there were a cple members of cocongress that said t the othey at it is not going anywhere. it is moving forwaward. he could see, if sequestration stays inlace, there could be delays. they got hit a little bit with the fleet. reportnly did the p pentagon they will buy y fewer thanhey theinally planned, but program was slantand the navy for relying too heavily on that particular ship. primarily lockheed in terms of the local region. they split it with another contractor. the other some of players? >> general dynamic and bae systems. nonot a huge surprise for both. in terms of the ground vecle program, tt is kind of a no go. instead, thehey will get modernization of the current fleets, the tas, those sorts of t things. >> peter, in addddition to weaps they're going to eliminate, possibly even an aircraft carrier, they are talking about touchingng salars, benefs, significantl downsizing the army. as an econost, you know, california took a bigit after the reagan yeaears when they lot a lot of the defense spending money that they werere used to. arare we going to see a recessin i