osha could have been something to read i opposed the clarence thomas nomination. voted against him. there is arealize real and perceived problem the committee faced. they were a bunch of white guys. they were hearing this testimony from the senate judiciary committee. so when anita hill came to testify, she faced a committee that do not fully understand what the hell it was all about. to this day, i regret that i could not come up with a way to get her the kind that she deserved given the courage she deserved by reaching out to us. the hearing she deserved was a hearing where she was respected, where the tone in question were not hostile. for the fact that she stepped forward was recognized as an act of courage and of itself. let's face it, back in 1991, it took a lot of courage to take on a man who was so much a part of the establishment and the power structure. it took a lot of courage to damage her own career and her own reputation in the face of a cultural bias. that, if a woman was harassed she must have done something to deserve it. it took courage. nearly 3

what we saw was that, at the state level in the osha context, the state entertained claims of what is called anticipatory retaliation. where employer takes adverse employment action against an employee who has not yet engaged in protected activity and historically the city reviewed protected activity as a jurisdictional prerequisite. if the retaliation happens before the protective activity, the state entertained claims of that nature, federal government has entertained claims of associational retaliation such that the adverse employment action is taken not against the individual who engaged in protected activity but in a family member of that individual or a close associate of that individual. i would point you also in our report to the monthly review of the matter before the bureau delinquent revenue. there's not much movement. in the case of gwinnett suite, city of san francisco is eagerly waiting in line as these bankruptcy proceedings unfold. like i mentioned at the february meeting, the commission is preparing a number of potential referrals of additional delinquent filers to th

>> so i am going to disagree a little bit with osha here, i normally agree with fully and say i actuallythink we are dpoing going to learn more of the motivation of paul manafort and i am not sure he's necessarily out of the legal woods entirely here. it does seem possible if mueller has sort of one final large over arching conspiracy over the united states, indictment to drop including her members of the trump campaign and other associates and other member of russian intelligence that manafort may be subjected to that. it was notable in manafort's of that 800 page sentencing memo that the special counsel hugh granted dow counsel -- handed down. manafort's attorneys are terrible of redacting documents. the fact that mueller knows some of this stuff that he has not yet told us is pertinent. >> that's fascinating and leaving us on pins and needles as we await the soon to be announcement of what mueller has done. we are waiting for a response from the white house. we know the president of the united states is watching the coverage a v coverage. could the president pardon his former campaign

notice, by the way, she would osha safetyast an standard today. her hair is occupational safety goggles.he is wearing these were dangerous jobs they were doing. they got good training, but it was still dangerous. here of the bomber nose is being polished. you would see the women doing the polishing. notice their hair is tied up. it is some kind of a cloth. it was never totally covered, the whole hair. there were many, many jobs that involved sparks coming from various acts that could have ignited their hair. i once had my hair set on fire from a spark, so i know what it's like. this would never be a loud today. next slide. here are boeing employees. notice the hair tied up. wearing uniforms. women's workers uniforms were very popular. this was a very critical industry at the time. they all look very happy in the posed photo. next slide. i amance, which particularly interested in. the making of ordinance was essential. here you see different stages of ordinance manufacturing. prior to the war, not a single woman would have been in an ordinance fact

he started osha. he did a lot of good things. and with trump it's hard to see what are the countervailing virtues for all of this villainy, which is in plain sight. >> yeah. well, i've got to tell you guys, thank you. and i've got to say don't miss the new cnn original series "tricky dick." the series premieres sunday at 9:00. i can't wait to see this. sunday at 9:00. "tricky dick." ever wonder what the president does during his vacations at mar-a-lago? anybody? who he talks to. what they talk about. we're going to discuss next. ♪ pardon the interruption but this is big! now with t-mobile get the samsung galaxy s10e included with unlimited data for just $40 a month. they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again! aud

he started osha. he did a lot of good things. and with trump it's hard to see what are the countervailing virtues for all of this villainy, which is in plain sight. >> yeah. well, i've got to tell you guys, thank you. and i've got to say don't miss the new cnn original series "tricky dick." the series premieres sunday at 9:00. i can't wait to see this. sunday at 9:00. "tricky dick." ever wonder what the president does during his vacations at mar-a-lago? anybody? who he talks to. what they talk about. we're going to discuss next. fit me! foundation from maybelline new york in 2 finishes matte + poreless and dewy + smooth to fit tone and texture. 64 fits fit me! foundation only from maybelline new york my son forest, he was born while my husband was deployed. i video chatted the entire birth. i had great connectivity. his entire platoon was standing next to him. they kept telling me, "you gotta push! you gotta push!" they all got to meet forest, all together. about 50 of them. and they all started crying. it was the sweetest thing

like osha for example or the epa. all these heavy-handed, so flash when reagan, if we flashforward, and we are not going to skip over jimmy carter, but when reagan comes into office and he says government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem it's because there has been a huge expansion in the 1970s. and so that's the context for that sort of anti-government campaign that he can run in addition with the failure of government to deliver in 1979. becomesur gerald ford one in a line of presidents who cannot get a handle on this at all, right? meg: yeah, you know, so he makes a really interesting decision, one which is hard to fathom today, which is really sort of an ideological decision because in 1974 and 1970 five, in part because of the oil shocks, the economy goes into recession and he has a democratic congress and they want a huge public works spending bill. and he says, you know, i not am going to do that because i think inflation is a bigger threat than depression, and so they negotiate bac

some corporations protected their -- the safety of their workers before we had the osha laws. some corporations didn't use child labor before we had our child labor laws. we need fundamental rules to make sure there's sunshine in this area. and now i'd like to yield to the gentleman from maryland, my friend, mr. sarbanes. the chair: for how much time does the -- mr. levin: the gentleman can have the remainder of my time. mr. sarbanes: i thank the gentleman for yielding. first off, to note that clearly best practices have emerged with respect to public companies, making this kind of information available. but if that best practice has merit, then it ought to be applied across the board, which is the argument that we are making. i want to thank you for your work and interest in this issue. the s.e.c. is there to protect shareholders. it's there to protect the public. that's the purpose of that agency, and within the basket of things and measures that it can do to protect the public is to promote this kind of disclosure. the rider that we're trying to get rid of in this bill that