have been making for months today. political dialogue is non existent within the atlantic lions. ortiz dahl quarter reports now on the crux appearing within the western military alliance. and how the british prime minister is humbling the pressure what, what do you say? you have only i would say every mutual protection, a greater common purpose, all this seems to go out the window and there's a bit of money to be made. the recent controversy surrounding the u. s. u. k and australia as new security pack has left in new leaders scratching their heads about what even means to be in nato anymore. the reason for nato existence is transatlantic security. this is what we want to remind the united states off. therefore, our partners decided on our initiative as well as on the initiative of germany to revise the strategic concept of the alliance. being allies does not mean being hostage to the interests of another country. at 1st the spat seemed confined to only a few powers. france being upset with the suspension of its submarine contracts with australia, which resulted from offices provisioning of