everybody i work with, everybody who knows the newspaper orwell could not see it -- newspaper well could not see this coming. it is an absolute standarstunne. >> could you give some insight on what it was like to work there? he describes a relentless pressure to get stories. is that something that you remember? >> absolutely. any journalist is under relentless pressure in a newspaper journalism bertinelli and newspaper pop journalism, a huge amount of pressure when you're on top of the pile, as "news of the world" always was. it is a collaborative hot house where people are working together with skills being shared. there after tried to get to the best stories entered and protecting them with the best scoops. >> but the phone hacking, as as something you have been aware of? >> no. i was not. just as in other papers, there were sophisticated techniques and devices used. but, all of them to my knowledge were legal. so the idea of phone hacking or voice mail interception was unknown to me and to the colleagues i had. >> the way this is being played out, what you make of the fact that it loo

by going to the new system they'll be able to move to this new system orwell' be able to provide them with an alternative that meets all their needs if they have concerns about it. we're pleased with the technology system. >> do you have a sense of the timeline if those agencies will move over? >> sure. it's a 12-month project plan. to be frank, we started with the easy departments first. we want early successes in the project so we're started with departments that are smaller departments, that have not had email support in the past or have had very limited email support. we put the public safety agencies toward the end of the project as we want to demonstrate a track record of success. we want to take the right amount of time to meet with them and address their concerns for working in partnership with federal agencies and the state agencies to do that. so right now the project plan is a 12-month project plan. >> hi. this is jeff schwartz with "residence magazine." i want to ask two questions. one if the goal is to move off of 365 and if the workers will be using the web client for em

george orwell understood this. if you say the same thing over and over again, even though people at first know it can't possibly be true, but if you say it over and over and over and over again, if you use your own network, fox news, and all of your other outlets, and it's said over and over again, eventually you might start believing it. i think that's what the republicans' playbook. >> but i also believe that one match, you strike it in the dark, you start breaking through the darkness. that's what we're doing. professor robert reich, thanks for your time this evening. >>> amazing testimony today. rupert murdoch proved that denial is a river in london. can he continue as head of news corp? >> plus michelle bulk imagine surges. is the republican party still searches for mr. or mrs. right wing? >>> [ male announcer ] this...is the network -- a living, breathing intelligence that's helping people rethink how they live. in here, the planned combination of at&t and t-mobile would deliver our next generation mobile bro

the bell tolls" tac "stack up with his or books, and did he know or have a relationship with george orwell? >> three big questions. john steinbeck will be our next week's profile. what was his relationship? >> they only met once in new york city and i and it was a bia disaster. words were exchanged and a little too much was drunk and hemingway's -- ohara had a beautiful irish stick that hemingway broke over his head and john ste nirks beck thought hemingway was quite a boor. but they greatly admired each other as writers. in fact, i think steinbeck's grapes of wrath" was a great influence on "for whom the bell tolled" and that hemingway's style of writing was a very important influence on steinbeck. >> the question of "for whom the bell tolls request ," the caller wants to know how it stacks up against his other works? >> well, it's not my favorite work of his works. i think that each work he did was very, very different. it's a more traditional novel than his earlier novels "the sun also rises," the "farewell to arms." as a traditional novel, it's a wonderful novel. it is not an historica

a gentleman by the name of george orwell warned us that the fascists would take over this country wearinglag and carrying a cross. watch the tea party people. the people leaving them are fascists. guest: you are suggesting means testing, one of the things that people have been talking about. it does not go over well with seniors. if you make a certain amount of money, you would get less from social security than your counterpart. that is one of the things that has been discussed on capitol hill. in addition to raising the retirement age. it may come down to that eventually. i do not know that is something you'll have to discuss with everyone who get social security. i would presume that she would have to create some sort of bureaucracy that would say that if you made this amount you get this amount and less, and less. once again you would have the government controlling how much money people make. host: one of the headlines of many you have seen about the fast and furious program, the house oversight committee is having an -- having an investigation on it this morning. we will have covera

can we afford that and the royalty checks you're going to have to send to george orwell? that's the weirdest way of 'just say tax hike.' that's like saying i'm not going on a diet. i'm going to add calories to my excluded food intake." unquote. that was jon stewart. he hit the nail on the head. for sure it's easy to make fun but what the president is trying to do with tax expenditures is no laughing matter. liberals talk about tax expenditures as though they were just getting rid of wasteful spending. first, as a legal matter, tax expenditures are not spending. outlays are checks cut from the treasury department are defined as spending under the congressional budget act. that's what spending is. yet, most tax expenditures only lose revenue and do not include an outlay portion. tax expenditures that only lose revenue contain no spending as defined by the congressional budget act and is scored by the official scorekeepers for congress. the joint committee on taxation and the congressional budget office. and second, as a policy matter twhe comes to tax -- when it comes to ta

can we afford that and the royalty checks you're going to have to send to george orwell? that's the weirdest way of 'just say tax hike.' that's like saying i'm not going on a diet. i'm going to add calories to my excluded food intake." unquote. that was jon stewart. he hit the nail on the head. for sure it's easy to make fun but what the president is trying to do with tax expenditures is no laughing matter. liberals talk about tax expenditures as though they were just getting rid of wasteful spending. first, as a legal matter, tax expenditures are not spending. outlays are checks cut from the treasury department are defined as spending under the congressional budget act. that's what spending is. yet, most tax expenditures only lose revenue and do not include an outlay portion. tax expenditures that only lose revenue contain no spending as defined by the congressional budget act and is scored by the official scorekeepers for congress. the joint committee on taxation and the congressional budget office. and second, as a policy matter twhe comes to tax -- when it comes to ta