which are the buzz words for originalism. criticisms of the principles underlying originalismr not new. in fact i believe some lines from chief justice john marshal's opinion in 1819, let me two centuries ago are still relevant to our discussion of the upon today. he wrote that the founders must have intended our constitution to endure for ages to come, and subsequently to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs. he continued, to have prescribed the means by which governm

v virginia consistent with the original public meaning? >> and the ma voijority in thate argued it was, the majority used equal protection of the laws, whatever the secret intention harbored writers is quite radical and significant and that was with the majority of the united states supreme court. >> would you be willing to apply the same approach for lgbt, transgender people, racial minorities, same approach when you made the statement about the he and his in the constitution, about not having the air force, about the virginia military decision? >> senator, a good judge applies the law without respect to persons. that's part of my judicial oath. >> so do you see it as your textualism, would you-p apply i to these as well. >> senator, what i'm trying to say is everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. >> i'm just trying to figure out this, because i think for some things a lots of people who subscribe to this theory they say we can have originalism for some cases but not others and seems to me when you look at some opinions that use origin

that's originalism. in other words, whether words and phrases in the constitution should be interpreted according to their original public meeting or how the founders and their contemporaries would have understood them. regardless of whether you characterize yourself as an originalist, you applied originalism in several decisions, including in cadova v. copy of albuquerque. you said judges are charged with applying according to its original public meaning, which are the buzz words forage naturalism. criticisms of the principles underlying originalism are not new. in fact, i believe some lines in mccullockv. maryland are still relevant towards the discussion today. he said that the constitution should endure for ages to come and be adapted to the various crises of human affairs. he continued. to have prescribed the means by which government should and all future time execute its powers would have been to change entirely the character of the instrument and give at this time properties of a legal code. it w

that is the original property. once wilmington became more prominent, obviously the quarter is still the busiest ntersection of town. it became really important to have a townhouse here in wilmington, and the jail is relocated up the street on the utskirts of town, and this house incorporates the walls of the jail as its foundation. >> welcome. you are in the center of wilmington on the corner of third and market on the original property of the city jail of wilmington from 1744 to 1768. this property and the stone building you see behind were part of the city jail compound. the house that it's built on top of the jail was built in 1770 by a man that uses the wall of the jail as the foundation for the house. the river was a lot closer, that's why we have a front street and a water street, which continuously floods today. it goes as far as 2nd street during high tide. t was really important for him to elevate his house and keep it protected when the floods came through or there was a lot of rain or hurricanes. that m

also missing was the original reference to the 911 terrorist attacks. originally there was a highlight at the very beginning that this is necessary in part because of september 11th. we all tragically remember what happened and those individuals were by in large legal visa holders, some overstays but not refugees and not from the seven countries which was one of the chief criticisms initially of, whoa, you said this was to prevent this kind of thing. but you're comparing apples to oranges in populations. these are not the right people. these are not the droids you are looking for to be very geeky about it. >> our next call is cor rene. >> caller: thank you for taking my call. can you hear me? >> go ahead. we can hear you. >> caller: today, i'm so disappointed, so disappointed at mr. president. this travel ban i don't think have anything to do with stopping terrorist with entering united states because none of the six state residents never committed any act of terror in u.s. soil. i am no longer able to travel to the united states. but i'm worried about

meanwhile, blue origin has seen a lot of action.nder jeff bezos tweeted out pictures of the engine of the rocket. one day later, he is announcing the first paying customer. blue origin has signed a satellite operator as its first client, as the company prepares to launch more powerful rockets in the next decade. partnership ate the satellite conference in washington, and invited the ceo on stage. >> a few months ago, we started approaching customers. he was very interested and right away it was a great partnership. they have done so many new vehicles in the past. we couldn't hope for a better first partner, because they will be able to help. caroline: joining us now from washington is bloomberg's reporter, who was at the conference. can you tell us, a paying customer, how important is this? >> it is a huge step for blue origin as a company. this is a space exploration company that has lived on jeff and now they have revenue in the forms of a paying customer. it is notable this was made at satellite 2017.this is the satellite industr

gangster original gangster o g original gangster o g original gangster hey ♪ ♪ make some noise o g originalisco i liked how that was ♪ ♪ goin' down dreamt about rep the mic with my own sound so i tried to write rhymes somethin' like them my ♪ ♪ boys said that ain't you ice that sounds like him so i sat back thought up a new track didn't fantasize ♪ ♪ kicked the pure fact all the suckers got scared cause they was unprepared who would tell it how it relly was ♪ ♪ who dared a young player from the west coast l.a. south central fool where the crips and the bloods play ♪ ♪ when i wrote about parties it didn't fit six in the mornin' that was the real bring it back ice ♪ o g original gangster o g original gangster o g original gangster ♪ ♪ o g original gangster 4, 3, 2, 1 when i wrote about parties someone always died when i ♪ ♪ tried to write happy yo i knew i lied cuz i lived a life of crime why play ya blind a simple look and ♪ ♪ anyone with two cents would know i'm a hardcore player from the streets rappin' bout hardcore ♪ ♪ topics over hardcore drum beats a little different than the average t

the original proclamation of life, original nations proclamation. we understand that our creator has uniquely brought forth our existence, our creation is a free and original origin grounded in love and sustained by divine instruction resulting in an existence and awareness that have materialized since time immemorial on turtle island. we understand the ideas of domination and dehumanization as these ideas are referenced within the defined instructions and warnings we have heeded since time them aware for sustained existence as original free people and nation. w.we understand that the inaccurate concept of discovery formally referred to as the doctrine of discovery utilized by the monarchies of sustain -- spain and england unjustly manifested the idea of domination and dehumanization against our original free people the nations bear witness stand the doctrine of discovery by historical monarchies was justified by an holy instruction issued by writ of papal including -- in 1452, 1455, in 1493 by and through former popes of the roman catholic church.

we're the original liberals. might a president serve such an individual, an anonymous forgotten man, by leading congress as it takes broad measures all and by saying no to lobbying groups, especially titlement groups. the president made saying no to powerful lobbyist his rule. that president was calvi calvin coolidge. it is better to kill a bad law than pass a good one, coolidge said. coolidge vetoed 50 times. today lawmakers are proud when they can increase the spending. coolidge actually cut the budget. when he left office, after 57 months, the federal budget was actually lower than when he came in. i'll let this sink in. and campaigners for coolidge knew that he stood for the original forgotten man. they said he spoke for -- another phrase you might have heard -- the silent majority. he represented the forgotten man who seeks no favors, not the preferred classes. a second aside for future cpac radio and events, if coolidge were a stock, he'd be a buy. i personally am such a huge coolidge fan that i work at his

was said to be original intent and then changed to original public meaning then changed by some to original meaning be a struabstract by technological change and then changed by other for semantic meaning that might be different from the common public understanding. nevertheless, despite their consensus on what originalism means and what theory requires, those who support the theory argue that originalism should be governing mode of constitutional interpretation. first they suggest that originalism is a written constitution an therefore consistent with the framers design. but the early courts did not see it that way. chief justice john marshal wrote in mcculloch it is intended to endure for ages to come an be adapted to the various crises of human affairs. this means the constitutional interpretation is to give meaning and substance to enduring principals over time in new context. the fact that framers did not envision this approach is also evidence in the text of the constitution which uses very broad words such as prfreedom o speech, equal protection, due process of law. those terms are n

this is what the original one looks like, this is a first edition, "on the origin of species". this one is from the natural history museum in new york because it was easier to photograph or a publishing house in new york. this is basically what it looked like. verdant green book printed by john murray, the english publisher famous in my world for also publishing herman melville's moby dick and darwin sent it to aza gray in late november of 1859, it crosses the storm tossed atlantic and arrives here, don't know the exact date but december 10th or december 15th somewhere in that time period and aza gray devours this book. he marks it up with pencil. this is why i came here, to look at this thing, he put exclamation points, underlining passages, eventually he writes yes, i agree, sometimes no, i disagree, and those are longer explanations, taking notes to provide feedback for darwin but he reads the book quickly, and fills it with notes. there is a long list of minor corrections, to darwin as he finishes the book. he begins in cambridge, he encounters, he tells charles purse, the

the text of the constitution as informed by the original understanding at the time it was adopted. do you share the view of the democratic attacks that original ism is a quaint and outdated notion for reading the constitution for what it says. judge gorsuch: senator, i appreciate the opportunity. first sometimes in our discourse today use labels as a way to not engage with other people, to treat and divide us and them. and as a judge, i just don't think that's a very fair or appropriate or useful way to engage in discourse. so i'm worried about using labels in ways that are sometimes an excuse for engagement with the ideas. sometimes perjoratively. sometimes there isn't a judge who is live who doesn't want to know something about its original meeting as enacted. and i don't think this is an ideological thing. i look at decisions like jones, which we've talked about or decisions like kylo, the thermal imaging of a home. the supreme court goes back and looks at the original history and says it is equivalent to peeping toms. the constitution is no less protected today of people's libe

step for bluee origin as a company.is a company that has lived on jeff bezos's dream, and now they have revenue in the form of a paying customer. it is notable that this announcement was made it sound like 2017. first step towards more paying clients in the future. i believe they have already been a customer of spacex. gin do space x and vir galactic compare? are seeing the continual development of new and more powerful rockets able to launch satellites to geostationary orbit. the rocket blew origin is working on, they say their launch contract is for 2021, so still a couple of years out, but it will be a powerful rocket on the scope of which we have not seen for quite some time. jeff bezos expandh to paying customers. taroline: there is a grea story on bloomberg about taxpayers and how much they might be on the hook. is this something you think is becoming known by the general this something private companies should look to themselves? >> the launch industry as an industry is familiar with mishaps, and whenever a rocke

an aggressive defense of the original. also missing was an original reference to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. originally there was a highlight at the beginning that this is necessary in part because of sematech --september 11. we all, tragically him -- -- we all remember tragically remember what happened. there were some visa holdovers, which was one of the chief criticisms -- you said this was to present -- prevent this kind of thing, but you are comparing apples to oranges in populations. these are not the right people. these are not the droids you are looking for, to be very geeky about it. host: our next call is from iran on our line for others. go ahead. caller: thank you for taking my call, c-span. can you hear me? host: go ahead. we can hear you. caller: today i am so disappointed -- so disappointed at mr. president. this travel ban, i don't think has anything to do with stopping terrorists from coming into the united states because none of them committed any act of terror on u.s. soil. i am not disappointed because

blue origin has signed a satellite operator as its first client.he company prepares to launch more powerful rockets in the next decade. jeff bezos announced the news in washington. >> a few months ago, we started approaching customers and the company was very interested right away, and it was, it is really a great partnership, because they have done so many new vehicles in the past, so we couldn't hope for a better first partner because they're going to be able to help. caroline: bloomberg was at the satellite 2017 conference and joins us from washington. >> it is a huge step for blue origin as a company. this is a company that has lived on jeff bezos's dream, and now they have revenue in the form of a paying customer. it is notable that this announcement was made at satellite 2017. this is the first step towards more paying clients in the future. caroline: i believe they have already been a customer of spacex. how do space x and virgin galactic compare? >> we are seeing the continual development of new and more powerful rockets able to launch sate

what would a judge decide on if not the text and the original meaning? well, to that effect, i received a letter from a friend of mine and an expert in this area, brian garner last week. brian is a well known writer and lawyer and is a distinguished research professor of law at southern methodist university in dallas, texas. brian's written extensively on judging and appellate advocacy and the law generally. he was in attendance at the hearings last week, and as i said, he's written a number of books, including with judge gorsuch on judicial precedent and with justice scalia on reading law. but in a recent letter, brian echoed the same point made by both of these men at different times, that adherence to the text is essential to our system of government. he said the very fact of having a written constitution meant that we had fixed its meaning in permanent form. that seems so obvious, but apparently it's not obvious to some of the critics. he said the very fact of having a written constitution meant that we had fixed its meaning in permanent form. in oth

this is exactly what the original looks like. this is a first edition, on the origin of species, but this one is from the natural history museum in new york because it was easier to photograph for a publishing house in new york. this is basically what it looks like. it was a stout green book printed by john murray, the english publisher who is famous in my world for also publishing herman melville's moby dick, and darwin sent it to azor gray in late 1859. it crosses the atlantic and arrives here, we don't know the exact date, but around decembe december 10 or december 15, someplace in that time period. he devours the book. he marks it up with pencil, this is why i came here to look at this thing, he put asterix and exclamation points, he is underlying passages, occasionally he will write yes, i agree, sometimes he will write no i disagree, and then those tend to be longer explanations, as though he is taking notes so he can provide feedback for darwin. he reads the book quickly, and filled it with notes, the back of the book has

. -- - 3- l -- 3“ fm; in; ’ originally put -- - 3- l -- -t . "1 u -1 - originally put in place by --etieah3-ae we re administratien,—ametieah3-ae were being forced to an entire fleet of these lower these low president trump requirements. president trump has ‘ promised . review these rules. | | 1 t if)? 73-377 -- ,ltttw 7 7t; | | . tt t77tt77;7 7ttt77 7 7|ttt7777t 7 7t-t7-3 are | | 1 tt t77tt77;7 7ttt77 77t7 7|ttt7777t 7 7t7-3 a re to | | 1 tt 7t77t7;7 7ttt77 77t7 7|ttt7777t 7 7t7-3 a re to t3335 t we are going to ensure that any regulations we fe- protect your jobs, yourjobs, yourfactories. we defend yourjobs, yourfactories. we will be fair. but it is - to i how these particular see how these particular regulations have hurt america's auto industry which has i revving in have hurt america's auto industry whit record - revving in have hurt america's auto industry whit record - r forng in have hurt america's auto industry whit record - r for the1 have hurt america's auto industry whic record - r for the last st'él— llllll, lllll lllvlllvlllllll — ,,, — yous. l,,l llllll, lllll lllvlllv

which is an aggressive defense of the original. also missing was the original reference to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. we all tragically remember what happened september 11 and they were by and large illegal visa holders, which is one of the chief criticisms initially. these are not the right people, not the joys we were looking for, to be very greeeky about i. >> our next call is cory in. from iran. on our line for others. go ahead. >> hi, thank you for taking my call, cspan. ok okay. can can you hear me? >> go ahead. we can hear you. >> today, i'm so disappointed. so disappointed at mr. president. this travel ban i don't think has anything to do with the stopping terrorist from entering the united states because none of f the residents ever committed any act of terror on u.s. soil i'm not disappointed because i'm no longer able to travel to united states. but i'm worried about the message it sends to extremists and further more, it contradicts the message america and especially the state department, always had for the world, whic

the original is thought of as being very very original. , it would be to besmirch it, to follow it witht was highly repetitive. so we we left it. , it was only when the 20 years later, the 20-year anniversary loomed on the horizon, that we sat down around a table very like this in edinburgh. myself and the screenwriters the , two producers. we talked about it, and something a bit more personal emerged, a bit more painful about men aging over time. and what men, because they had indulged themselves as much as you could ever imagine someone indulging themselves on the edges of society, then to be caught in what it means to move from that boyhood to that manhood, really. and the film is really a study of male, of masculinity over that time period. >> it is reflective, and is said, because what has happened to them over these 20 years is not necessarily wild success. danny: no, it isn't. they feel like they have been treading water, at best. and but for instance has remained an attic, on and off, addicted. sick boy is in an ever decreasing circle of scams. and rents in has had this crisis i

that is the original keys, and the washingtonjudge and is the original keys, and the washington judgended the ban in the first place. because university businesses said that this is going to hurt us, foreign students cannot come, and thejudge in that foreign students cannot come, and the judge in that case found that they had justified cause. because they had justified cause. because they were suffering in some way. it is not clear how the revised executive order is going to play into those arguments, but these cases have got to be assessed, because of some of the grounds of suspending the original band have been met. thank you for, barbara. the headlines on bbc news: president trump has signed a new executive order, imposing a ban on travellers from six mainly muslim countries. iraq is no longer on the list. the head of the french car company psa, has played down fears of british plant closures, after its takeover of vauxhall. he says he has faith in the uk's 4,000 workers. leaders of the french centre—right have reaffirmed their support for francois fillon as their candidate in next

what will judge decid the judgef not the text and the original meaning? to the effect i received a letter from a friend of mine and experts in this area last week. he's a well-known lawyer and writer and among the many impressive accomplishments as a distinguished research professor in dallas texas. he's written extensively on judging and appellate advocacy and the law in general. he was in attendance at the hearings last week and as i said, he's written a number of a read precedent and with the justice on reading the law does in a recent letter he echoed the same point made by both of these men at different times that in the hearing it is essential to the system of government he said the fact that having a written constitution meant that we fixed the meaning in permanent form. that seems obvious but apparently it is not obvious tot some of the critics. he said the fact that having a written constitution meant that we fixed its meaning and words permanent form. in other words, our constitutioo isn't meant to flow on the whims of judges bound only by prece

rehash of what we had done originally. the original is thought of as being very original.be to besmirch it, follow it was something highly repetitive. we left it. it was only when the 20 years later, the 20 year anniversary loomed on the horizon, that we sat down around the table like this in edinburgh. two producers. we talked about it or something aboutersonal emerged managing over time. they indulge themselves as much as was possible to imagine. in what, to be caught it means to move from that boyhood to that mahood, really - - manhood, really. the film is really a study of masculinity over that time period. host: what is happened to them over these 20 years is not necessarily wild success. danny: no, it isn't. they feel like they have been treading water, at best. sick boy is in an ever decreasing circle of scams. he is forced back by this crisis, really. >host: mark took off with all te money at the end of the original movie. everyone is still upset with him over this. danny: he runs away. 20 years later, he is still running, but on a treadmill now. wall is hit very h

we've taken dinosaur origins, which originally were thought to be southern hemisphere, and brought them into the northern hemisphere, and it could well be that dinosaurs originated even within britain itself. what we have here is a key specimen in this analysis. and here is the fossil that led to this shock finding — a primitive dinosaur the size of a cat was found in lossiemouth in scotland. it was an animal like this that led to the creatures that dominated this planet for 165 million years. the new family tree will mean that we will have to rethink our ideas of how they evolved and spread across the globe. this is a fairly major change to our knowledge of dinosaurs. we have had a system in place for 130 years, we thought we understood the relationships of these big groups of animals, but it may be that we have a major rearrangement of the dinosaur tree. this re—evaluation of fossils challenges a theory that has been accepted since the victorian era, and so will be controversial. but if it is proved to be correct, textbooks on the subject will have to be rewritten. let's take a look a

the question is whether this national origin measure was an active discrimination. the president is going to take issue that national security was given a footnote and we have to ask ourselves as patriots, do we want to cartel a president's ability to control our border. the president could create a better vetting system by having a secretary of state -- it is because of proprietary interest of a change that it has and constitutionally for nationals have no right to our constitutional if they hit u.s. shore. >> what if the president says we are at war with japan. >> the japanese of the worst of america's history. when they exercise this authority, they must do it in a non-discriminatory way. >> allan, when you look at this, what do you make of it? is this more success of the governor we just heard or expected? >> we so many hearings today. we are still waiting for ruling from those judges. what i am curious about now is what happens next. you guys were talking about the idea that disconnects between president trump and the party. we have seen a disconnect between tr

while many tried to argue that originalism is inherently conservative others pointed out that originalism has been ascribed to by liberal judges and academics, as well. professor at harvard law school once described the late justice black as a liberal originalest. would you agree that originalism is not by itself political in nature? >> yes i would. if i might just give an example or two. it's absolutely true that much of the interest in originalism at the beginning was generated by critics of court decisions and originalism has been associated with conservatives to some extent. but originalism is the idea that we are going to enforce the original meaning of the united states constitution and the united states constitution has implications that both conservatives and progressives, both democrats and republicans can welcome. let me give an example that relates to the question we have just been dusziiscussing, the rs of corporations. justice thomas in his opinion in the donald case says that incorporation of the bill of rights can only be justified under privileges or immunities clause of u

we‘ve taken dinosaur origins, which originally were thought to be southern hemisphere, and brought theml that led to this shock finding — a primitive dinosaur the size of a cat was found in lossiemouth in scotland. it was an animal like this that led to the creatures that dominated this planet for 165 million years. the new family tree will mean that we will have to rethink our ideas of how they evolved and spread across the globe. this is a fairly major change to our knowledge of dinosaurs. we have had a system in place for 130 years, we thought we understood the relationships of these big groups of animals, but it may be that we have a major rearrangement of the dinosaur tree. this re—evaluation of fossils challenges a theory that has been accepted since the victorian era, and so will be controversial. but if it is proved to be correct, textbooks on the subject will have to be rewritten. there has been angry reaction in the united states because a child was not allowed to board a plane because she was wearing leggings. it stated that her leggings did not meet the past dress code. now

as if original originalism -- >> is is bound by the law?>> of course it is. >> those that believe that the constitution is a living breathing document that can. >> guest: and nobody else, that bothers me. but - there are people on the supreme court that has a view that the constitution is a living breathing document. related to the times in which we live in. that seems to open the door that i can get the outcomes i want not so much bound by the words of history. the bottom line is, there are different ways of looking at the role of being a judge. do you believe that your way of looking at being a judge has stood the test of time? >> idea. facebook.com/booktv believe that last 10 years your way of looking at being a judge has received respect for people who disagree with you? >> i think you will hear from some of them tomorrow. facebook.com/booktv believe the american bar association has looked in your way of being a judge and found you well-qualified? >> i am very honored by their assessment. >> have decided over 2700 cases, is that right?

moorings as a original historian. the book opens with the bloodiest mutiny ever suffered by the royal navy. it's a horrific eruption during the most storied epic and british seafaring history. at the height of the french war when england stood in peril by invasion, mutineers in september of 1797 murdered the captain, hugh pickett and nine other officers aboard the hms hermoine a 33 gone for gate. this was manned by more than 150 seamen. slashed by cutlasses, their skulls crushed by tomahawks the officers including captain pickett were heaved overboard into the caribbean, ten leagues off the western coast of puerto rico. the carnage sent shockwaves across the british isles while scores of mutineers upon abandoning the frigate on the spanish main scattered to the far shores of the north atlantic. ten years ago, on hearing the name hms hermoine i would have instantly conjured up visions of the harry potter's enduring sidekick. the mutiny by contrast has proven over the years far less memorable. especially in the united s

so i won't pin you down hard on the term originalism, but many have critiques originalism, including in some statements yesterday and today here, as backward focused or "too rigid in adapting to our changing culture." do you believe that originalism is just one judicial philosophy among many, or is it a description of what judges do? >> i am with justice kagan on this. i think it is what we all want to know. i don't know a judge who wouldn't want to know what the original understanding is of a particular term in the constitution or a statute. that's information that will be valuable to any judge and considered by any judge. again in heller, for example, second amendment case. deeply thoughtful opinions by both sides on that question. it doesn't necessarily decide the case but it provides us a language to talk to one another in which we are trying to seek something outside of ourselves, outside of our own personal beliefs about what constitution or the statute at hand means. we're trying to do it in a way that's neutral and that we can say provides fair notice to those whose lives we'

forth our a stence and our creation is free and original origin in an existence and wareness that has materialized on turtle island. e understand the ideas of domination and dehumanization as they are referenced in the instructions and warnings e have heeded for sustained existence as original free people. we understand that the discovery escape of formerly referred to as the doctrine of discovery used by of spain and england have manifested the idea and dehumanization against you're original free eople and we understand the doctrine of discovery by historical monarchies was unholy d by ininstruction by writ of papals in 452, 1455 and 1493 by and through former popeless catholic church. we understand the dominating and de haou ing force in the izing forming of america and the doctrine of f the discovery in the origin of federal indian law signed in the ruling by the supreme court in 1955 by reaffirmed in .he supreme court ruling we understand the judicial domination that being used by america's judicial and executive and legislative pwrapbgss an disputes with the original and free peo

blue origin has signed a client.is a company which prepares to launch more powerful rockets in the next decade. they announced the partnership. few months ago, we started approaching customers and, you they were very interested right away, and it is really a great partnership because they have done so many new vehicles in the past, and so we could not hope for a better first burner because they are going to be able to help. caroline:. hall was at the satellite 2017 conference and joined us from washington. >> it is a huge step for the company. explorationace company that has lived on jeff bezos' dream and they have a paying customer. this is the satellite industry's premier networking and conference event, so this is probably the first of what will likely be more paying clients in the future. caroline: they have already been a customer of spacex. how does spacex compared to where blue origin is right now? the: what we are seeing is continual development and improvement of new and more powerful rockets that are capabl

restrictions affect travelers from six muslim majority countries now- not the original seven-iraq hasdropped from the ban. iraq is an important ally in the fight to defeat isis.likely in part avoid the chaos from the first time around..the new order goes into effect march 16th- not immediately like the original- and expires after 90 days... it includes specific, different language stating the ban does not apply to green card and valid visa holders unlike the original, it does not prioritize religious miniorities in refugee admission cases... and it no longer singles out refugees from syria to be indefinitely banned. admissions for syrians will, like all other refugees be suspended for the next 120 days. democrats aren't buying the changes... its still basically a muslim ban, it's still a ban based on one's religion. in washington, dianne gallagher. new tsa pat downs at airports across the country have some people worried they might be more invasive. the tsa says the changes simply streamline previous multiple pat downs into one universal procedure. the administration did inform san fr

you did not sit on the original panel? >> no, i did not. >> the tenth circuit from 1996 and drawn from the supreme court's own opinion and board of education versous rawly in 1982 held that a school district is compliant with idea so long as the student is quote making more than dimin mouse program in school. my democratic colleagues have repeatedly demand had over the last three days that judge gorsuch follow precedent. and indeed i will commend them for highlighting this case as yet another example of judge gorsuch doing exactly that, following precedent. following precedent in the tenth circuit, that itself was following precedent from the united states supreme court. judge gorsuch, as a judge of the tenth circuit, were you bound to follow tenth circuit precedent? >> yes, senator. >> and if the supreme court changes the precedent, are you then bound to follow the new precedent? >> yes, senator. that's how it works. >> that is precisely how it works. >> and in this instance, the fact that you followed precedent faithfull

the lamb was originally a word that meant to beat. you lamb something like lamb based or you would lamb or lame a horse by beating it. but i don't know if we are going to beat our poor lambs to death. the marsh pit. it does get a little swampy in there when everybody is dancing around and slamming against each other. it was originally called a slam pit, then it became a mash pit, then a mosh pit. who knows. that one has yet to be defined. i like the vegetable melody. i got this from a woman who served us saying today we have a vegetable melody. how does the song go? inch by inch, row by row, i am going to make my garden grow. i guess that would be a vegetable melody. a dinner entre, on the tray, there it is. what more can you say? now he might need a device to remember this lawn but the rest of us need a mnemonic device. here in charlottesville they have rapid fans. they move pretty fast. something that reels its ugly heads i like to think of a giant cat fish myself as an example of that one rearing its ugly head. and a ring bear. usu

though they originate elsewhere. what you have now in the modern communication system is people who can pick and choose what they want to see, when they want to see it adding video recording to it, and they're treating it less like the mass medium and more like personalized channels that can enter their lives at any time. i was thinking of c-span, being part of this recently, comparatively recently with periscope. periscope essentially allows anyone to be your own tv channel online. there was a.at which the house of representatives turned off the cameras and someone said, we do not control this. well, guess what, i'm on periscope, you want it? and a lot of c-span pick that up what was a contentious but came to a close about what was going on in the chambers. in a nutshell, that shows where we are now. that is on a business side everything that you thought that was going to be the status quo is a little bit different from the consumer side and if so many more decisions and choices that you have but here's the thing th

it also removes the preference for religious minorities in the original ban. that was language used by critics and legal opponents that practiced religious discrimination. green card legal residents are reportedly exempt from this one. that was also an issue of confusion. most importantly, it keeps the temporary ban on six of the seven countries named. it does not include iraq in this, and that's because there was a lot of criticism that that hurts the u.s. efforts fighting isis in iraq. there are a lot more details which we'll get to you as soon as we have confirmation and as soon as we see that reporting or the announcement from the department of homeland security. let's talk about that and a number of other issues with the president of voter latino and msnbc contributor norm ornstein and richard painter. maria theresa, let's start with you. we're expecting secretary of homeland security john kelly, secretary of state rex tillerson and attorney general jeff sessions to unveil the details. we're standing by live. green card legal residents are now exempt. tha

and the original ace was being very, very original and it would be to besmirch it to follow it with somethingighly repetitive. so we left it. when the 20-year anniversary loomed on the horizon, we sat down at a table like this, the two writers myself and the producers, and we talked about it and something a bit more personal and a bit more painful, really, about men aging over time, really. and they indulge themselves as much as was ever possible to imagine someone indulging themselves on the edges of society, and then to be caught in what it means to move from that boy hood to manhood, really, and the film is a study of masculinity over that time period. >> glor: it's reflective and it's sad because what's happened to them over these 20 years has not necessarily been wild success. >> no, it isn't. they feel like they have been treading water at best. and spud, for instance, has remained the addict, on and off in rehab, back on, back addicted. and sick boy is in an ever decreasing circle of scams, really. and rinsen had a crisis in amsterdam with money and he's forced back with this medical c