after ilya we will hear from orin kerr. orin is that fred c. stevenson research professor of law at george washington law school. he got a ba from princeton, a masters from stanford and his church doctorate from harvard. after graduation he clerked on the third circuit for judge leonard garth and announces green card for justice anthony kennedy. orin is a national recognized scholar in the areas of criminal procedure and also computer crime law. it work for all while at the justice into crime and intellectual property section. he has argued many cases throughout the country including the u.s. supreme court, and his articles have appeared in top legal journalism -- journals. orin who randy barnett describe as a one man would court with respect to this debate will discuss what role academics and commentators played in the run up to this case, and he will compare that with the role that academics and commentators have played in other supreme court cases. last bus or in at least we were there from randy barnett, randy is a professor of legal theory

after ilya we will hear from orin kerr. orin is the fred c. stephenson research professor law at george washington law school. a masters from stanford and gestures doctor from harvard. he clerked on the third circuit and then on the supreme court for justice anthony kennedy. orin is a nationally recognized scholar in areas of criminal procedure and also computer crime law. he worked for a while in fact at the department of justice computer crime and intellectual property section. is argued many cases throughout the country including the u.s. supreme court, and his articles have appeared in top legal journalism. orin the randy barnett described as a one man court with respect to this debate will discuss what role academics and commentators played in the run up to this case and he will compare that with the role that commentators have played in other supreme court cases. last but certainly not least we'll hear from randy barnett. randy is a professor legal theory at georgetown law center where he teaches on a whole variety of subjects. is a grad

orin is a scholar of the fourth be amendment. he's the real expert on that area. i am somewhat entrenching into his field as i raise questions about the constitutionality, the dubious constitutionality of the nsa bulk day collection rams. but i certainly know the difference between being a fourth amendment scholar and not dig being one. so -- not being one. i do think it would be a big mistake the somehow our colleagues were to think blogging is scholarship. bloging is not scholarship, and it could be, i suppose, my colleague has legal theory blog. that almost amounts to scholarship, that does amount to scholarship, but that's totally unique. generally peek speaking, we are just utilizing the knowledge and expertise we have developed in real scholarship, and we're putting it to use. what blogging does allow us to do, though, is learn how to write better than we might have written in the long form law review articles. i couldn't get an op-ed place in the newspaper until i started blogging because i kept writing in this sort of, you know, inverted way that would not

orin a few days he is meeting with berlusconi to reach an agreement on how to push this.is really national reform that i see -- i'm sorry -- to see implemented before the election. passed, law has been bubbly any excuse to -- an election would be taken. sorry. i think that is that major argument now. the other reforms are for the future. >> perform such a structural reforms -- reforms such as structural reforms. it almost lessens the need, the urge. to many that to start rising again? -- do we need that to start rising again? up.tocks are >> draghi -- is lesseed for reform urgent, but the economic reality and social as well is so dire in italy at the moment. there are still quite a lot of pressure. dire that it would give the average person and urgency about voting for reform? reform has been quite unpopular. >> i think so. pollsason i say -- in the tobecause people do not want -- they were not expecting that movement to get so many votes. people were a little embarrassed in saying that they would vote. i think it is the same thing now. if you are from the right, you do n

after ilya somin, you hear from orin kerr. he has his ba from princeton in a and a masters from sensors and interceptors from harvard. after graduation he worked on the third circuit for leonard garth and the supreme court for justice anthony kennedy. he is nationally recognized as a scholar in the areas of criminal procedure and computer crimes and intellectual property and he has argued many cases throughout the country including the u.s. supreme court and his articles have appeared in top legal journals that he was described as a one-man part of this debate. he will discuss what role the academics and commentators played in the run-up to this case and he will compare that with the role that commentators have played in other supreme court cases as well. last but not least you hear from randy barnett who is the waterhouse professor at georgetown university of law center where he teaches on a variety of subjects. he's a graduate of northwestern university and harvard law school. he began his career as a prosecutor and the stat

the metering lights orin. they were turned on with a crash.francisco side. it was not before this backup and the meetering lights on. the map will show you that it's slow on the bridge incline toward treasure island. the approach off the berkeley curve, berkeley itself is all right. 24 out of the caldecott. 880 and 580 smooth through oakland. a smooth drive, these speeds showing you in the green, your commute direction north and south through downtown. good stuff. as we look out to the other maps a footh flow around that castro valley y, in general a lighter flow. an earlier crash, it looked like the flares they laid out have started to burn out and there is less of a distraction. the rest of the peninsula and the roadway moves smoothly, cal train has an issue in redwood city. might want to consider 101 is clear and it's a good at mat. smooth through san jose. the volume of traffic at the 680/101 interchange. it's friday. back to you. >> thank you so much, mike. 6:36. deputies need your help catching a suspected copper wire thief. take a good

. >> thank you, senator orin hatch. i yield myself seven minutes. plus whatever else i might need. is very good to be here and i want to thank you. [laughter] i want to thank the attorney general for the good work that he does. i know that he has aided with great skill by two former chuck schumer employees camellia williams who has been gone for a while and brian fallon we miss very much. and so first on autism spectrum disorders. i know you are familiar with the case. he is a child with autism spectrum disorder. and he wandered away from his school this fall without help. 50% of all asd children wander in his remains were found three months later about 11 miles from the school where he vanished from. the heart of new york's win out to his mother and grandmother and i have numbered them and i know that their grief and heartache is big. cheered by many parents with autism. you can imagine it's a very heart-wrenching situation. and so right after he went missing, i call upon the department of justice to expand a current grant program that you have in place, which is provided for the

they went from being supportive and orin hatch backing in 20 years ago, being in strong opposition. mitt romney famously put into place a very similar healthcare law in massachusetts. host: while we're on topic, on the senate side, you wrote about this, it's about the nuclear option passed for judicial nominations and other things. does it stay there? what's your take? guest: at the moment, there's any push by democrats to expand it. there's no question by changing the rules in the senate in the middle of session, republicans were outraged that this will change further in the future. in some future senate when republicans have control, if they have control of the senate and white house, they'll push through a change on legislation or the democrats will too. it's a pandora's box. once you change the rule and the majority gets to do what it wants, there's no stopping in the future. harry reid said they are doing this because of republican blockading. that said, by changing the rules, it means it's easier to change it again in the future. it's going to keep happening. it sear seriously

they went from being supportive and orin hatch backing in 20 years ago, being in strong opposition. mitt romney famously put into place a very similar healthcare law in massachusetts. host: while we're on topic, on the senate side, you wrote about this, it's about the nuclear option passed for judicial nominations and other things. does it stay there? what's your take? guest: at the moment, there's any push by democrats to expand it. there's no question by changing the rules in the senate in the middle of session, republicans were outraged that this will change further in the future. in some future senate when republicans have control, if they have control of the senate and white house, they'll push through a change on legislation or the democrats will too. it's a pandora's box. once you change the rule and the majority gets to do what it wants, there's no stopping in the future. harry reid said they are doing this because of republican blockading. that said, by changing the rules, it means it's easier to change it again in the future. it's going to keep happening. it sear seriously