thank you so much, orrin.house republicans together. thank you so much, john, for the great job you're doing. and pete sessions, an outstanding job at the nrcc and finally, i want to thank probably the best idea man we've ever had is back in action and providing great suggestions. sometimes on a virtually hourly basis. our speaker tonight, newt gingrich. thanks for being with us, newt. as jon voight indicated this new administration has got a very, very radical agenda. it's been pushing hard and we've been pushing back. they may have the numbers but we've had some successes we can be proud of. for example, a couple of weeks ago, they came up to capitol hill saying they wanted to transfer terrorists from guantanamo. well, i'll tell you something, there's a better place for those terrorists than virginia or kentucky or kansas. it's right where they are in a cell in guantanamo. let me tell you something else, the administration got the message when 90 senators agreed with us on the senate floor. they've been real

i want to say to my friend and colleague, the vice chairman orrin hatch, he has been a warrior in raising money for us. if you have been the recipient of one of his calls, you know what i am talking about. he is making calls a day and night. he is making calls from washington, and utah, and wherever he is to wherever you happen to be. many of you know that i am here because of a call from him. no matter how much you play good the supple, you know that you can give more, and he will be the first person to remind you. thank you for being a great vice chairman and serving as our dinner chairman tonight. [applause] it is a refreshing thing to give the kind of speech from hollywood that he gave tonight. to newt gingrich, he has been an idea factory for our party for many years. we look forward to hearing from you. thank you very much for being here tonight. thank you for your leadership and your ideas. and i want to say to governor palin and her husband, thank you for being here with us tonight. thank you for your great leadership. we appreciate you very much. [applause] now we are going to ha

vernon wells runs it down. >> rob: yeah, they have a vern orrin out -- vernon out there. he can run them down. >> bob: he's really good. >> rob: yes, he is. >> bob: vernon wells won three straight gold gloves 2004, 2005, 2006. >> rob: here it is real speedsmack off the bat. watch vernon wells get a great jump and easily neighboring sure doubleoff. you my man. thanks, vernon. >> bob: he caught that ball before he got there because of the jump. >> rob: yeah, right off the crack of the bat. if it's off the end of the bat, you have no chance. he timed that perfect. >> bob: here is adam dunn. rolen playing up the middle in case they get a ground ball up the bag. that's not a ground ball, but it's way foul. all right. look who ends up with it. it's beach bash night. she could have worn that outfit to the beach and got a baseball. nice. adam dunn, 1-2 with a base hit up the middle. cubs, by the way, won that game against cleveland 8-7, so another one for the national league today. cubs scored a run in the 10th to win it. derek lee hit two homers today. adam dunn off the end of t

. >> go ahead, orrin. >> thank you, mr. chairman. the purpose is to prohibt the use of comparative effectiveness research by providing the standard of care in state and federal courts. now, what i'm concerned about, i believe patients and providers should better understand their care and be confident of its efficacy but never lose sight of the fact or of the basic understanding that medicine is simply not an exact science. we're all different beings and we sometimes need different therapies, some drugs work for some people, some work for others, some don't work for some people as well. there's a varability that affects their treatment outcomes and only within the confines of the physician/patient relationship should treatment decisions be made. we must preserve and protect that physician/patient relationship. what might work for one person or even many patients does not mean it will work for every patient. allows physicians to practice medicine without the fear of frivolous lawsuits and add more medicine through frivolous liability l

maybe i'm not making this as clear, orrin, as i thought. as i understand it, this is -- there is, if by duplication we mean that if there is some spending already going on on one of the 15 programs you've identified, and the harkin proposal that's in the bill spends additional money on that activity, that there would be prohibited from doing so because some money is already being spent on it. it's an existing program. and that -- i understand that point. but it seems to me what we're trying to do here is to provide additional resources, additional support for that activity. the fact that there's already some spending on it shouldn't exclude the program for getting additional funding and support. i pointed out and was wrong earlier. i said there was no oral care programs in any state. that's wrong. it's less than half the states do provide support for oral health. less than half do so in obesity programs. about 23 states do stuff for school-based programs. i mean, there's a disparate levels of funding and support for these activities that th

orrin hatch. -- one- -- oren hatch. >> i will be very short. just want to thank all of you, for being here tonight, and supporting both the health and -- the house and senate. we have to take them back. we simply have to. we love and appreciate all of you, god bless you and keep telling. -- keep helping. >> please welcome pete sessions. >> thank you very much. and you for hosting us tonight -- and i have the opportunity tonight to see exactly what table that i mat. 218. we cannot wait to get there with you. it will be great. let's go to victory. the job in the house is to retire nancy i want to thank each and every one of you for being here tonight. i want to thank paul ryan, who has a great job as the chairman. thank you very much. as you have seen, we have highlighted the american entrepreneur. i like to recognize jay from florida. with a backpack and several dollars, he came to this country to look for the american dream. to becoming the founder of a real-estate investment company, he has built his american dream through hard work and innova

senator orrin hatch called the health care plan the complete liberal mishmash of ideas. guest: if there is a nearly unified or unified republican opposition to big government approach is on health care, combined with an alternative approach that addresses people's actual concerns about health care in a more market-friendly way, i think that would be extremely important to a republican revival. it is hard to see such a revival happening is that does not take place. host: our next call, martha, on the republican line, from austin, texas. -- on the independent line, from austin, texas. caller: first of all, you made the comment about you should have private markets and the market economy works. but it does not, or we would not have to bail out gm and all those other companies. second of all, single payer would be run like medicare. medicare -- i am over 70, and it works fine. it runs at low cost, so i do not understand why you are not more or less promoting that. also, you would be given a choice so if you wanted your own company, you could keep your own plan. but also, you

guest: 62,000 figure was something that senator orrin hatch calculated out yesterday from the cbo analysis that was released late yesterday. the health committee bill in the senate would cost more than one trillion dollars. and that is a number that we will see repeated and thrown around a lot in the next few days, because republicans have been saying for a while now that we don't know what the president is trying to do, that is trying to spend so much money and whether or not he will accomplish his goals. if this was a look at the bill, but there were missing parts in it, missing some parts of the health reform program, and where mandates, a public insurance plan that would change the final calculations and there was left out how much medicaid expansion would cost. that would add a couple hundred million dollars to the bottom line. there are other aspects that the candy staff says will increase the number of people who will be able to be in short. 60 million people is all that would be taken off the rolls. that is falling short of where the president said he wanted to be. i am familiar wi

jeff we go to you and then we go to orrin hatch. go ahead, tom. >> if we're already spending money in that area, why should we spend more? so what this amendment says is anywhere we're actually doing it already, why spend $8 billion on doing it more? until we know it's making a difference. so if we're already building bike trails through the transportation program and through all these other areas, we shouldn't spend this money on bike trails. we're creating dual and triple streams of money to accomplish the same thing. this amendment says if we're spending the money already through another function of government, through another funding source, that we would not use that -- this money would not be used in that direction. which would mean we would use it in something else. still doesn't drop your amendment, it still doesn't keep us from doing it. but just says once we're doing this with a funding source, why come in with a second funding source to do the same thing where, in fact, there may be a point in time. how many bike trails d

three-man lift on vern orrin. >> bob: vernon wells is coming out of his funk 8-18 last. batting average on its way over .250 now. >> rob: gets the fastball where he likes it. he drives it right up the dish. see, when you're trying to come out of a slump though, that's the way do you t you don't try to hit home runs. you try to hit singles. >> bob: this is dangerous with scott rolen stepping in. he flied to center with wells aboard back in the first. he has two men on now. now the hits as i mentioned are coming for rolen, but his power numbers still well down. only four homers this year. 276 in his career. he's 20 behind adam dunn, 13th year in the big leagues. 7 1/2 with the phillies. 4 1/2 st. louis in his second year with the blue jays. >> bob:'d well-publicized falling out with tony la russa that led to his departure with st. louis. >> rob: i thought it started with nick's uncle, larish. didn't he have -- larry bowa? didn't he have problems with the phillies -- >> bob: i don't know, but i know he had problems complaining one year. >> rob: didn't he have a bad shoulder

orrin hatch put out the numbers from the cbo that was released yesterday, that the senate health committee bill would cost more than $1 trillion. that is a number that we are going to see i think repeated and thrown around a lot today and in the next few days because republicans have been saying for a while now that we do not know what the president is trying to do. he is trying to spend too much money and will he accomplish his goals. i think you will hear from democrats that this was a -- that the cbo look at the kennedy bill but there were missing parts of it. it does not look at the bill as a whole, it misses some parts of the health reform program, a public insurance plan that will change the final calculations. it also left out how much medicaid expansion will cost, and that will add a couple of hundred million dollars to the bottom line. there are a couple of other measures that the present -- that kennedy's staff says that will be taken off insurance rolls at at the end of 2017. that is obviously falling way short of where the president said he wanted to be. so i play with that cbo

let me just say to my friend and orrin hatch is a friend of mine, we've worked together on a lot of ins. as you'll recall, having been the author of the class action reform bill and private litigation reform bill, i've certainly written legislation here that's not endeared me to certain constituencies when it comes to what i perceive to be in many cases frivolous lawsuits, so i don't take a back seat to anybody in that area. but the point that senator whitehouse and mikulski have made is this has been a subject of extensive discussion by the judiciary committee, it's a complicated area that is beyond -- >> not this matter. >> well, i understand-- >> litigation has been discussed but not this matter. >> i understand. but this is a matter here that really does go to the heart of judiciary committee jurisdiction for one. i just state that as a point, but secondly, any more that this is a decision by washington to preclude information, anymore by a decision by washington to exclude the information seems to me something we want to avoid and there's going to be, i'm certain, there will be at

thinking when of the proudest moment i had in the seventh about 25 years ago was coal offering with orrin hatch, the first child care legislation since world war ii in this country. if the cord blood issues together and senator kennedy doesn't have a better friend in the senate. the list is along the matters you have worked on together over the years to take the next half hour to get on that list of matters you have worked together on despite coming from different parties in different ideological point of view the have been able over the years to find common ground on matters of no possible and i have a quarter-century ago. you have this appearance of building this calcine of the difficulty and also the means by which you can achieve common results so i'm delighted to part of us in this effort can i thank you, i'm delighted to be part of this. we have been friends for a long time and when we fought for the child care development block grant bill the first child care bill in history nobody thought we are going to get through but we did it in large measure because of your leadership. and i

whether it is my work with orrin hatch on child care or working with other senators on the -- on the no child left behind act, the family medical leave act, i look at colleagues here, john, you work on immigration issues, others, major bills we have all worked on over the years that are huge and significant. but this bill affects everybody. 100% of our fellow citizens will be affected by what we do in the area of health care. every consumer, every business, every provider as well. and so this is truly historic, the journey that we're beginning this morning in this committee to deal with this issue. it may be that none of us will ever work on another issue as significant as the one that we're charged to respond to as members of this committee working obviously with members of the finance committee and significance and importance. and so we begin the markup of the affordable health care choices act. though he's not with us here in person, we make no mistake about it, we're still led by our chairman, my friend, the senator from massachusetts, senator ted kennedy. his life-long quest has