ourjob was to lead the nhs resonse for? ourjob was to lead the nhs response to _ for?d the nhs response to the _ for? ourjob was to lead the nhs response to the covid _ for? ourjob was to lead the nhs response to the covid pandemic. | for? ourjob was to lead the nhs - response to the covid pandemic. add to be directly accountable to parliament as the the funding that flows to the nhs and england which was about £150 billion per year. we need to be clear, don't we, but other the relationship between nhs england and new, and the health secretary, matt hancock. put it crudely, he was not your boss, was he? . . ., , he? the chief executive of nhs encland he? the chief executive of nhs england is _ he? the chief executive of nhs england is accountable - he? the chief executive of nhs england is accountable to - he? the chief executive of nhs england is accountable to the l he? the chief executive of nhs - england is accountable to the board of nhs england, and it felt as if i had many bosses, so the board of nhs it was one, and i obviously had an accountability to the secre

tell us about your work in and around _ ourjob. tell us about your work in and around the _ ourjob.t your work in and around the hospitals, the - and around the hospitals, the military and situation in gaza. we understand there is very few working hospitals now in the gaza strip. the hospitals now in the gaza strip. tie: humanitarian situation in gaza is getting more dire and more desperate with every single day. indeed, the situation in hospitals is particularly of concern. it is heartbreaking to see the images that are coming from the hospitals that are coming from the hospitals that are now turning into battlefields. we are in touch with the minister of health with the parties, reminding that insisting that civilians at doctors, that patients, winded people that receive treatment in those hospitals and also all the people who all the civilians who were displaced, they are protected by the international humanitarian law. there should be spared from any harm. ., . ., ., i. law. there should be spared from any harm. ., . ., ., ., ., harm. how much aid are you managing to net in harm

our top story is the passing — heads on and do ourjobs.sday, thanks so much for watching, bye for now. hello there, good evening. it was another cold and frosty start this morning for many, including here in chatsworth in derbyshire, a5 captured by one of our weather watchers. it will turn briefly milder for many overnight tonight. but generally, the theme as we head through this week is it will stay cold as we head into the start of december. more frosty nights, icy stretches, freezing fog patches and wintry showers, even possibly to lower levels at times. but through the day today, we've been dragging in some milder air across much of northern ireland, england and wales, along with showery outbreaks of rain that will continue to extend a further northwards and eastwards through the night, perhaps as far north as the central belt of scotland. and then that rain will pull southwards as we head through the small hours of tomorrow morning. some wintry showers still piling into much of scotland, even perhaps to lower levels at times. still an

here on the show floor, it's all about al changing ourjobs.adn't been read by a human, made me feel uncomfortable. and is itjudging us? microsoft says it's been programmed not to answer questions about how good we are at ourjobs. one of the things that we do behind the scenes is, when i ask copilot a question, we send a bunch of what we call meta prompts behind the scenes. you know, the very, very beginning of us using copilot, i could have asked questions like, "who's the least "collaborative?" mm—hm. and it would have answered the question, based on who didn't speak as much. but, ok, that's not really... that's an uninformed inference. if i said, you know, "was derek rubbish in that meeting?" it's not going to answer. right. that's right. yeah. so, exactly, because we'll provide... you know, again with those meta prompts, lots of little guards against those things. the boss of microsoft 365 is convinced jobs will evolve with the tech. with every technological inflection point, you know, there are newjobs created. i mean, 15 years ago, we cou

and ourjob is to ensure that people are safe.r two. let's talk more about the politics as well. of course the home secretary talking about bias in that time space and the uproar that caused today. the chancellor distancing himself from those comments. let's head to westminster. charlotte roses there and where are we this situation?— we this situation? seems to be in a bit of a holding _ we this situation? seems to be in a bit of a holding pattern _ we this situation? seems to be in a bit of a holding pattern at - we this situation? seems to be in a bit of a holding pattern at the - bit of a holding pattern at the moment _ bit of a holding pattern at the moment. we have heard opponents of sueiia _ moment. we have heard opponents of suella braverman command to criticise — suella braverman command to criticise her use of language in that article and comments on the police _ that article and comments on the police was — that article and comments on the police was that we have had on the other— police was that we have had on the other

rishi sunak reckons ai can help grow the economy overall, but where will it leave ourjobs?id about the consequences of ai revolutionising workplaces — bluntly, potentially, putting lots of people out of work? we should look at al much more as a co—pilot than something that necessarily is going to replace someone�*s job. you know, ai is a tool that can help almost everybody do theirjobs better, faster, quicker, but that does mean jobs can change. technology has long been revolutionary. this next wave, ai, terrifies some, excites others. chris mason, bbc news, at bletchley park. it's been more than 60 years since the beatles released their first single, but today, they've released another one. it's called "now and then" and based on demo vocals john lennon recorded in 1978 — with the song finally completed last year. let's have a listen. # now and then # i miss you # 0h, now and then # i want you to be there for me.# earlier, i spoke to katy tessler, who teaches a masters on the beatles at liverpool university, to hear what she made of the song. i think it's a really fitting

it's not ourjob to put people in danger. the location, which meant no big, wide shots for television, no specific identity about where we are. gunshots jeremy! 0k? yeah. they're still firing in this area. it's not... no. did you ever take anything out on the orders of a censor, or did you change a script? or is there anything that you would have said to the audience that you changed or didn't say because of censorship? we didn't get some of the kinds of shots we might have got. you know, you go to an area and it's completely destroyed, everything was destroyed, a classic thing you do, when you're out news—gathering is to go to a high building, get as close to the top as you could, get a great big wide shot to show scale and position. we'd agreed not to do that. but i will absolutely say we didn't take anything out at their request, because they didn't ask us to. and i didn't play them my commentary, they didn't know what it was, the script, and i wouldn't anyway have given them any kind of editorial right of veto over it. ne

and ourjob is to ensure that they are safe and that they feel safe, and that is what our plan is thereted the home secretary to accuse the police of favouritism. in the times, she wrote that "pro—palestinian mobs" were largely ignored while right—wing protesters were met with a stern response. are you resigning, home secretary? her article wasn't approved by downing street. there's been no reprimand from the prime minister, but others are deeply concerned. you have to make decisions based on the law, not based _ on popularity or polls. we are in danger of turning - the police into an arm of the state directed by politicians. suella braverman didn't make the changes to her article that rishi sunak wanted, and he has never repeated her criticism of the police. colleagues, though, were facing more and more awkward questions about her language. as many other cabinet ministers have said, the words that she used are not words that i myself would have used. but i have a productive relationship with her as a colleague. then, this afternoon, the home secretary met sir mark rowley, the head of t

and ourjob is to ensure that they are safe and that they feel safe, and that is what our plan is thererompted the home secretary to accuse the police of favouritism. in the times, she wrote that "pro—palestinian mobs" were largely ignored while right—wing protesters were met with a stern response. are you resigning, home secretary? her article wasn't approved by downing street. there's been no reprimand from the prime minister, but others are deeply concerned. you have to make decisions based on the law, not based on popularity or polls. we are in danger of turning the police into an arm of the state directed by politicians. suella braverman didn't make the changes to her article that rishi sunak wanted, and he has never repeated her criticism of the police. colleagues, though, were facing more and more awkward questions about her language. as many other cabinet ministers have said, the words that she used are not words that i myself would have used. but i have a productive relationship with her as a colleague. then, this afternoon, the home secretary met sir mark rowley, the head of t

"this is not an investment in ourfuture, our people, "ourjobs.y." and if you look at the polls, most americans say, number one, their issue is the state of the economy, inflation. they are deeply concerned. they see the country on the wrong track. and as a result, surely you wouldn't deny, joe biden is in deep political trouble. so, lowest unemployment for the longest period in 50 years. inflation came down again — just got inflation numbers out. biggest growth in manufacturing. biggest investment in infrastructure. fastest and largest job creation first three years of any presidency in modern history. the economic numbers are very strong — in fact, the strongest of any developed economy. so, how come — if i may, senator — how come if the economy is so strong — and i wouldn't dispute the numbers are looking positive? well, no, i'm not disputing — the numbers are positive. but what is not positive isjoe biden's poll rating, particularly in comparison with donald trump. right. donald trump, who is facing four trials, 91 criminal charges, all of whi

"this is not an investment in ourfuture, our people, "ourjobs.y." and if you look at the polls, most americans say, number one, their issue is the state of the economy, inflation. they are deeply concerned. they see the country on the wrong track. and as a result, surely you wouldn't deny, joe biden is in deep political trouble. so, lowest unemployment for the longest period in 50 years. inflation came down again — just got inflation numbers out. biggest growth in manufacturing. biggest investment in infrastructure. fastest and largest job creation first three years of any presidency in modern history. the economic numbers are very strong — in fact, the strongest of any developed economy. so, how come — if i may, senator — how come if the economy is so strong — and i wouldn't dispute the numbers are looking positive? well, no, i'm not disputing — the numbers are positive. but what is not positive isjoe biden's poll rating, particularly in comparison with donald trump. right. donald trump, who is facing four trials, 91 criminal charges, all of whi

rishi sunak reckons ai can help grow the economy overall, but where will it leave ourjobs?ut the consequences of ai revolutionising workplaces — bluntly, potentially, putting lots of people out of work? we should look at al much more as a co—pilot than something that necessarily is going to replace someone's job. you know, ai is a tool that can help almost everybody do theirjobs better, faster, quicker, but that does mean jobs can change. technology has long been revolutionary. this next wave, ai, terrifies some, excites others. chris mason, bbc news, at bletchley park. let's hear more about the conversation tonight between rishi sunak and elon musk. the footage was provided by downing street. this is a flavour of what they said. there will come a point where nojob is needed. you can have a job if you want to have a job for sort of personal satisfaction but the ai will be able to do everything. so... i don't know if that makes people comfortable or uncomfortable. laughter elon musk tonight's. journalists were there but not allowed to ask questions. our technology editor zoe

fact that we're having a company have such a public disagreement about something that could impact ourjobsments should be part of moving forward. that's a really interesting point. i mean, what do you think that this one particular dispute tells us about the industry more broadly in terms of the challenges it is facing amid regulation, amid more competitors? i mean, many advocates for years have talked about regulation and have advocated for more government, more input from the public, and i think this goes to show why it's necessary. a private company that is able to create — and i will admit chatgpt, dalle, a lot of programs that people find fascinating and that have helped companies should not be in the hands ofjust one entity and i think if we're going to progress, if we're going to move forward with incorporating more ai into our lives, it needs to be done in a transparent manner and this situation with 0penai really showcases that it needs to happen in a public way. i want to touch on the comments, then, we've seen from elon musk, controversial comments seen as anti—semitic — somethi

and ourjob is to ensure that they are safe and that they feel safe, and that is what our plan is thereekly demonstrations have prompted the home secretary to accuse the police of favouritism. in the times, she wrote that "pro—palestinian mobs" were largely ignored while right—wing protesters were met with a stern response. are you resigning, home secretary? her article wasn't approved by downing street. there's been no reprimand from the prime minister, but others are deeply concerned. you have to make decisions based on the law, not based _ on popularity or polls. we are in danger of turning - the police into an arm of the state directed by politicians. suella braverman didn't make the changes to her article that rishi sunak wanted, and he hasn't repeated her criticism of the police. but plenty of tory mps are backing her. number 10 has full confidence in suella. she has not breached cabinet responsibilities. she's not criticised government policy. she's set out an opinion publicly that many of the public share. downing street says the government's focused on making sure this weekend'

rishi sunak reckons a.i. can help grow the economy overall, but where will it leave ourjobs? co pilot than something that necessarily is going to replace someone's job. a. i. is a tool that can help almost everybody do their jobs better, faster, quicker. but that does mean jobs can change. technology has long been revolutionary. this next wave ai terrifies some, excites others. chris mason, bbc news at bletchley park. let's hear more about the conversation between rishi sunak and elon musk. the footage was provided by downing street. this is a flavour of what they said. there will come a point where nojob is needed. you can have a job if you want to have a job for personal satisfaction. but the ai will do everything. i don't know if that will make people feel comfortable or uncomfortable. the indian capital, delhi, is in the grip of thick smog.... these pictures were filmed a short while ago in the centre of the city. the world health organisation says that particles — which are so small they can enter the bloodstream — are currently at almost 35 times the maximum recommended

rishi sunak reckons ai can help grow the economy overall, but where will it leave ourjobs?ntly, potentially, putting lots of people out of work? we should look at al much more as a co—pilot than something that necessarily is going to replace someone's job. you know, ai is a tool that can help almost everybody do theirjobs better, faster, quicker, but that does mean jobs can change. technology has long been revolutionary. this next wave, ai, terrifies some, excites others. chris mason, bbc news, at bletchley park. let's hear more about the conversation tonight between rishi sunak and elon musk. the footage was provided by downing street. this is a flavour of what they said. there will come a point where nojob is needed. there will come a point where no job is needed.— there will come a point where no job is needed. no “0b is needed. you can have a no job is needed. you can have a 'ob if no job is needed. you can have a job if you _ no job is needed. you can have a job if you wanted _ no job is needed. you can have a job if you wanted to - no job is needed. you can have a job

rishi sunak reckons ai can help grow the economy overall, but where will it leave ourjobs?quences of ai revolutionising workplaces — bluntly, potentially, putting lots of people out of work? we should look at al much more as a co—pilot than something that necessarily is going to replace someone's job. you know, ai is a tool that can help almost everybody do theirjobs better, faster, quicker, but that does mean jobs can change. technology has long been revolutionary. this next wave, ai, terrifies some, excites others. chris mason, bbc news, at bletchley park. rishi sunak in that speech mentioned 1% rishi sunak in that speech mentioned i% by known name, known as the godfather of iri. take a listen to some of his warnings about al. this summit is very _ some of his warnings about al. this summit is very important. we're at the cusp— summit is very important. we're at the cusp of— summit is very important. we're at the cusp of bringing very powerful machines— the cusp of bringing very powerful machines in the world and we need to make _ machines in the world and we need to make

rishi sunak reckons ai can help grow the economy overall, but where will it leave ourjobs?utting lots of people out of work? we should look at al much more as a co—pilot than something that necessarily is going to replace someone's job. you know, ai is a tool that can help almost everybody do theirjobs better, faster, quicker, but that does mean jobs can change. technology has long been revolutionary. this next wave, ai, terrifies some, excites others. chris mason, bbc news, at bletchley park. so the focus at that summit has been on the dangers of ai, as it becomes more powerful and intelligent. but i've been to meet two entrepreneurs who say it could soon help humans solve very difficult challenges in our lives — from transport to medicine. i'm about to take a drive into the future. welcome to wayve, sophie. let's go! this is a self—driving car, and the 31—year—old entrepreneur behind it thinks it could soon transform our lives. so... go on. ai is now controlling the car. it's controlling the speed, the steering, the brake, the indicators, everything about the drive. this

we were a tiny little band of people, carrying on, trying to do ourjobs as everybody wondered what onarth was going on. and it's been a very strange experience watching this, hasn't it? because i was going to ask you, i mean, ask about your various jobs over the years. so you kind of did the first draft of all of this as political editor. then you made all these documentaries and you did podcasts and they're all on iplayer, and that's kind of like the second draft. what's it been like watching the latest draft unfold? i think this week has been a really important one, and i'm sure particularly for the families of those who lost people in the pandemic, it must have been very painful. and one comment sticks in my mind this week from one of them who said it was even worse in government than we had feared from the outside. i think for me, none of the testimony has been surprising. however, the act of hearing all of this pretty disturbing stuff actually being read into the public record is something that has real gravity and real meaning. and it's made me think also about the different pha

what we care about most in the immediate future is ourjobs, which industry do you think benefit and whichhich lose out? to a certain — and which lose out? to a certain extent _ and which lose out? to a certain extent perhaps i and which lose out? to a l certain extent perhaps one should look at al is taking away some of the more menial tasks, and allowing us actually to improve our skill set because some of those menial tasks, are being completed. i am thinking of basic computational aspects, collection of data, which for the people to do it, yes, it is a job but perhaps actually processing the information, which is collected, interpreting the initial results which are compiled by ai would be a much better skilled and better paid job. so to a certain extent i think some of the administrative functions are obviously under threat, on the other hand in to do with science and research will inevitably be enhanced because this speed is processes. so as with covid—19 and finding solutions for a vaccine, a lot of that process can be speeded up relative to where we were before.- can be speeded up

now we will jump because it is ourjob to make sure that the children are seen today to get fresh waterlaimed that i know everyone is working round—the—clock. i know everyone is working round—the—clock. understand that 36 hours ago just before the cease—fire, colleagues here had to get under the desk because they were shelling nearby while they were trying to plan some of these things of this is the context colleagues are working it. they will continue to do so but it is a very dangerous place to work in a difficult place to work.— a difficult place to work. thank you for takinr a difficult place to work. thank you for taking time _ a difficult place to work. thank you for taking time to _ a difficult place to work. thank you for taking time to give _ a difficult place to work. thank you for taking time to give us - a difficult place to work. thank you for taking time to give us that - for taking time to give us that backdrop here on bbc news and good luck in the next three or four days in terms of extending the help to all of this people there. let's return to the hostages because we w

yeah, i i mean, both sir patrick and i, when it initially happened, remembering that ourjob is to getery soon we realised it was a noose around our necks and did not have a government either because it blurred the distinction between the very firm, clear demarcation that must and did occur, did exist, between technical advice and political decision, for which people are then answerable at the ballot box and in parliament. in a did you have a judge that scientific advice, either from a sabbaticalfrom judge that scientific advice, either from a sabbatical from sage, judge that scientific advice, either from a sabbaticalfrom sage, was being ignored that, for example, you are excluded from meetings where you would have expected to be 0n the second, that is a different judgment, different politicians might have come to a different balance. where there are meetings where i thought that it was convenient that one or two people where they are of patrick and i was not there, yes, but that is political process, ultimately ministers were in position they could have insisted we were there, and th

we haven't got time to go into all the different things it will do but in the broad sense, ourjob inizens are exposed to them to make sure they are safe. we will now be able to do that and we are developing the expertise to do that is a range of different methodologies that are used to deliver that but fundamentally, people should be reassured, not only do we have the tools and capabilities being developed here at a rate faster than any other country, we now have the agreement to do the testing before the models are released to the public and that is something i think this summit will look back on and say is a terrific achievement, a landmark achievement. next to the telegraph. t landmark achievement. next to the teleu-rah. .,, ., ., landmark achievement. next to the teleu-rah. ., ., ., ., telegraph. i was going to ask about elon musk as _ telegraph. i was going to ask about elon musk as well. _ telegraph. i was going to ask about elon musk as well. first _ telegraph. i was going to ask about elon musk as well. first of - telegraph. i was going to ask about elon musk as well. first o

, ourjob is to ensure within the rules, within the rules of due impartiality, there is plenty of choice, i, hatred. nadine dorries, you wear the cabinet minister _ hatred. nadine dorries, you wear the cabinet minister who _ hatred. nadine dorries, you wear the cabinet minister who was _ hatred. nadine dorries, you wear the cabinet minister who was at - hatred. nadine dorries, you wear the cabinet minister who was at the - cabinet minister who was at the beginning of the online safety bill we were talking about with michael grade, are you happy with where it's ended up? his. grade, are you happy with where it's ended u - ? i, �* grade, are you happy with where it's ended u? i, �* i, i, i, ended up? no, i'm not, and the video ou ended up? no, i'm not, and the video you showed — ended up? no, i'm not, and the video you showed at — ended up? no, i'm not, and the video you showed at the _ ended up? no, i'm not, and the video you showed at the beginning - ended up? no, i'm not, and the video you showed at the beginning of - ended up? no, i'm not, and the video you showed at the beginning of y

i think that is probably a normal part of politics and ourjob was to make sure that we weren't in the. an example of somebody putting pressure on us to do it, we wouldn't do it. there is a whatsapp exchange where matt hancock asked me to change something and i said no, we are not going to change our advice because that is where the evidence bit comes in. you have to at least eight, even if you don't want to do it. but i'm absolutely sure because politicians are politicians that there were attempts to manage as and make sure that we were not always given the access that we might need overall, i think we managed to get through all that and make sure that the advice and evidence was heard, so i don't know what damage it did. i'm not sure exactly what i would recommend for the future on that because it seems to me that is partly the nature of the way the political system seems to operate. one thing we do know your evidences that around _ one thing we do know your evidences that around this time, the period 'ust that around this time, the period just after— that around this time, the perio

and ourjob is to ensure that they are safe and that they feel safe, and that is what our plan is therery? her article wasn't approved by downing street. there's been no reprimand from the prime minister, but others are deeply concerned. you have to make decisions based on the law, not based _ on popularity or polls. we are in danger of turning - the police into an arm of the state directed by politicians. suella braverman didn't make the changes to her article that rishi sunak wanted, and he hasn't repeated her criticism of the police. but plenty of tory mps are backing her. number 10 has full confidence in suella. she has not breached cabinet responsibilities. she's not criticised government policy. she's set out an opinion publicly that many of the public share. downing street says the government's focused on making sure this weekend's events go ahead without disruption. some think the outspoken remarks by suella braverman have made that more difficult. she's openly defied rishi sunak, and he is under pressure to act. but for now it seems that dealing with the home secretary is on ho

yes, both as a patrick and i, when it _ as a patrick and i, when it initially happened, when ourjob wasvery firm, clear demarcation, between a technical advice and political decision, for which people are then answerable in the ballot box. that which people are then answerable in the ballot box.— the ballot box. that was so chris whi , the ballot box. that was so chris whitty. speaking _ the ballot box. that was so chris whitty, speaking to _ the ballot box. that was so chris whitty, speaking to the - the ballot box. that was so chris whitty, speaking to the covid-19 whitty, speaking to the covid—i9 inquiry. the morning session and the afternoon session. a quick break for those giving evidence, also those listening to it, including baroness hallett, and the lead counsel for the inquiry. the other person listening throughout the course of the day is our correspondents, any price. what have you been hearing in the last hour or so? —— ellie price. yes, i've been listening inside, not in the cold. the tone has been at different today. we've been hearing over the last few weeks quite a few c

that is not ourjob.in storing and reviewing information about ex—prisoners or the physical mappa documentation is stored under lock and key in a cabinet, but when i first accessed that folder, i was absolutely appalled. >> clearly hadn't been reviewed for over ten years. there was over 20 mappa documents in that folder where court order restrictions had expired years pnor restrictions had expired years prior to me accessing that folder after an incident where a convicted paedophile was allegedly given a smartphone against his restrictions , mark against his restrictions, mark notified the office that they had a big problem. >> did we have sexual offenders, stranger rapists , applying for stranger rapists, applying for work, applying for training opportunities that still had mappa restrictions in place , mappa restrictions in place, court order restrictions. >> we just didn't know. it was impossible to ascertain , a impossible to ascertain, a senior manager wrote back to say, you have identified a massive

that is not ourjob.t that point i realised we have a huge problem . realised we have a huge problem. >> mark also claimed that there were problems in storing and reviewing information about ex—prisoners or the physical mappa documentation is stored under lock and key in a cabinet. >> when i first accessed that folder , i was absolutely folder, i was absolutely appalled. clearly hadn't been reviewed for over ten years. there was over 20 page documents in that folder where court order restrictions had expired years pnor restrictions had expired years prior to me accessing that folder. after an incident where a convicted paedophile was allegedly given a smartphone against his restrictions, mark notified the office that they had a big problem . did we have had a big problem. did we have sexual offenders, stranger rapists? it's applying for work, applying for training opportunities that still had map restrictions in place, court order restrictions. we just didn't know. it was impossible to ascertain a senior

that is not ourjob.ealised we have a huge problem. >> mark also claimed that there were problems in storing and reviewing information about ex—prisoners . ex—prisoners. >> all the physical mappa documentation is stored under lock and key in a cabinet. but when i first accessed that folder , i was absolutely folder, i was absolutely appalled. clearly hadn't been reviewed for over ten years. there was over 20 mappa documents in that folder where court order restriction had expired years prior to me accessing that folder after an incident where a convicted paedophile was allegedly given a smartphone against his restrictions. >> mark notified the office that they had a big problem. >> did we have sexual offenders, stranger rapists, applying for work, applying for training opportunities that still had mappa restrictions in place, court order restrictions . we court order restrictions. we just didn't know. it was impossible to ascertain a senior manager wrote back to say you have identify died a massive risk f

. >> let's look at one of the biggest holes in in our jobs biggest holes in in ourjobs market at thencies in social care, old people needing to be looked after. in a moment. you're going to be in that camp needing. no, i'm not after you. >> no, i'm not. >>— >> no, i'm not. >> that is the reality of going. >> that is the reality of going. >> i am 85. >>- >> i am 85. >> i'm in the fortunate position of going to the gp rest home where there is no shortage of people who are going to look after. >> he's going to marry a woman, not i am not against i'm not against any nationality looking after me or looking after my family. right. >> but what i don't want to do is don't to bring in tens is i don't want to bring in tens of of other people. of thousands of other people. >> why competitive markets. >> why competitive markets. >> but tessa, we've got millions of people in this country who aren't actually in employment who could be in employment. and part actually part of the reason is actually we're paying people enough we're not paying people enough in that's why we're in social care. that's

but this mean, and our job and the this i mean, and ourjob and the i mean, this is a very damning articleis arguably damning. arguably very damning. and that's it's about that's really what it's about for because . because now for the met because. because now there is because it tinted there is because it was tinted windows sports car. there windows in a sports car. there is evidence that met saw is no evidence that the met saw them as a black hole. but when you read the story, it's quite horrific. they arrested, they had their baby the they had their baby in the car. they hadnt had their baby in the car. they hadn't been proven. hadn't done they've been proven. they anything wrong they hadn't done anything wrong at this argument and the at all. this argument and the met, first came out and met, when it first came out and the were like the video, the met were like they and was they were speeding and there was all stuff. turns out all this stuff. and it turns out that's just not true. i agree with you. >> think well, >> but i think that well, it looks like what the times is making story is

but this mean, and our job and the this i mean, and ourjob and the i mean, this is a very damning articlebly damning. arguably very damning. and that's it's about that's really what it's about for because . because now for the met because. because now there is because it tinted there is because it was tinted windows sports car. there windows in a sports car. there is evidence that met saw is no evidence that the met saw them as a black hole. but when you read the story, it's quite horrific. they arrested, they had their baby the they had their baby in the car. they hadnt had their baby in the car. they hadn't been proven. hadn't done they've been proven. they anything wrong they hadn't done anything wrong at this argument and the at all. this argument and the met, first came out and met, when it first came out and the were like the video, the met were like they and was they were speeding and there was all stuff. turns out all this stuff. and it turns out that's just not true. i agree with you. >> think well, >> but i think that well, it looks like what the times is making story is about m

that is not ourjob.lem . have a huge problem. >> mark also claims that there were problems in storing and reviewing information about ex—prisoners or the physical mappa documentation is stored under lock and key in a cabinet. >> but when i first accessed that folder, i was absolutely appalled. clearly hadn't been reviewed for over ten years. there was over 20 mappa documents in that folder where court order restriction had expired years prior to me accessing that folder after an incident where a convicted paedophile was allegedly given a smartphone against his restrictions. >> mark notified the office that they had a big problem. >> did we have sexual offenders, stranger rapists, applying for work, applying for training opportunities that still had mappa restrictions in place, court order restrictions . we court order restrictions. we just didn't know. it was impossible to ascertain when a senior manager wrote back to say you have identify died a massive risk for both this case and wider . wider. >> but

and it's a marvellous language and it's i mean, our job as writers is in mean, ourjob as writers is inhat is a result of empire in a sense, but that's, as it were, the honey from the beehive, not the mess and anger of the beehive . of the beehive. >> you say that the empire has gone.indeed >> you say that the empire has gone. indeed it has. i wonder whether the commonwealth is going i mean, the royal family must feel a little bit reluctant to go around the commonwealth now because there having a bit of a hard time. some some well, some places they may be jeered, some places they may be jeered, some places they have to stick to these forms . malayic. to these forms. malayic. non—apologies oh, it's quite tncky non—apologies oh, it's quite tricky for them, isn't it ? tricky for them, isn't it? >> well, of course, but they have to suck it up in a way. i mean, this is what look at the commonwealth. what was interesting last the other week was the cenotaph when it's not just the prime ministers and the royals that go the commonwealth send their people and they stand there. you've got to unde

it is ourjob as conservatives and i say this as a conservative mp to a conservative backbench mp to holde that actually fire to ensure that actually they efficiencies they are pursuing efficiencies when it comes to public spending, that actually they're not increasing public spending when need to. and at when they don't need to. and at the time making sure we've the same time making sure we've got productivity in got much more productivity in our economy and our labour market and ultimately trying to reduce the burden of taxation on businesses and on individuals. >> okay. well, look, it's interesting stuff about the autumn statement there. we have also seen, you know, there was this dramatic reshuffle that was got last and got this time last week and a day or two, wasn't it? some rather familiar faces re rejoined the front benches. i'm showing a video here, cameron. we've got james cleverly. we've got . what do you got rishi sunak. what do you what you see when you look at what do you see when you look at that? what do you feel? >> well, i was obviously in david cameron's government back

and ourjob is to add more light and better to this world, to try to make it a better world.d. >> that is a very lovely philosophy . and after we saw philosophy. and after we saw those shocking scenes, it's been very interesting to hear your generally reassuring message about the state of community relations in the region . rabbi relations in the region. rabbi shneur segal, thank you very much for joining shneur segal, thank you very much forjoining us on gb news. after the break, i'll be delving into some mediaeval true crime as researched at the university of cambridge. upload a map of 14th century murders patrick christie's on gb news. i'm gb news radio. >> welcome back. if a homicide detective had existed in the 13005, detective had existed in the 1300s, the case files might read something like this . spice something like this. spice merchant stabs fruiterer over old enmity man murdered him . old enmity man murdered him. feud between saddlers and goldsmiths guilds and vicious attack for dropping eel skins outside a shop . these are three outside a shop. these are three of

>> is something that if we do ourjobs >> is something that if we do our jobs right, you will wake upwant you to get to know and we want you to get to know us it's breakfast us from 6:00. it's breakfast with eamonn and isabel monday to thursdays news, britain's thursdays on gb news, britain's news channel . news channel. >> hello, good afternoon and welcome to gb news on tv, online and on digital radio. i'm nana akua and for the next three hours, me and my panel will be taking on some of the big topics hitting the headlines right now. >> about opinion. >> it's mine , it's theirs, and >> it's mine, it's theirs, and of course it's yours . we'll be of course it's yours. we'll be debating, discussing and at times we will disagree. but no one will be cancelled . so one will be cancelled. so joining me in the next hour , joining me in the next hour, broadcaster and journalist danny kelly and also broadcaster and author christine hamilton. in a few moments , we'll be going head few moments, we'll be going head to head in a clash of minds with gb news senior commentator nigel nelson former ne

them die because inconvenience because it's less inconvenience than our job properly. than us doing ourjobid? i think is abhorrent? who wanted to do for who said you wanted to do for old people instead of instead of instead channel migrants instead of channel migrants but you to for the you coming out to bat for the pensioners now, are you? i don't think should killed by a think they should be killed by a useless government. and this is what and were what rishi and boris were thinking. no is what dominic. >> belinda now belinda. okay. >> belinda now belinda. okay. >> the average of death >> the average age of death from covid 83 and it was covid was 83 and it was a horrific death. i'm sure, for many. and my heart goes out to everyone. but to shut down a country in the humane way the scientists did, especially over things funerals and it was things like funerals and it was something really inhumane about the scientists. and i'm actually glad that was a little bit glad that there was a little bit of pragmatism . of pragmatism. >> we haven't got to where we've got. i'm sorry, but can i just g

them die because inconvenience because it's less inconvenience than our job properly. than us doing ourjobthink is abhorrent? who wanted to do for who said you wanted to do for old people instead of instead of instead channel migrants instead of channel migrants but you to for the you coming out to bat for the pensioners now, are you? i don't think should killed by a think they should be killed by a useless government. and this is what and were what rishi and boris were thinking. no is what dominic. >> belinda now belinda. okay. >> belinda now belinda. okay. >> the average of death >> the average age of death from covid 83 and it was covid was 83 and it was a horrific death. i'm sure, for many. and my heart goes out to everyone. but to shut down a country in the humane way the scientists did, especially over things funerals and it was things like funerals and it was something really inhumane about the scientists. and i'm actually glad that was a little bit glad that there was a little bit of pragmatism . of pragmatism. >> we haven't got to where we've got. i'm sorry, but can i just got. i'