it reveals the flaw in the entire originalist argument.rvative wing has imposed its own world view. when we actually found out what the founders did think, as here, it turns out they were settle jk pragmatic, avoided bars understood change was inevitable and therefore government would have to adpapt. they wanted the experimentation. here is the irony, true originally. does reflect the desires of the foubers, and those were that we be smart and [ male announcer ] this is corporate caterers miami, florida. in here, great food demands a great presentation. so at&t showed corporate caterers how to better collaborate by using a mobile solution in a whole new way. using real-time photo sharing abilities, they can create and maintain high standards from kitchen to table. this technology allows us to collaborate with our drivers to make a better experience for our customers. [ male announcer ] it's a network of possibilities -- helping you do what you do... even better. ♪ ♪ hershey's chocolate syrup. stir up a smile. i know this stuff and i love i

it reveals the flaw in the entire originalist argument.rvative wing has imposed its own world view. when we actually found out what the founders did think, as here, it turns out they were settle jk pragmatic, avoided bars understood change was inevitable and therefore government would have to adpapt. they wanted the experimentation. here is the irony, true originally. does reflect the desires of the foubers, and those were that we be smart and nuanced. that is what smart government is all about. that's my view. [ male announcer ] cookies with smooth caramel and chocolate. ♪ ♪ hmm twix. also available in peanut butter. the buck stops here is phrase commonly used to significant anify taking responsibility. and it has been use famously by presidents, but it apparently did not make it across the pond. james murdoch was grilled for over two hours about his knowledge of the phone-hacking practices, and james knew exactly who was at fault. all of the people below him. >> i think it's self-evident that in hindsight in knowing what we know now, wha

are the biggest originalists, and we should go to the original meaning of the constitution, and thisthese prisons -- >> and we know what the founders thought about search and seizure from the government. they didn't like it, and this is an incredibly increasing the cost of every time you come in contact to have a conversation with someone in law enforce lt right now, it is a terrible decision and distinct from that majority for whatever economic and commerce clause issues and other things, and it has something to do with the obama care, too, because it is "gonzalez versus raiche" because it is the biggest commerce clause and scalia was in my view on the wrong side which was a medical marijuana case. because it was seen as part of the war on crime, he flipped and it was on the wrong side of that and that will affect how the affordable care act. >> let me pull a melissa harris-perry move here, because one thing that you do as a teacher is to pull out the counter attacks, and i disagree with the act, and i want to be clear here, but there is a silver lining that in procedural criminal a

actually the president does recognize that but you know sudden aside school lia calls himself an originalist saying he's only reflecting the original intent of the founders but the entire eighteenth century the first century of this nation's existence the supreme court never once struck down a law or even claimed to have the power to do that based on the constitution the courts have clearly overreached turning to the dictators of our nation throwing out the will of we the people of marbury nine hundred three the citizens united and twenty tend to this week strip search decision they're both throwing out laws and making laws powers only given in the constitution to the president and congress respectively a lot of other countries are not that crazy the united kingdom the supreme court has no power to overturn laws just like in our constitution there are only the final appeals court in disputes between parties in switzerland the supreme court advises the parliament about what's constitutional what's not in their opinion but the parliament can ignore them and frequently does in canada the suprem

stevens, kind of remarkably, i think in debord to me, justice klee who we know is a self-described originalist on the ground, on his own ground, and try to muster evidence that some people found pretty compelling but not five justices, as to whether the framers meant the second amendment to apply to an individual right or only a right extension of membership in a militia. so that was originalism sort of at its height when he had all nine justices kind of fighting out originalism. it came out, it's like they were shocked. we don't really know. the text isn't he just the the history is ambiguous. we could stand here all day and call in experts on the second amendment, and we wouldn't get any agreement. so what to do about that. justice breyer had an interesting separate opinion in that case. he joined the stevens dissent and he also wrote separate to say look, this is not a productive way to go about this. we need to look more pragmatically. we need to go back. if we're going to go back to the framing, we need not to get hung up on text and whether, was, you know, the strange with the second ame

now we are working to develop political, economic, social, cultural and originalist nation. this will be a period of transition toward resolving conflicts and allowing people in the region to manage their affairs and to develop economically and socially. the third challenge that we are facing is providing general, real answers to the economic and social problems. the people when they went to the street, asking for democracy because they understand the link between lack of democracy and the social and economic problems. employment, health problems, educational problems, all these problems. the new governments dealing with these critical issues. and since two weeks we have debated in the parliament, the development of new national -- related to provide the industry, financial resources to the poor people for health and education. and this is one of the biggest challenges. poverty, illiteracy, employment, health services and we are working on this. and the fourth challenge, the last, is taking advantage from the new political environment that is emerging in the region, to devel