the meeting began with the fact that the party the defense requested the recusal of judge osaulov.he reason is that he is considered biased. the judge accepted this request, so literally an hour later it became known that a new judge will consider the case regarding the recusal, the recusal of the judge. inna mikheeva, however, as the defense side noted, she also has no confidence in this judge, and roman chervinsky himself expressed the same opinion. and, later , judge mikheeva announced that the application for disqualification of judge osaulov was not satisfactory, so the case again returned to this very judge, from whom they asked, the defense requested. already when the meeting began, the lawyers once again said that the defense side is exactly the side that is... still interested in getting acquainted with the materials, and since may of last year they have been trying to study them, and they stated, that the position of the investigation , such a position is such... the accusations are simply an imitation of evidence that the lawyers do not want to get acquainted with, and t

the session began with the fact that... the defense side requested the recusal of judge osaulov.eason is that he is considered biased. the judge accepted this request. so, literally an hour later, it became known that the new judge inna mikheeva will consider the case regarding the recusal, the recusal of the judge. however, as the defense pointed out, it also has no confidence in this judge, and he himself expressed the same opinion roman chervinskyi. and later, judge mikheeva announced that the statement of recusal. does not satisfy judge osaulov, so the case again returned to this very judge, from whom the defense side requested. already, when the session began, the lawyers once again said that the defense side is precisely the side that is interested in getting acquainted with the materials, and since may of last year they have been trying to study them, and also stated that the position of the investigation , such a position, such accusations, it's just... an imitation of evidence that lawyers don't want to deal with to familiarize themselves with them, and they simply do no