i like the suggestion that we go into closed session and we are able to pull oup -- >> not closed session on this. supervisor kim: actual litigation and we can spend some time crafting language around the nomination that would work for all three of us. we have a motion to move into closed session. and reconvene. we will continue this item after the closed session. thank you. members of the public, we are going into closed session to discuss litigation and we will reconvene on item number 9. thank you.

i like the suggestion that we go into closed session and we are able to pull oup -- >> not closed session on this. supervisor kim: actual litigation and we can spend some time crafting language around the nomination that would work for all three of us. we have a motion to move into closed session. and reconvene. we will continue this item after the closed session. thank you. members of the public, we are going into closed session to discuss litigation and we will reconvene on item number 9. thank you. >> thank you for the members of the public for your patients as we put together some amendments reflecting some concerns from colleagues. we have now submitted a split proposal for the advisory committee. are there any comments or questions? ok. i also wanted to respond to supervisor ferrell's comment about having an advisory body that gave recommendations on legislation. that language was actually listed from several other citizen advisory councils, for example, the local coordinating board and the civilization fund. we're not setting any precedents per se within this piece of legislation.

are even less deliveries, which would put into place a trigger mechanism to allow rates to ratchet oup to 290, effective with 2012 rates. that was the first eisenhower hall that will come before you. -- that is the first item that will come before you. and the proposal for an untreated water discounts. this is in agreement with the county district. particularly, it was to make it consistent for them to pay for only the services. in particular, they are a customer that does not receive treated water. what we have done is gone through our financials in the budget issues and said, what to the discount factor be for this customer that does not receive treated water? we received no protests. we received one letter from the wholesale customers. they thought it was consistent and did not protest the proposed rate. the discussion has been very productive and i would say collaborative with a number of customers. in addition, there is one last thing. there is the environmental enhancement surcharge. that is the second part of the supply allocation discussion that you have late last year. this sa

toolicreports quoted th ne agency and cal tv station a rocke attaing the caital of a province was directed at a oupf pakistani shtes. the police offir id the grp th cariedout the attackas fled the scene. les return tonorth eric our waingt correonde andrea nth. despite the mod in the uted statesfterpresident obama' visit to ground zero. >> as north drk -- we he ckedup the mood at people feel that the venge they want has nobeen achied. and i think that is very much the kind sense that ihave been picking up om talking to peop this week. it isa nd of catharsis. some ceneof jooublation have left pple outside e u.s. mewh uncomfortable and en he the are se who perhaps ve been slightly rried by the sense f triumph buwhat this tls you is just how much osama bin den traumatize this country. >>thfight againsterrism contues and he news we're geing fropakian tt the intelligen serces there are getting informion om e of osama bin lades wives, the will be wantinto share lot more of thatth they w't be teing the publ because his issue of trusbetween the unitedstates and pista very crual. ll, that right. d of course

things along, and the minute you tried to throw some type of change in that process, that screws things oup, and that knocks the system of the rails, and when you have prosecutors underwithholding evidence and not allowing the doors and windows to be open, you have a serious problem, and we in the community have a right to demand that change. i think we have done an abysmal job of holding people accountable in criminal cases. in civil cases, they get sanctioned all the time, but rarely do you see any prosecutor or defense attorney give brought before the state bar disciplinary proceedings and actually take a look at the conduct -- not like what happened in a lot of prosecutorial misconduct case, and whether or not it is harmful or harmless. what we need to do is take a look at the misconduct, because what happened happens around the country on a daily basis. that is ordinary injustice. this guy gets miss hard for misconduct -- misbarred for misconduct, and somebody else skates free. we need to be looking at conduct. we need to be opening up offices. we need to be asking questions and gettin

the ouppings occupation is by definition violent. we are a captive nation. so when you are facing it with nonviolence, of course if you -- if you expose it -- then that is fine and people see the -- but if you don't, people start picking up the same attitude as the -- the same means and this is where you begin to lose, unfortunately. but you do not control all the elements. you do not control how everybody -- you have to constantly explain. you have to show that you're there and you have to be able to show what works. thank you very much. you have always been a great advocate of justice and peace. and a just peace. i think we should acknowledge your efforts. for decades you have stood up and spoken out. now the question of the jewish ness -- this is a new precondition. we were never asked throughout the negotiations, i don't remember ever being told you have to recognize israel as a jewish state. we were asked to recognize israel in 19949 in exchange of letters between yasser arafat and -- we accepted the two-state solution and we can niesed the state of isr

and our seniors, you know, i was up with a oup of seniors in new hampshire and throughout my congressional district and our seniors are saying so us, it isn't just about us and don't count on us supporting this plan just because we happen to be over age 55. we support medicare because we understand what it means for future generations. so this is a link a bond between the young people in this country who are working, our seniors and retirees to protect medicare and protect the benefits that come with it. and i would ask us on this underlying bill, i think my some of my colleagues have spoken to this we need more primary care, already we're seeing what's happening in our system, where 26-year-olds, up to 26-year-olds can be covered on their parent's health insurance. you know what that's doing? it's bringing down the costs, making sure we have more resources to absorb the care that people need as they get older. and so let's not stomach a dismantling of the medicare protections that we've known for almost -- for 46 years in this countrythis contract from one generation to the next generatio