is being developed and some sort of an evacuation arrangement is being put in place reasonable orthorexic do take steps in this direction but it's a direct analogy no one is renouncing it because the earth is not large nor does it have enough energy people can renounce it this is why we should handle atomic energy as a dangerous but useful power source that ought to be developed to my mind the atomic power industry as one major advantage it employs a large number of best individuals scientists personnel are highly mobile us to watch safety and attack of the elements like that is of course a horrible thing but i believe we will learn how to cope with this as well. that russia have focused on what type reactors you. know a boiling water reactor we had a prototype at the nature of a small fifty megawatt reactor we don't have these types of reactors. europe have focus inward type reactors. i don't know if a certain germany has them for sure belgium i think as for the world figure out of the total number of pressurized water reactor was a characteristic feature where water is simultaneously a

smoke over it was a quarter of a century on history seems to be repeating in japan despite the orthorexicthere of having the situation on the ground trawl the fukushima nuclear power plant has already seen pick splosion and that's despite advancing to systems which the chernobyl reactor never had. the reaction was completely false he means. the reactor. the happening and this is very mixed. in. with the sea the decent. but such a situation is unfolding in one of the world's most technologically advanced countries has heightened the sense of alarm internationally but some experts say one should look into how the japanese have been dealing with nuclear physics to get clues as to their continuing difficulties in dealing with a disaster so the technology is decades old. the society the government the regulators believe that the technology can be operated safely but there's a built in psychological complacency if you're operating something that's so inherently dangerous when you go to work every day you keep thinking about how dangerous that technology is that would be over time rather damagin

nothing of the reactor physics the personnel job the reactor intrastate was out of control while the orthorexic. clearly knew who to blame for the fall out even the soviet union's top scientists were at a loss as to what to do in the days that i passed the unfolded model is going to. patients as a remission free will this was something unseen before a nuclear power station with flames and smoke over it was very good or over centuries on history seems to be repeating in japan despite the all four of these claims there are of having the situation on the control the fukushima nuclear power plant has already seen explosions and that's despite advancing to systems which the chernobyl reactor never had been we look to the earthquake reaction was completely false he means. the reactors happen. only and this is very an exception. when we. see the decent that such a situation is unfolding in one of the world's most technologically advanced countries has heightened the sense of alarm internationally but some experts say one should look into how the japanese have been dealing with nuclear physics to get c