orwas based on an assumption evidence of weapons of mass distraction that turned out to be wrong.hadowll forever america's presence in iraq. nevertheless, you have to deal with the situation as it is. qi governmentn ira with which we cooperate and that is working hard to rid iraq of the islamic state. fall -- whatever fault lies in the original situation, we have to deal with the situation as it is today. host: dave calling in from jacksonville. are you a current or former member of the military? caller: i'm currently on active duty. host: what is your question? caller: thank you for taking my call. in thectually on a ship 2003 timeframe when we started seeing the chemical weapons against the syrian government. the administration making claims they would act against these chemical allegations and little was done. , they'velook at isis approach --ressive ,o you think the next president the next administration will take a different approach based on what you've seen and read? guest: i do believe the obama administration underestimated the islamic state initially, but they've changed

he made it impossible to say marginal orwas unimportant as a thing to consider.t playing way i see academic conversation, which i think plays over to some extent in the broader legal culture as a whole. >> thank you all. i am pleased the originalist -- his of justice scalia -- onal modesty if i wereu said that king, i would have punished them, but i am not king. he regarded reliability test as that flabby test. for criminal defendants who had been unlawfully searched, and forrative agencies, a lady who tried to poison her husband and was federally prosecuted as a result. how did these opinions inform the justice's greatness? >> i cans be to the flagburning case. the second one was decided my term. texas versus johnson was the state case that came up to term before the 88 term. the following year, congress had passed a statute essentially trying to fix the problem the court had created in texas versus johnson. at the time johnson was decided, 48 out of 50 states prevented the burning of the fight as a means of protest. opinion byin an justice brennan, justice scal