so there are three companies that we are looking at as otential exit but i think that the short term, seven-year exit is very much overrated and wait for this to play out, 10 years from beginning to end of this capital and you're going to see some real exits. so i wouldn't feel defensive about that answer. the second one is, in addition to exit, when i look at success, i really do start to ink about those category breaking innovations that wouldn't have happened without this kind of investment. so like seven years ago solar had a unit level, first of all, too expensive for a hospital to use. now that you're at 40 million you've proven a model with a profitable company that is continuing to grow, we're also seeing a platform on which you can build other lessons and other kinds of products. so that company has spawned other companies like a company called emcopa which is a joint venture between the solar company and a mobile banking platform in kenya. based on the insight that the poor want access to solar and, frankly, they want access to more than a light. they'd like a system. once y

the value line on median price ,otential uses stocks at 35% one of the highest valuations in history.here is no reason to assume that stocks are going to do well. qe is the most important thing. each time they reduced it, that was a tightening move. several tightening was by the fed, generally after that many moves the market does not go much higher. >> i can train your -- contrarian. thank you so much for joining us. >> coming up, it is called the most expensive rule in the history of the epa, the new proposed limits on ozone. formerfe at any speed, a aading executive has written rebuttal to the michael lewis best-seller. ♪ >> you are watching "market makers." the obama administration wants to clear the air. some of america's biggest is mrs. are not happy about that. the environmental for -- biggest makers are not happy about that. peter cook has the details. what is it that the epa proposed? why are there so many objections about it? >> they are talking about a much tougher national standard and it is not the first time they have threatened to do this. previously the president decid

this legislation go not just to address bola specifically, but also to build capacity for future otential outbreaks or future local and state needs. is that correct? both.will do when we think of the funding prepared go, that is them spending at the frontlines which was the issue that the chairwoman began with in terms at hat kaoeupb of training the frontline and they'll be facilities that will be able to ebola and other things as well. and so while it's focused on the and now weible it will extend just like the raining that will occur, the 500 people who are being in place hose will be in west africa and our work will be in place here. marchio thank you. relay i've spoken with the nicole murphy public ealth officials and they have been very pressure active of the close working relationship of nih and so, hoeup that will continue and i'm sure it will. talk about the hospitals, one of the things that i have heard from hitchcock which is the designated hospital n nicole murphy to be the state's ebola critical referral hospital. they have indicated that they're having trouble getting the per